Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of fashion
The influence of fashion
The influence of fashion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Look Good but Feeling Bad? In “The man behind Abercrombie and Fitch.” An interview conducted by Benoit Denizet-Lewis displays a glimpse into the life of Mike Jeffries and his views of his company only hiring “good-looking” people and targeting “good-looking” people to wear his clothes. This has been done in order to force his audience to recognize that the issue of acceptance one’s peers and exclusion of a community mentioned by Mike Jeffries, is a result of cultural perceptions and individual self-image. Denizet-Lewis skillfully shows that while Jeffries remarks of not wanting the “not-so-popular” kids to shop in his stores, it poses a question to consumers asking what change in our attitudes will come or if there will be any change at all. Thus comes the issue of how consumers today have a shift in the reasoning behind why one buys clothing and the motivating factors that influence one to buy certain clothing. Denizet-Lewis also demonstrates the different messages that controversial advertisements and statements affect different groups of people and how what they project is really what people desire, though deemed by many people as unacceptable or inappropriate. The author also examines how in the news media, the image has become more important than the message and how images have taken precedent over actual issues and character. As a result of this, various communities have formed by the construct of selling to “beautiful people” and how popular appeal has become an extension of a person. As the CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch, Mike Jeffries has turned the company into a multi-billion dollar brand by selling youth, sex and causal superiority, which gives way to the concept and emergence of an “imagined community.” The definit... ... middle of paper ... ...sther Dyson. First Monday, 1(1). doi:10.5210/fm.v1i1.466 Cebrzynski, G. (2000, March 13). Sex or sexy? The difference is that one sells, and the other doesn’t. [Electronic version]. Nation’s Restaurant News, 34, 11, 14. Imagined communities. (1992). Journal of International Affairs, 45(2), 639. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/220689061?accountid=13631 Lee, D. (1969). Society and the adolescent self-image. Sociology, 3(2), 280-280. doi:10.1177/003803856900300250 Pentecost, K. (2011). Imagined communities in cyberspace. Social Alternatives, 30(2) Imagined communities. (1992). Journal of International Affairs, 45(2), 639. Retrieved from Sarwer, D. B., Grossbart, T. A., & Didie, E. R. (2003). Beauty and society. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 22(2), 79-92. doi:10.1053/sder.2003.50014
In the essay “What Meets the Eye”, Daniel Akst explains scientific facts about the beauty of men and women matters to people. He argues that attractive individuals receive attention, great social status, marries, and gets paid more on a job. One can disagree with Akst’s argument because anyone with the skills and knowledge, despite the appearance, can gain a decent relationship and can get paid well. Akst looks at beauty as if it can lead individuals to an amazing and successful life, but he is wrong. Nancy Mairs’ and Alice Walker’s views on beauty are explained internally and through self-confidence. Both women’s and Akst’s arguments on beauty share some similarities and differences in many ways, and an
The concept of beauty is a subject society speaks on through many channels. Social media plays a tremendous role in how society measures beauty and how to achieve these impossible standards. People from all walks of life have become obsessed with the idea of beauty and achieving the highest level it. In many cases, those who do not meet societal views of what is “beautiful” can become very resentful to these predisposed notions of beauty. David Akst in his writing “What Meets the Eye”, is bitter toward women and their ongoing obsession with beauty.
In the 1997 article Listening to Khakis, published in the New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell effectively paints a vivid picture of the thought and science that goes into advertising campaigns. Gladwell begins his paper by focusing on the Dockers’ advertising campaign for their line of adult male khaki pants, which he labels as extremely successful. This campaign was the first line of successful fashion advertisements aimed directly toward adult males (Gladwell, 1997). This campaign was cunningly simple and showed only males wearing the pants being advertised with the background noise filled with men having a casual conversation (Gladwell, 1997). This tactic was used because studies showed that Dockers’ target market felt an absence in adult male friendships. (Gladwell, 1997). The simplicity of the advertisements was accentuated as to not to deter possible customers by creating a fashion based ad because, based on Gladwell’s multiple interviews of advertising experts, males shy away from being viewed as fashion forward or “trying to hard” (Gladwell, 1997).
Thomas Frank’s book entitled The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism takes a poignant look at the advertising world of the 1950’s and 1960’s, exploring how advertising played a role in shaping the next generation of consumers. Frank points out that he believes many misunderstand how important the key industries of fashion and advertising were to the shaping of our consumer culture, especially in getting Americans to rethink who they were. The industry of advertising was not conforming to the upcoming generation, instead the new consumer generation was conforming to the ideals of the advertising industry. Frank believes that the advertising and fashion industries were changing, but not to conform to the new generation, instead to shape a new generation of consumers.
