Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender representation in the media
Gender representation in the media
Gender representation in the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender representation in the media
Elizabeth Montgomery was an American actress who lived from 1933 to 1995. Of her five decades of work in the entertainment industry, her most renowned role was as Samantha in the comedic-fantasy TV series Bewitched which aired from 1964 to 1972. During the period when Americans were experiencing trying events such as the assassination of President John Kennedy and the civil rights movements, Samantha’s magical powers and almost perfect life served as a means for the stressed public to periodically dismiss reality. In real life, Elizabeth Montgomery was an empowered activist. However, this paper will explore the influence of social and cultural aspects in regards to gender and women’s leadership roles as observed through the character Samantha, which Elizabeth Montgomery developed and brought to life.
In the series Bewitched, Samantha is
…show more content…
a witch in love with a mortal man. Due to the dilemma of her inter-being relationship, Samantha had decided to live the life of a typical middle class homemaker by suppressing the use of her magical powers and pretending to be the ideal wife her husband desired. The situation is noteworthy, particularly because Samantha self-monitored and restricted herself, although she did not have to. With her magical powers, Samantha could have done anything she desired. The following paragraphs analyze potential factors that may have driven Samantha’s agreement to her situation as well as uncover the tools and strategies Samantha used such as her wit, innovativeness, experience and commendable behavior characteristics in conjunction with a dash of her magical powers to navigate effectively to lead her household. A situation analysis of Samantha’s life exposes the many constrains she lived with. Chiefly, her husband denies her the freedom to use her magic regularly. Given that in every episode Samantha faced various adverse situations, she had to routinely address the dilemmas by initially resorting to the only power her husband will allow her to use, her powers of persuasion. However, to neutralize the situations and expedite the outcomes, Samantha reluctantly does make use of her magic. After all, Bewitched is only an hour-long show and Samantha’s problem were far from small and usual. Unfortunately, Samantha’s restrictive situation extended beyond her husband and home. For instance, throughout the series, Samantha repeatedly states that she cannot “come-out” to the public with her secret because the public are not yet ready for magic. Although it is a popular theory that Samantha’s secrecy reflects the situation of the LGBT community, an argument that cultural norms regarding “women” behavior, which requires hiding all which is not “modest and self-effacing”, is equally as valid (Williams, 2014). Considering the limited range of acceptable behavior for women, not only could Samantha not fly around on a broomstick, but also she could not even raise her voice to display dismay. In conformation to these social norms, Samantha restricted herself throughout the series. Hence, it can be said that Samantha’s decisions are simply a reflection of the female expectations at the time, which was to put one’s husband before oneself. In addition, Darrin worked all the time, devoting every bit of effort to his job for a chance at promotion, higher pay, and job satisfaction. It is suggested that he never mastered the art of work life balance, nor did he want to. To add to the unbalance, Darrin actually tended to bring his work home in the form of client meetings. Hence, Darrin, Samantha and their daughter never had essential family time. In addition, Samantha had to single-handedly manage the household. Although Darrin did love her, he left her to her own means at all times. For Samantha, Darrin’s absence did allow her to grow as an independent woman. Ultimately, this dynamic pushed Samantha to develop and exhibit numerous leadership qualities and management strategies in her role as a homemaker leading to her to thrive in her life. The first notable leadership quality in Samantha is her wit. Samantha is full of wit. However, her wit is not reckless. Samantha’s wit is based on her belief that honesty is the best policy. In the pilot episode, although she knew that Darrin might leave her, she decided to disclose her secret to him. To note, even at this point, Samantha was fully in charge of the situation. She was prepared to contain the situation should it have gone array. However, throughout the series, Samantha does reveal her powers to a select few. An underlying lesson from such instances is that the approach taken in the presentation of information is most important as it determines the deciphering and understanding of information. For instance, in Samantha’s case, her revelations are frequently discounted as jokes due to the candid and humorous way Samantha delivers the news. Remarkably, through the series, Samantha continuously displayed control over gender biases and in this; she exposed her second notable quality- innovativeness. Although she was aware of social sanctions, she found means to be in control without emasculating the male. For Samantha, most routine human activities were foreign. Meaning, she still had to learn to do everything expected of a woman her age due to social norms. However, Samantha’s innovativeness did not necessarily lie in her ability to perform human tasks; it resonated in the fulfillment of characteristics required for innovation. Samantha was not afraid to think and live “out-of-the-box”. For instance, although her mother was against the marriage she chose, Samantha whole-heartedly followed her belief that wealth was not in riches and power but in family and love. In addition, she always remained open to new ideas and learning to facilitate her existence. In such ways, she maintained herself as an evolving leader. The third quality Samantha exhibited was her reliance on experience when leading. In most cases, she used her faith in people to solve problems. However, she also realized that she might have to occasionally remind others of her worth, although it may require her to leave for some time. Through example, she showed the audience that by leaving, one can stop people from taking one for granted as the absence promotes cognitive reevaluation of one’s contribution, worth and significance in a particular dynamic. Likewise, Samantha also displayed that a leader should always stay close to their support system. For instance, Samantha could always whisper for her mom, dad, cousin or some magical being in case of a crisis. Additionally, for Samantha, individual victories were minor to family wins. Hence, she was always a team player. She knew the things that made her happy and worked with others to acquire satisfaction. Fourthly, Samantha had internalized some behavioral characteristics, which allowed her find balance between her gender and leadership expectations.
