Gallipoli Movie Historical Accuracy

1322 Words3 Pages

Gallipoli is a historical film released in 1981 (directed by Peter Weir) which chronicles the lives of two young Australian men, and their journey through enlisting in the Australian Army and serving in the Battle of Gallipoli, of the First World War. The film itself represents the past through three main aspects. Firstly, the film both reflects and influences societal values and attitudes, and in this way mythologises aspects of history, specifically when considering the ‘ANZAC legend’. Simultaneously the film is able to shape societies knowledge of parts of history, looking at the futility of war in conjunction with a partial shift in blame for the immense number of casualties (26,000 Australians) of the campaign. Finally, in the films representation …show more content…

Although Hollywood movies are able to encourage interest into topic areas, which previously would have been less accessed by the average person for example the Gallipoli campaign, it still has its limitations. The main limitations of Weir’s Gallipoli include primarily that it was made for entertainment purposes, and thus cannot be qualified as being an accurate source, due to a strong romanticized nature. Gallipoli does remain correct throughout most of the film, in recounting order of events from the first landing at Gallipoli, the follow up landings and the Battle at the Nek, even to the food eaten on the peninsula including Bully beef and the “Anzac wafer” . However, the film loses this concrete history through bias and perspective. As explored in the above example of the English “Drinking tea” whilst an attack was underway (which was untrue) it illustrates a strong Australian perspective which decreases authenticity. Another aspect of the film is that there are rarely any scenes from the perspective of Turkish army, who they were fighting against. Not only does this very clear “Us vs. Them” distinction enhance the lack of recognition of the Turkish army’s losses (almost 70,000) , but also fails to admit that through the Turkish perspective, Gallipoli was a success. The Turkish army were forced to defend their land under attack and suffered immense loses, yet they were able to defend their nation and thus, celebrate March 18th, 1915 as the victory in the Battle of Çanakkale. This neglected understanding of the Turkish army again diminishes the historic accuracy and usefulness as a source. This neglect of multiple historical views is the second limitation of the film, which are important to identify, as they

Open Document