Gender Case Study: Biological Determinism?

855 Words2 Pages

Case Study: Gender

Gender by many scholars is deemed to be socially constructed although there is much debate to whether this is actually the case. Simone De Beauvoir (1973: 301) famously claimed that ‘One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman’. In this undisputed text de Beauvoir argues that women are not born a woman. Instead they have to develop feminine behaviours and traits in order to become a woman implying they were not always a woman. It is not the case that nature causes women to be feminine and men to act in a masculine way. Society has constructed it to be this way. Kate Millet also takes a gender socialisation view. Arguing that one’s gender has nothing to do with their biological makeup instead it depends on their culture …show more content…

Biological determinism is the view that human traits and behaviours are determined genetically. Thus they believe that humans are born with certain traits, they do not acquire them over time. For example, if a girl is passive and does not speak in class then they were born with those traits. In the context of gender and sex determinists believe traits displayed by men and women are explained in terms of biology. Certain biological determinists do not recognise gender. They would adopt the argument from Parsimony as they believe that gender is not needed to explain the traits of men and …show more content…

I will show first why gender does exist. Then I will go on to explain the reasons why I believe that it is socially constructed using an example called the social learning theory to support my argument. Before the 1960s gender was not a recognised term apart from denoting masculine and feminine words (he or she). In the 1960s a phycologist named Richard Stoller (1968) deemed there was a demand for trying to define transsexual people, as their gender and sex did not seem to match. Transsexuals were biologically the same but chose to be a different gender. Thus the distinction between sex and gender was made. Moreover, it has then been developed to explain the common hierarchal dominance of males over females. This social constructivist stance taken by Stoller is very similar to de Beauvoir. It separates the biological (sex) from the social (gender). Both arguments put forward by both Stoller and de Beauvoir show that biological determinism between the sexes does not explain the experiences of transsexuals. Secondly it shows that the behavioural traits that are shown by men and women are seriously affected by social factors. Thus to support this, one might put together a Quinean Argument from Ontological Commitment to show that gender does

Open Document