It is evident that today’s advertisements for teen clothing are neither healthy, nor ethical, to use as a way to attract teen consumers; however, companies are getting away with this behavior, because their effective and inappropriate advertisements are merely innuendos. The modern label placed on teens is said to be the primary contender for the cause of eating disorders, suicide, bullying, and depression. Fortunately, groups of teens are getting together to put an end to these unethical advertisements and the messages the ads give off to teens; because of their efforts, the amount of effect that advertisements have on teens now, may dramatically plummet sometime in the near future. In my opinion, it is crucial that us teens make a profound alteration to the way teen merchandise is advertised, which in turn will end the knavish behavior of ...
You go pick one either because the picture is better or you saw the commercial the other day and you want it. During the length of this paper we will talk about two important writers, Kalle Lasn the writer of “The Cult You’re in” and Benoit Denizet-Lewis the writer of “ The Man Behind Abercrombie & Fitch”. They both talk about similar topics that go hand and hand with each other, they talk about the consumers “Dream”, how companies recruit the consumers, who cult members really are, how people are forced to wear something they don’t want, and about slackers. What is the dream we all have? Think about the main things that you strive for in life.
.... "The Beauty Industry Promotes Unrealistic Beauty Standards." Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers, 2007. Rpt. in The Culture of Beauty. Ed. Roman Espejo. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
Wolf, Naomi. "The Beauty Myth." Signs Of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers. 4th edition. Ed. Sonia Maasik, and Jack Solomon. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin's, 2003.515-524.
know beauty in any form”(86). We are so conditioned to see female beauty as what men
Readers are taken from New Haven and Times Square to Oxford and Paris and then back to Queensboro Bridge, a mythic world of adventure and noble luxury created by Gatsby. Whether intentional or not, this syncs beautifully with Brooks Brother’s advertisement, where viewers are transported through time to the fashion of the roaring 1920s. The aesthetic pursuit of clothing that is at one American and European, and yet relevant to the contemporary period almost a century later, is magically mythic. Consumers with a penchant for the historic and the modern, North American and European could all potentially be attracted by Brooks Brothers’ offerings.
It’s no secret that some women believe fashion portrays who they are. Therefore follow every season’s new trend. This leads to spending money that they don’t have. Waller Lea, a journalist, suggest that “for some communities, purchasing knockoffs or generic products are frowned upon, forcing minorities to spend more money. Now businesses and companies are targeting minorities, causing more debt problems.” Addicted to retail or brainwashed? Opponents claim that fashion is simply a creative way to express themselves. There are others ways to express ourselves that are no based on our appearance. Through drawing, painting or through our thoughts and ideas. What happens when someone can’t afford expensive clothing or doesn’t have access to fashionable clothes? They are singled out and excluded from society for being different.
When you think about clothing advertisements these days, do you think the cloth advertised suits you or makes you feel like you need that cloth to fit in? This advertisement from the retailer giant Abercrombie & Fitch effectively uses the rhetorical appeals to attract consumers mostly focusing on pathos. A&F employs their models attractiveness and sex appeal to create a window effect that allures the shoppers all around the world. Moreover, for a company that has been around for more than a century, the name A&F in a simple t-shirt is enough to persuade a shopper to buy it. Finally, its aggressive use of logos has established an exclusive brand that is not fit for just everyone and the feel that you must wear it to either blend in or stand
As a result, marketers and advertisers rigorously target the teen consumer in any way they can. Teens have a staggering amount of buying power, in part because they have the ability to work and have influence over their parent’s money. Advertisers go as far as create movements in youth fashion, music, and food among other products. They call it “taking the brand to the street” and it includes using high-profile celebrities to endorse their products on T.V. or in their personal lives. Overall, the goal of marketing teen consumerism that most businesses follow can be seen as marketing the “cool” to teen’s, advertising body images, and packaging girlhood and boyhood. Teens are continually bombarded with limiting media stereotypes of what it is to be a girl or a boy in today’s world. They “packaged childhood” and sell it to them through ads and products; across all media, from T.V., music, movies, magazines, to video games and the internet. Be it body shape, skin condition, fashion, music, being cool, or just, having the right type of gadget, teenagers are very uncertain about who they are or where they fit in. Advertising works best when it creates an insecurity about something and such insecurities are easily found amongst teens. This is also where the social fact concept of the functionalist perspective can be seen in this theme. As American consumerism continues to market teen obsession, this creates an
A person’s sense of style begins during adolescence where young adults begin to differentiate themselves based on appearance. Terms such as the jocks, burnouts, preppies, and gothic are examples of young people being categorized based on appearance. As these young person’s transition into adulthood the branding changes to collegiate, homeless, business man/woman, blue collar, sophisticated, etc. The phrase “looks can be deceiving” illustrates how luxury and fashion can influence perception.
Children use clothing as a form of identity, and when their families cannot afford the latest trends, it can lend itself to feelings of low self-worth and can even make children targets of bullying. Children are inundated every single day with advertising and marketing, and these kids are connected to media a good portion of their day. This allows advertisers to creep into our children’s lives and target them multiple times every day. Corporations are guilty of putting financial gain ahead of children’s health and well-being, and the fashion industry has been identified as one of these industries (L...