Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sudhir venkatesh gang leader for a day conclusion
Sociological phenomological of gangs in america
Global social problems of gang activity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sudhir venkatesh gang leader for a day conclusion
For this online assignment, I have decided to talk about Sudhir Venkatesh’s Gang Leader for a Day, chapter 4. This chapter spoke out the most to me in this book. So far in the last three chapters, we have learned that how Sudhir is a graduate student doing a research on the daily lives of poor black lives in Chicago. In this chapter we see Sudhir interacting with the group leader of the gang Black Kings in Robert Taylor. At first JT the group leader or the boss comes off very strong on Sudhir, laughing on his face about the questioner he has prepared to ask the gang members or the people living in that building, he is suggested by JT that he should get to know people first. Not only that Sudhir is not accepted in the area first because of his …show more content…
appearance, but also most of the group members think that he’s there spying on them for the Mexican gang from the other side of Chicago. In this chapter, Sudhir is seen interacting with JT face to face.
JT invites Sudhir to be part of the group and see their day-to-day lives he is asked to spend day and night with them, getting to know the rules they go by and how they solve problems. Sudhir is told by JT that no police has ever come to this side of town to take care of their problems, so therefore they have to take care of their problems themselves, making the rules and punishments. Sudhir on other hand is very respectful of JT’s rules and doesn’t get involved in their matters. One of the other things that are very surprising in this chapter is that JT asks Sudhir to be the leader for a day, where he faces problems such as encounters dealing with drug dealers, thieves, and making unforeseeable decisions. He is even presented a situation where Billy and Otis because Billy never paid Otis but Otis never gave all the money he owed Billy. Otis pocketed the rest of the money that he claimed Billy owed him. Sudhir thought it over and came to the conclusion that Billy never did pay Otis, but at the same time, Otis never denied stealing the owed money. This leads Sudhir to conclude that Otis stole the money and should be the one to be …show more content…
punished. Sudhir at that moment realized that JT’s job wasn’t that easy as it looked. If I was to put this chapter in the large context of the book, the things that’ll come out would be that the government isn’t able to provide for these 40,000 people and therefore they have to go for help to these gangs.
Whereas for these gangs they think that it’s their responsibility to provide for these people but in return they expect these people to join their gang. Therefore people and mostly teenagers join the gang. One of the other things that I’ll be putting in context is that since these gangs have leaders to answer to they must be doing something right to be running their society. It’s a big thing for people from the society going to gang leaders for help rather than the government. It also shows that these gangs are doing everything they can to provide for their people even if that gives them a bad name or puts their life in danger. They seem to the ones caring more about their people rather than the
government. One of the major theses in this chapter was Sudhir Venkatesh’s being given the chance to be the gang leader for a day, this is important as a thesis because Venkatesh who was a non-violent, a university student with no history of leading a gang or being as abusive or hard as them was given an opportunity to see how it was running a gang, how cold hearted he needed to be towards some of his or JT’s loyal people and how smartly was he going to handle every situation. One of the examples of this is how Sudhir managed the conflict between Otis and Billy, the other example would be how he followed JT to the 20 groups of 5-6 members who sold drugs and lead with questions such as did you lose any regulars or any new hustlers hanging around. This relates to something we learned in our sociology class and that is crime and deviance, yes Sudhir wasn’t a criminal but that one-day of him being the gang leader made him a Criminal deviance in so many ways. Deviance is any behavior that violates the standards of conduct or expectations (social norms) of a group or a society. Sudhir acted as a primary deviance whereas JT is secondary, the difference between both of them is that Sudhir was acting like a leader for a day whereas JT is the leader always for him it’s the way he lives his life. Maybe not to the extent that secondary deviance because serial killers fall into that category as well. Sudhir is able to fit deviance in his research by being one so that he is able to understand how it feels to be the leader and how to be successful at being one. For Sudhir the research method that he was planning on using at first was just a survey like questioner that he was going to ask everyone he came across that seemed like a good candidate, but when he saw that people weren’t taking his questioner seriously and he was advised to get to know the people a much better before he slams them with his question. He decides to use both methods observational and questioner, getting real close and seeing them personally. Living with them in the same building and spending all the time with them from their gang meetings to their personal family time. One of the reasons why his research was so accurate and was so personal was because he got to know them personally; he was able to know their personal problems, to their day-to-day problems that they have to face. He was able to understand them deeply as a friend. One of the things that I found interesting was that he was making personal connections with everyone, making an effort to get to know them personally about their lives at home and within the gang. He accomplished that by observing them on their daily routine and being part of their gang to a point that he was put up as their leader for the day. This was important for him because he just couldn’t ask them to fill out the questioner because they didn’t even know him and they did not trust him that made him spend day and night with them. That turned out to be very helpful for his study because it was more of an insight towards the lives of the gang members and the problems that they face. One of the problematic things about this chapter was that he was put as the gang leader for the day and the situation that he had to solve for Billy and Otis were based on what he was told by both of them if he knew them personally maybe he would have given a different situation.
