Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of fashion on society
Effect of fashion on society
Negative effects of fashion on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of fashion on society
5.1. Summary
Overall, the results show that sex sells, as indicated by the prevalent use of women and men as sexual imagery. However, the analysis of ‘gender exploitation’ further reveals that it is a bigger issue of gender exploitation in this context further reveals that it is a extremely important issue today. This has led to statements by Cortese, Williamson, Wolf and many more mentioned throughout the research paper. The impression is given that fashion advertising such as the US clothing lines should be stopped from getting away, should not adopt this way of ‘artistic’ methods into their own work. The focus of beauty, and commercial advertising literature concerned with contemporary sources were key in tracing back, looking for the answer.
…show more content…
A stark comparison to that of American fashion companies like that of American Apparel who would seem bypass the same established laws in society with clever marketing loopholes. It has been detected, that even though American Apparel has a diluted image in European markets due to advertising regulation. They’re image and style is still being broadcast like a parasite across social media, which has no such regulations and social boundaries. Resulting in European markets being tainted by their ever growing brand. The analysis results from the research have enlightened the author the need to inform our generation to the fact our social idealizations are being raped by corporate greed. We must define what is acceptable in Design.
American Apparel has the opportunity to change their brand image to a less- sexual store image. Their ‘USA’ label will allow American Apparel to gain a strong market position against other basic brands. Overall, American Apparel has many strengths and opportunities that allow the company to market in a new way. There is hope that this research could one day help raise consumer awareness on this specific issue, and also benefit the use of design in more appropriate
Jane Collins’ book Threads: Gender, Labor, and Power in the Global Apparel Industry (2003) shows how the apparel industry developed to become labour intensive, driven by low wages and is particularly oppressive against females. The book outlines how two clothing companies, Tultex and Liz Claiborne subcontract work out to plants in Mexico. Collins suggests labour conditions in developing nations help shape new unions with both communal and women’s interests as a driving force. However in order to critically examine the strengths, weaknesses, and methodology of the book, it is necessary to have a full understanding of the author as it gives insight into any possible bias which may appear.
Even though advertisements can advertise new products, sex-appeal strategies attract customers in ways where the media exploits women and gives women unrealistic looks of what beauty is. The renowned fashion designer Tom Ford is a great example to consider when taking a look at gender representation. His 2012 fall collection appeals to the need for sex, the need for attention, and the need to satisfy curiosity.
We see the ways that the popular media uses gender tensions everywhere. The truth is that sex sells, we know that. The challenge that advertisers face is: How to use it best. Some advertisers do this better than others and the ones that truly have an understanding of gender tensions will, in the end, sell the most. In my last paper, I explored how the company Abercrombie and Fitch uses gender tensions to sell their clothes. They have become among the masters in advertising and the business in booming. They cater to young adults and young adults only for one powerful reason: It is at this age in which the sexual tensions between male and female are greatest. Abercrombie and Fitch has found their niche.
In Jean Kilbourne's documentary “Killing Us Softly 4”, she gives multiple detailed examples of advertisers making women a sexual object which leads to society dehumanizing the female species. As well as this, they are finding younger and thinner women to use, even photo-shopping their models to unrealistic body shapes; warping the average women's view of what she should look like. American Apparel's founder and CEO Dov Charney himself stated that he had worked hard to acquire the provocative image they have today and that he purposefully created ads that were “soaked in youth and sex” (Chauduri). The company insists that they are simply “open about sexuality” and should not be persecuted for it (Chauduri). While sex is more prominent and less taboo than it has been in society, there is a definite line between more “open” about sexuality, and abusing the sexual side of men and women. By “open about sexuality” Dov Charney and American Apparel actually mean that they are going use extremely young women in promiscuous positions to sell their clothing, despite the fact that the...
In “The man behind Abercrombie and Fitch.” An interview conducted by Benoit Denizet-Lewis displays a glimpse into the life of Mike Jeffries and his views of his company only hiring “good-looking” people and targeting “good-looking” people to wear his clothes. This has been done in order to force his audience to recognize that the issue of acceptance one’s peers and exclusion of a community mentioned by Mike Jeffries, is a result of cultural perceptions and individual self-image. Denizet-Lewis skillfully shows that while Jeffries remarks of not wanting the “not-so-popular” kids to shop in his stores, it poses a question to consumers asking what change in our attitudes will come or if there will be any change at all. Thus comes the issue of how consumers today have a shift in the reasoning behind why one buys clothing and the motivating factors that influence one to buy certain clothing. Denizet-Lewis also demonstrates the different messages that controversial advertisements and statements affect different groups of people and how what they project is really what people desire, though deemed by many people as unacceptable or inappropriate. The author also examines how in the news media, the image has become more important than the message and how images have taken precedent over actual issues and character. As a result of this, various communities have formed by the construct of selling to “beautiful people” and how popular appeal has become an extension of a person.