For instance, regardless of her level of anger, Samantha was always respectful. She was also good-natured and well intentioned for in her world, those with corrupt intentions usually suffered immediately. She also boasted the “Big Five” characteristics- Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism as identified by Eagly and Carli (2007). She asked the right questions at the right time and always remained calm during testing situations. Additionally, in line with the suggestions of Grant and Taylor, Samantha becomes a quick thinker as her interaction with the human world increases (2014). In addition, Samantha consistently projected warmth from the pilot episode to the finale, which according to Grant and Taylor may have contributed to her effectiveness in leadership (2014). In addition, Samantha routinely utilized her sense of humor together with her female charm to cover-up any unfavorable situations. Noteworthy is the fact that Samantha also smiled a
lot. However, ultimately, she also had one trick up her sleeve- her magic. Although one does not always need magic powers, having them is definitely an advantage. Samantha’s magical powers not only sped up events, but it also filled in for her gaps in understanding of human beings. For a non-magical being, her magic translates into acquiring various skills along the way. By acquiring various skills, one can make life much easier. In addition, these skills will allow one the power to self- survive and be independent. These are distinct necessities, especially for women, as they allow for stronger negotiations. In conclusion, in eight years, Samantha, a magical middle class homemaker ended up with five Emmy nominations. In those eight years, Samantha matured from a daughter to a wife to a mother. In her various roles, she encountered many stereotypes and mirrored traditional household structure of the time. Nonetheless, regardless of the social setting in which Samantha existed, she demonstrated herself to be a strong female protagonist. In her role, she displayed admirable leadership qualities. Samantha pushed for many cultural changes, within her own world and ours. She was successful because she was an expert tightrope walker between gender and leader expectations. However, according to Groysberg and Abrahams little has changed in the business world since Samantha (2014). This little change signals to the women of the future that greater strategic efforts have to be made so that the efforts of women such as Samantha do not go to waste.
The media is a powerful tool and has the ability to influence and change one’s overall perspective of the world and the position they play in it. Although Television shows such as Friday Night Lights are seen as entertainment by consumers, its storyline contributes to the social construction of reality about class in the United States.
During the 1950‘s suburbs such as Levitown were springing up all across the country, and the so-called American dream was easier to achieve for everyday Americans than ever before. They had just come out of two decades dominated by The Great Depression and World War Two, and finally prosperity was in sight. The need for women to work out of the home that was present during the war was no more, and women were overwhelmingly relegated to female-dominated professions like nursing, secretaries, and teachers, if they worked at all. Televisions became very popular, and quickly became part of the American cultural canon of entertainment. Leave It To Beaver is a classic American television show, encompassing values such as respect, responsibility and learning from your mistakes. But, at least in the episode used for this essay, it is also shockingly sexist to a modern viewer. This begs the question, what does the episode The Blind Date Committee1 say about the gender expectations of the 1950’s?
Today’s women are an accumulation of the characteristics of their predecessors. In the film Dance, Girl, Dance, the two supporting characters, Bubbles and Judy, exemplify some of the most relevant characteristics of contemporary women. The character of Bubbles not only demonstrates manipulative and superficial behavior, she also demonstrates ambition and resourcefulness. The character of Judy exhibits independence and tenacity, but also naivety and innocence. Today’s women have molded themselves with the most relevant characteristics of each of these women, drawing form both positive and negative attributes.
The role of women in American history has evolved a great deal over the past few centuries. In less than a hundred years, the role of women has moved from housewife to highly paid corporate executive to political leader. As events in history have shaped the present world, one can find hidden in such moments, pivotal points that catapult destiny into an unforeseen direction. This paper will examine one such pivotal moment, fashioned from the fictitious character known as ‘Rosie the Riveter’ who represented the powerful working class women during World War II and how her personification has helped shape the future lives of women.
In American culture today, women continue the struggle of identifying what their roles in society are supposed to be. Our culture has been sending mixed messages to the modern day female, creating a sense of uneasiness to an already confusing and stressful world. Although women today are encouraged more than ever to be independent, educated, and successful, they are often times shamed for having done just that. Career driven females are frequently at risk of being labeled as bossy, unfeminine, or selfish for competing in many career paths that were once dominated by men. A popular medium in our culture such as television continues to have significant influences as to how people should aspire to live their lives. Viewers develop connections with relatable characters and to relationship dynamics displayed within their favorite shows. Fictional characters and relationships can ultimately influence a viewer’s fashion sense, social and political opinion, and attitude towards gender norms. Since the days of Bewitched and I Dream of Jeanie, where women were commonly portrayed as being the endearing mischievous housewife, television shows have evolved in order to reflect real life women who were becoming increasingly more independent, educated, and career oriented throughout the subsequent decades. New genres of television are introduced, such as the workplace comedy, where women are not only career oriented, but eventually transition into positions of power.
