Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How sexism changed over the year
How sexism has changed over time
How sexism has changed over time
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How sexism changed over the year
History vs. Hollywood: Silkwood
The film Silkwood is a historical drama that recounts the heroic yet tragic tale of Karen Silkwood, who fought against the suffocating and debilitating chains of bureaucracy. She risked her life to prove that the company that her employers were failing to work in the interests of its employees or its customers. The movie depicts Karen’s toil in the Kerr-McGee Cimarron Fuel Fabrication Site, where she works under unsanitary and often unsafe conditions. Silkwood portrays the decrepit house that she inhabits alongside her boyfriend and her friend. Over the course of the movie, Karen becomes a union activist who ultimately discovers that the company is cutting corners whenever possible: Photographs of faulty fuel
…show more content…
One such difference can be found in the fact that, throughout the film, people smoke virtually everywhere: Karen smokes while holding her young child,; she smokes as she’s being diagnosed with radiation poisoning; factory workers smoke while readying themselves for a day on the job. The prevalence of cigarettes in Silkwood speaks to the acute lack of knowledge regarding cancer in the 70s. Casual sexism--another unfortunate aspect of 70s culture--makes frequent appearances throughout the film. For instance, during a meeting with the union, Karen is ignored by many union leaders when she tries to express the concerns of the workers. (Ironically, worker’s rights are, of course, the entire point of any union meeting.) Although casual sexism is still rampant in modern society, women larger garner more respect from their male counterparts than they did in the 70s. . In fact, gender equality is a recurring theme throughout the …show more content…
One such discrepancy can be found in the name of her friend: In the movie she was called Dolly Pelliker, yet her real name was Dusty. One can only assume the Silkwood screenwriter believed ‘Dolly’ to be more romantic than the less-alluring ‘Dusty.’ One true part of her friend’s portrayal is Dusty’s sexuality. In the movie Dolly’s sexuality is a point of controversy in the film, as it certainly must have been Dusty’s real life, since she was openly gay in a small town in Texas. While much progress was being made for gay rights during the 70s, LGBT relationships were still stigmatized and vilified by many people. Another important discrepancy between reality and Hollywood’s portrayal of it can be found in union leadership. While Silkwood depicts multiple women in positions of power within the company union, in all actuality Karen Silkwood was the only woman who held such a position. Since women in positions of leadership were rarer in the 1970’s, this is an interesting omission. Silkwood’s era marked the rise of second-wave feminism; a primary issue addressed by second-wave feminists was sexism in the workplace as well as the importance of increasing the number of female leadership in the
This clearly meant that the 1920’s were the time period when the series of events were taking place. Jacquelyn Hall opens by discussing the women led protest within Elizabethton which fought against low wages, amongst other unequal treatment of women in the very industry that women were currently dominating in. Hall also speaks on the domino effect that this protest had on the entire country. Elizabethton ultimately sparked a subtle revolution of other protests involving labor all throughout other areas. At this time in history, women were ultimately the central component of the entirety of the textile industry. The fact that twenty percent of women aged fourteen and above were currently taking part in paid professions, shows that the role many women played in households was slowly beginning to change. Hall describes the situation as one where the women were obviously refusing to work, while simultaneously willing and ready to negotiate. Just as in about any other worker led protest where equal rights are
Discriminating gender roles throughout the movie leaves one to believe if they are supposed to act a certain way. This film gives women and men roles that don’t exist anymore, during the 60s women were known to care for the family and take care of the house, basically working at home. However, a male was supposed to fight for his family, doing all the hard work so his wife didn’t have too. In today’s world, everyone does what makes them happy. You can’t tell a woman to stay at home, that makes them feel useless. Furthermore, males still play the roles of hard workers, they are powerful compared to a woman. However, in today’s world a male knows it isn’t right to boss a woman around, where in the 60s, it happened, today women have rights to do what they want not what they are
After the success of antislavery movement in the early nineteenth century, activist women in the United States took another step toward claiming themselves a voice in politics. They were known as the suffragists. It took those women a lot of efforts and some decades to seek for the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. In her essay “The Next Generation of Suffragists: Harriot Stanton Blatch and Grassroots Politics,” Ellen Carol Dubois notes some hardships American suffragists faced in order to achieve the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. Along with that essay, the film Iron-Jawed Angels somehow helps to paint a vivid image of the obstacles in the fight for women’s suffrage. In the essay “Gender at Work: The Sexual Division of Labor during World War II,” Ruth Milkman highlights the segregation between men and women at works during wartime some decades after the success of women suffrage movement. Similarly, women in the Glamour Girls of 1943 were segregated by men that they could only do the jobs temporarily and would not able to go back to work once the war over. In other words, many American women did help to claim themselves a voice by voting and giving hands in World War II but they were not fully great enough to change the public eyes about women.
The role of women in American history has evolved a great deal over the past few centuries. In less than a hundred years, the role of women has moved from housewife to highly paid corporate executive to political leader. As events in history have shaped the present world, one can find hidden in such moments, pivotal points that catapult destiny into an unforeseen direction. This paper will examine one such pivotal moment, fashioned from the fictitious character known as ‘Rosie the Riveter’ who represented the powerful working class women during World War II and how her personification has helped shape the future lives of women.