As time went by, J.T. and Venkatesh met less and less and in the year 1998, most of the Robert Taylor buildings would be demolished. As their encounters were coming to an end, J.T. offers Venkatesh names of gang members in Newark and in New York, to enable Venkatesh to pursue his research elsewhere since his dissertation had long ago been finished which was written on the ways that people living in poverty made a living to get them by day-to-day.
The book emphasizes the idea of how difficult it is to leave the gang lifestyle. There are frequent cases of relapse by individuals in the book, who were once out to again return to gangs. This case is brought by what gangs represent to this in the book and what leaving entails them to give up. The definition of gangs presented to the class was, three or more members, share name, color, or affiliation, or must exist in a geopolitical context. To members associated with gangs, this definition can include your family members, neighborhood, everyone that they associate with. Take for example Ronnie from Jumped in by Jorja Leap it states,” Ronny’s role models are gangbangers. His family is a hood. His mentors are older homies in county jail.”(102). Ronnie and other gang members like him do not
A Climate of Fear “The Gang Crackdown”, provided by PBS, communicates the everyday struggles that the communities of Nassau County face every day. The video’s focus revolves around the homicidal and violent crimes that have been provided by the “MS-13” and the details of cracking down on their development. The Latin American gang from El Salvador is known for their audacity to target the young population of Long Island and their homicidal tendencies. They have targeted children and teenagers at their workplace, their home, and their school. These gang members have left the community defenseless and struck fear into the hearts of many parents along with the government itself.
...g measures out there. The reader is given plenty of background information on gangs allowing someone with little knowledge of the subject or the cities’ history to jump right in. Statistics, interviews, surveys and personal observations of the authors during ride-alongs make up much of the source material. The book’s strengths lie in the amount of research contained within it, as well as an insider look at the gang unit and what it takes to be an officer in that specialization. However, if it is not being used to supplement another research paper or study, the book comes off as a difficult and boring read, making a reader likely to put it down otherwise.
Gang Leader for a Day written by Sudhir Venkatesh consisted of Sudhir himself studying, observing and partaking in a study for his dissertation on the South Side of Chicago with underprivileged African Americans who are gang affiliated. The methodological and ethical issues that were found in his book reflect potential strengths and weaknesses of his qualitative research. Venkatesh brought to light the dangers and awareness of being associated with the Black Kings gang, there were situations that were new to him that he had to adjust himself to and be cautious of for the future. Although there were a few ethical issues presented in his book, there was a greater lesson at large taken from his results.
The story, Gang Leader for a Day by Sudhir Venkatesh, is a ethnographic study of a Black King Gang in the Robert Taylor community. Venkatesh accidentally stumbles upon the gang lead by J.T. and decided to study them. Throughout his journey he learns from the violence and illegal activity he witnesses that “in the projects it’s more important that you take care of the problem first. Then you worry about how you took care of it”’ (Venkatesh. 2008:164). He witnesses beatings, selling of illegal drugs, and exploitation of residents; but he also gained a lot of knowledge about the community. He works with J.T. and Ms. Bailey, the community leader, closely through his study. J.T. has taken a sociology class and he allows Venkatesh to shadow the gang
According to the 2015 National Gang Report (NGR) from the National Gang Intelligence Center (NGIC) almost half of law enforcement juristictions across the United States reported a rise in street gang membership and street gang activitiy. My communitty is no exception.