But jean sells are increasing when their commercial shows a woman being attacked by three men (464) (Kilbourne)? Kilbourne states that commercials that have a sexy man doing something dangerous becomes erotic, therefore men have this perception that being the good boy is not a positive attribute. When examining Kilbourne’s advertisement selection we see men in control, pushing women against walls and having two women flock over one man. Kilbourne’s selection was to confirm the discrimination women face. The group of feminist fund-raisers, who call themselves SlutWalkers are currently trying to “reclaim the word slut,” by marching around in skimpy clothing making jokes about the industries of prostitution and pornography. They are putting women into a difficult situation because they are pushing for empowerment, but does empower cross your mind when there are half-naked women waltzing around? These women believe they are taking a stand against men, but truthful they are giving them exactly what they want…women strutting around with very little clothing on (Powers). Women are portrayed similarly in advertisement for cars, alcohol, and aftershave; because sex sells. Women are sexy and attractive which sells products on television; however when it comes to advertisement on the radio a man’s voice is used 78% because it is convincing and strong
Open up any magazine and you will see the objectification of women. The female body is exploited by advertising, to make money for companies that sell not just a product, but a lifestyle to consumers. Advertisements with scantily clothed women, in sexualized positions, all objectify women in a sexual manner. Headless women, for example, make it easy to see them as only a body by erasing the individuality communicated through faces, eyes, and eye contact. Interchangeability is an advertising theme that reinforces the idea that women, like objects, are replaceable. But sexual objectification is only the tip of the iceberg. In society's narrative, subject and object status is heavily gendered, with men granted subject status most of the time, and women severely objectified. The difference between subject status and object status is simple; a subject is active, and an object is passive. These messages...
To sum up, it is often said that advertising is shaping women gender identity, and some have been argued that the statement is true, because of the higher amount of sexual references of women that advertisement show and the damages that occur on women’s personality and the public negative opinions of those women. As well, the negative effects that those kinds of advertisements cause to young generations and make them feel like they should simulate such things and are proud of what they are doing because famous actors are posting their pictures that way. Others deem this case as a personal freedom and absolutely unrelated to shaping women gender identity. On the contrast, they believe that, those sorts of advertisements are seriously teaching women how to stay healthy and be attractive, so they might have self-satisfaction after all.
Advertising in American culture has taken on the very interesting character of representing our culture as a whole. Take this Calvin Klein ad for example. It shows the sexualization of not only the Calvin Klein clothing, but the female gender overall. It displays the socially constructed body, or the ideal body for women and girls in America. Using celebrities in the upper class to sell clothing, this advertisement makes owning a product an indication of your class in the American class system. In addition to this, feminism, and how that impacts potential consumer’s perception of the product, is also implicated. Advertisements are powerful things that can convey specific messages without using words or printed text, and can be conveyed in the split-second that it takes to see the image. In this way, the public underestimates how much they are influenced by what they see on television, in magazines, or online.
Advertisements have been featuring sexual images to increase sales since the nineteenth century, and the phrase ‘sex sells’ is so popular even children know it. From cigarettes to soap to underwear to jeans, sex is used to sell everything, and the image of a naked women is one of the most popular examples of this. In the Weyenberg advertisement, the woman is topless and completely uncovered by anything but her own arm, despite the fact that she is selling a shoe. There is no correlation between the object being sold and nudity, they are actually direct opposites, but the company will still use it because they are more likely to sell shoes to men if the advertisement makes them think of sex. This image of women has not changed in the four decades since this advertisement was created, and it is so normalized that most people never stop to think about what is so inherently wrong with that. In 2013, just three years ago, Robin Thicke released a song encouraging rape that was able to sell astronomically well, and then he posted a music video featuring topless women being used as sexual objects that encouraged sales even more, and all because it features women and sex. Both the advertisement from 1974 and the music video from 2013 present women as sexual objects as a way to increase sales of the product, and since they
The 1950s advertisement for men's shoes depicts women on the same level of a mans shoe, which at the time was looked at as where she belongs, the advertisement uses a females submissiveness, loyalty, and inferiority to her husband to promote the masculinity of the product. The different versions of girlhood are created through advertisements. In the 1950’s, the advertisements used for promotion had one thing in common, they used a woman to sell their product. Not only did they use their bodies, but they used their inferiority.
The portrayals of men in advertising began shifting towards a focus on sexual appeal in the 1980s, which is around the same that women in advertising were making this shift as well. According to Amy-Chinn, advertisements from 1985 conveyed the message that “men no longer just looked, they were also to be looked at” as seen in advertisements with men who were stripped down to their briefs (2). Additionally, advertisements like these were influencing society to view the male body “as an objectified commodity” (Mager and Helgeson 240). This shows how advertisements made an impact on societal views towards gender roles by portraying men as sex objects, similarly to women. By showcasing men and women in little clothing and provocative poses, advertisements influenced society to perceive men and women with more sexual
For the past several decades, globalization has been a hot topic and it also anticipates every aspect of the world to connect each other. Likewise, globalization also allows consumers to have more access to catch up with updated fashion. The advantages of globalization bring a new philosophy called fast fashion, which holds quick response time and enhanced design in fashion apparel industry. In this paper, I will deliver By exploring all the aspects of each system, I will conclude the reason why fast fashion becomes the mainstream of the fashion apparel industry, and use one particular brand, Zara, as an example to discover the impact on consumer behavior in detail. Finally I will make some comments on the future of fast fashion and what luxury brands will react to this circumstance……..
In the capitalistic society, sexual objectification of women has become one of the most popular and effective ways of promoting a product. Female bodies are used in a lot of commercials. Not only do females reveal their body parts for the sake of ‘sex appeal’, they are often identified as a product itself, sometimes even regardless of the context.
She contends that by using female sex to sell their products, advertising companies send the message that ‘all women, regardless of age, are really temptresses in disguise, nymphets, sexually unstable and seductive’” [DelVecchio]. By turning these comic book women in to sexual objects, comic book writers can