In the stories “A Worn Path” by Eudora Welty and “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker, you see two different ways that women are seen and the different times that they are living in. For example in one story we have a college student who comes back home for the first time and has a different outlook on life now. In the other story we have an older lady who is willing to endure whatever to make sure that her loved one is taken care of. Even though these two stories are very different in the way the roles of women are seen, they show how women roles in society are seen from the past and present and how something have changed but are still the same.
Aulette, Judy and Mills, Trudy. "Something Old, Something New: Auxiliary Work in the 1983-1986 Copper Strike." Feminist Studies 14.2 (1988): 251-268.
After all, a late grant has modified that detailing by uncovering a great record of female activism. The assignment is to depict and celebrate as well as to contextualize and along these lines to get it. Also, the structure of the work power and the business, the worldwide strengths that encroached on nearby occasions these particularities of time and place adapted ladies ' decisions and molded their personalities. Similarly, vital was a private world customarily pushed to the edges of work history. Female relationships and genders, between generations and class collisions, held the fuse of new shopper wishes into an element territorial culture stimulated ladies ' support. Ladies thusly were authentic subjects, making the circumstances from which the strik...
A woman in the workplace was common but they did not receive the pay they deserved. Often, a woman’s job was the same as the previous male, but they did these jobs for 53% of the male’s pay. (Tolman) Eventually many woman and men went on strike demanding equal pay.
For several decades, most American women occupied a supportive, home oriented role within society, outside of the workplace. However, as the mid-twentieth century approached a gender role paradigm occurred. The sequence of the departure of men for war, the need to fill employment for a growing economy, a handful of critical legal cases, the Black Civil Rights movement seen and heard around the nation, all greatly influenced and demanded social change for human and women’s rights. This momentous period began a social movement known as feminism and introduced a coin phrase known in and outside of the workplace as the “wage-gap.”
In the 1960’s women were still seen as trophies and were beginning to be accepted into the work industry. They were still homemakers, raised the family, and made sure their husbands were happy. That was the social norms for women during that time period. They were not held to high work expectations like men were. But something amazing happened that would change women 's lives for centuries; it was the 1970’s. The 60’s put the equality movement in motion but 70’s was a time of reform where women were finally able to control their own paths. Not only was the 70’s a historical marker for the fiftieth anniversary for women suffrage, it was also a marker for the drastic change of different social norms, the changes of the American Dream, and the
Led by Clara Lemlich, 20,000 immigrants, mostly young women, demanded a twenty percent pay raise, a fifty-two hour workweek, and a closed shop (59). Their cause gained a significant amount of attention and caught the eye of wealthy progressive reformers, such as Alva Belmont and Anne Morgan, who perceived the strike as an opportunity to also advocate their own objective: women’s suffrage. Wealthy elites like Carnegie and Sumner may have believed that efforts to change the natural order are futile, but Morgan claimed that after learning about the details of the strike, she and other women wouldn’t be able to live their lives “without doing something to help them” (72). These affluent women demonstrated their support from both sides of the spectrum, from modestly distributing ribbons and buttons, to Alva Belmont’s contribution of her several cars to a parade for the striking workers (682) and the pledge of her mansion as surety for the bail of four strikers (76). Without the aid of these women, it was doubtful the strikers “could have lasted much longer without progressive money” (70). However, frustration arose amongst picketers as these progressive reformers turned a strike based on class struggle into a “broader feminist revolt” (68). Morgan blamed the strikers’ treatment on the inability for women to vote, not their inability to unionize (67). Striker’s retorted, asking
Women have been treated unfairly and discriminated in the workforce for too long. The discrimination that these women face is unjust and unwarranted. It is sad that as a society in the twenty-first century we are still trying to combat these issues. In Developing Women Leaders was published in The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist July 1, 2012 it discusses possible solutions and how stigmas and stereotypes are starting to change. Women should not have to face discrimination in the workplace as a society there should be an equal standard for all individuals no matter the race or gender.
Men have dominated the workforce for most of civilization up until their patriotic duties called away to war. All of a sudden, the women were responsible for providing for their family while the men were away. Women went to work all over America to earn an income to insure their family’s survival. Women took all sorts of jobs including assembly line positions, office jobs, and even playing professional baseball. When the men returned home from war, the women were expected to resume their place as housewives. The women who had gotten a taste of the professional life decided that they wanted to continue working. Thus, the introduction to women in a man’s working environment began. Women were not taken seriously at first, because they were stepping into a “man’s world”.
The roles of women changed drastically between 1950’s and 1970’s due to the political, economic, and social issues, but women’s lives also stayed close to the way they had always been. The lives of women changed in a plethora of ways throughout the years. “We believe that women can achieve such equality only by accepting to full the challenges and responsibilities they share with all other people in our society, as part of the decision-making mainstream of American political, economic, and social life” (Statement of Purpose, 1966).
the Labor Site. Women in the Workplace - a history. n.d. 15 November 2013 .