They present us new answers, that were obtained by studies. For example, in chapter 3 “ Why Do Drug Dealers Still Live With Their Moms?”, you would think that selling drugs should be a great business. But Sudhir Venkatesh was a student in the University of Chicago that went to Chicago's poorest black neighborhoods for an assignment and ended up living with gang members. He was very intrigued to see how gang member’s organization worked from top to bottom. Venkatesh found out that the reason may drug dealers still live at home is because the organization of a gang is like a franchises only the top leaders are getting the big wage’s and the street dealers are only getting paid like $3.30 an
In Venkatesh’s Gang Leader for a Day, he violated many ethical codes when conducting his research in the Robert Taylor Homes. The ASA “Code of Ethics” states that there are four rules “1. To protect research subjects, 2. To maintain honesty and openness, 3. To achieve valid results, 4. To encourage appropriate application”(47 Chambliss & Schutt). Given these four guidelines we can see that Venkatesh’s work is in violation. A few examples are his lack of informed consent, an occurrence of deception that helped him receive his data, as well as the lack of confidentiality that the experiment had.
“Just another day as an outsider looking at life from the inside”, says Sudhir Venkatesh ,referring to his involvement in his research study. Venkatesh is a self proclaimed “rogue sociologist” who wanted to study the lives of poor black families living in Chicago. Instead of solely conducting interviews and surveys, Venkatesh took it a step further and immersed himself in the environment that he was studying. Gang Leader for A Day describes Venkatesh’s experiences with the Black Kings, and ultimately explores gang life through a lens that not many would be willing to adopt.
In Sudhir Venkatesh’s ethnography Gang Leader for a Day, is his research is through the University of Chicago in the 1990s and chose to do research on poor black people. He stated about his experience with JT in the Robert Taylor Housing and to understand how their life if differentiates from others. Throughout this paper I will be speaking about Venkatesh’s research, the limitation, my opinion in how Venkatesh understood all of his findings, and how his experience mesh with my own. The novel is his dissertation, his ethnography where he collected data record their observations, and find a way to understand the meaning behind it all.
in chapter 3 of “FREAKONOMICS: Why Do Drug Dealers Live with Their Moms?” our author takes a look into the reason why so many drug dealers still live at home with their moms. Until provide a more in depth look into the gang lifestyle, our author recalls the experience of Sudhir Venkatesh with the black disciples. Venkatesh was born in India born, upstate New York native who held a degree in mathematics as well as a Ph.D. in in sociology. His first assignment nearly leads to his death, as his graduate advisor sent him out into Chicago poorest black neighborhoods. During his search for participants to help him complete a survey, he stumbled upon a Black Gangster Disciple Nation members who were in the midst of a turf war. Sudhir a random man
As a kid I could remember walking to school every day. While on the way to school there was always a group of kids sanding outside of the school walking away. These kids dressed differently and they all whore the same type of clothes. It wasn’t until years later that I was told to stay away from them because they were gangsters. They were gangsters that caused problems to the community. These gangsters would go up to kids and try and jump them into their gang. For them the more members they had the more “territory they had.” One problem that major cities around the world have is gangs. Most of these gangs are made up of many juvenile delinquents looking for trouble. These gangs tend to hang out in certain places and claim it as their territory. Many of the gang members are drawn together by similar interests, and are brought up in similar neighborhoods.
Venkatesh, S. A. (2008). Gang leader for a day: a rogue sociologist takes to the streets. New York: Penguin Press.
For example, students that are part of low-income families often have to have jobs themselves along with their parents. This means they spend less time studying and being part of extracurricular activities that help further their education. Another example is related to the lack of parental contact and support. It may be necessary for the parents to hold many occupations. The result is students do not have parents around to encourage them to do their homework. The student may then care less about their homework and education in general. When combined, the end result is a student that has inadequate access to a decent education and a person who does not care about education in general. The students then tend to turn their focus from school to areas they feel like they would fit in. Association with gangs can be quite intriguing to individuals who feel that they do not belong. They can provide a sense of familial ties and protection that individuals may not find at home because their parents are constantly working. While not all gangs are violent, it can still be extremely common. Not all people who are in poverty join gangs, but as our reading in chapter six explains we can still see a large correlation between violence and poverty. High stress is often common in people who live in poverty because they may have multiple jobs, lack of good meal, or have poor living conditions. Because of either joining a gang or not, people often turn to violence. If that individual is caught, then they have to deal with the criminal justice system. Here we have now made the full circle and connected the two systems. While we have connected the two systems, the story does not stop there. An example could involve a person that committed a crime that lands them in prison for the rest of their life, but they could have also committed a minor crime. Since they have a