Baker, Ella. A. Developing Leadership among Other People in Civil Rights. The American Women's Movement, 1945-2000. A Brief History with Documents. Comp.
The role of American women has changed significantly from the time the nation was born, to the modern era of the 1950s and 1960s. Many people, "... believed that women's talent and energies ... would be put to the better [use] in the new republic." (Clinton 3) Clearly showing that society has seen the importance of the women's talents and that their skills can be very useful, exploited this and thus, the change of the women's role was inevitable. Society has understood that the roles of women played an important role on all parts of life.
It is often said that the media and the arts are an accurate reflection of any given community. This is especially true in American pop-culture, where television shows depict the various stereotypes attributed to men and women and the roles they play in society. House, a highly popular medical drama that revolves around Dr. Gregory House and his diagnostic team, is a particularly good example as it represents the true state of the traditional gender roles in American culture today by, both, redefining and reinforcing them over the course of the show.
Allyson Jule’s article on feminism in conjunction with Mary Tyler Moore establishes that the show can be used to teach the American movement of second wave feminism (123). She looks at the show as more of a historical teaching tool rather than just a comedy. On the other hand, Willa Paskin explores another view of the show, the comedy.
Marable, Ingrid A. The Women of August Wilson and a Performance Study and Analysis. Thesis. University of Central Florida, 2009. Web.28 Apr. 2014.
Another important discrepancy between reality and Hollywood’s portrayal of it can be found in union leadership. While Silkwood depicts multiple women in positions of power within the company union, in all actuality Karen Silkwood was the only woman who held such a position. Since women in positions of leadership were rarer in the 1970’s, this is an interesting omission. Silkwood’s era marked the rise of second-wave feminism; a primary issue addressed by second-wave feminists was sexism in the workplace as well as the importance of increasing the number of female leadership in the
There are two women from the near and distant past that have become strong female role models in recent years: Queen Elizabeth I and Virginia Woolf. These women were not without problems while growing up, though. Elizabeth’s mother was beheaded after being charged with treason when she was only three; she grew up viewing women as indispensable after her father had six wives; her family kept dying (mother, step mother, father, half brother, sister), and she was locked away by her sister Queen Mary in the Tower of London for a number of years. Virginia Woolf on the other hand battled with depression and mental disease her whole life, was denied a typical education because she was female, had many mental breakdowns after death of mother, and was institutionalized after father’s death. Both Elizabeth Tudor and Virginia Stephen-Woolf shared many of the same family problems in their lives, but their life paths and careers were drastically different from one another.
Stefanie Simon, and Crystal L. Hoyt purpose is to show that women exposed to media images of women in counterstereotypical roles reported less negative self-perception and greater leadership aspirations than women exposed to images of stereotypical roles. Simon and Hoyt first argument is that despite the fact that women make up nearly half of the U.S. workforce that statistically they are 78% less women than men at the top CEO positions in the fortune 500. Simon and Hoyt last argument is that negative stereotypes about women in leadership positions are closely tied to gender role stereotypes about men and women. This article is significant to my essay because it goes into detail about how the portrayal of stereotypes in media have a negative
“Girls wear jeans and cut their hair short and wear shirts and boots because it is okay to be a boy; for a girl it is like promotion. But for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, according to you, because secretly you believe that being a girl is degrading” (McEwan 55-56). Throughout the history of literature women have been viewed as inferior to men, but as time has progressed the idealistic views of how women perceive themselves has changed. In earlier literature women took the role of being the “housewife” or the household caretaker for the family while the men provided for the family. Women were hardly mentioned in the workforce and always held a spot under their husband’s wing. Women were viewed as a calm and caring character in many stories, poems, and novels in the early time period of literature. During the early time period of literature, women who opposed the common role were often times put to shame or viewed as rebels. As literature progresses through the decades and centuries, very little, but noticeable change begins to appear in perspective to the common role of women. Women were more often seen as a main character in a story setting as the literary period advanced. Around the nineteenth century women were beginning to break away from the social norms of society. Society had created a subservient role for women, which did not allow women to stand up for what they believe in. As the role of women in literature evolves, so does their views on the workforce environment and their own independence. Throughout the history of the world, British, and American literature, women have evolved to become more independent, self-reliant, and have learned to emphasize their self-worth.
These homemaking shows’ tactics were to encourage and show women that being a homemaker, wife, and mother is not a lonely life or a life full of drudgery and that having this status is not being an unproductive citizen. These shows had to incorporate these tactics because a decade before women’s role were vastly different to the roles they have now. Women before were working in jobs that were mainly solely for men, they were independent by earning their own wages, and being patriotic citizens by participating in the war effort by fighting on the home front or joining the military. Their work on both fronts were dangerous and life-threatening in which these jobs were predominantly for men; many were spies, others made bombs and weapons, and many flew planes and carried out dangerous missions. All of this changed during the postwar years in which their main occupations now were mothers and housewives. It may seem that women decreasing independence and their rigid gender and social mobility made them feel limited in