Assessing Balance in Elderly Women: The Functional Reach Test

924 Words2 Pages

Functional Reach Test
Gisselle Molina Diaz
Keiser University











Functional reach test on elderly women at risk of falls
The brain is a computer that programs and connects all the human systems to work together. Each of these systems has its own function, but more than one system may contribute to one specific function. For example, the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems are the three sensory systems that contribute to maintain balance under different activities of daily living and environmental conditions. Elements found in the musculoskeletal system provide good stability and equilibrium. Assessing balance is part of the scope of practice of the physical therapist and physical therapist assistants in order …show more content…

To perform this test, a yardstick is placed on the wall at the acromion process’s height. The patient must stand parallel to the wall with his/her feet open to shoulder height. The arm closest to the wall is positioned at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion with the elbow and hand extended. The tester records the starting position at the third metacarpal head on the yardstick. Next, the patient—without moving his/her feet—moves his/her trunk forward and reaches as far as he/she can. At this point, the tester locates the position of the third metacarpal and obtains the first measurement, usually in inches. After that, the patient returns to the starting position, waits three seconds, and repeats the test. The functional reach test is performed three times; however, the average measurement of the last two times is considered the final measurement (Sonu & Manoj, 2014).

The recently study to 100 females of age above 65 years old at risk of falls demonstrates the differences between the regular functional reach test (FRT) versus a target oriented-functional reach test (TOFRT). The article “Non-Target and Target-Oriented Functional Reach among elderly females at risk of falls” compares the results of the standard functional reach test to a target- oriented functional reach test by performing the regular FRT first and then by providing a target.
Selection …show more content…

Average scores for the study were 5.3720 inches of FRT and 8.5090 inches of TOFR. A relevant result was that 14 subjects ‘scores were 9.5-9.9 inches or greater on the Target-Oriented Functional Reach, indicating a minimal risk for falling according to Sonu & Manoj, (as cited in Shumway, Gruber, Baldwin & Liao, 1997)
Obviously, statistical analysis showed differences between the two methods which means that FTOFR is not exchangeable for the FRT and therapist are advised to use the original functional reach test. On the other hand both tests measure balance in patients at risk for fall but one of the limitations of this study was the level of fatigue of the subjects trying to reach further limits.
The authors stated that future studies should validated in others groups of subjects such as men. Without doubt “…altering the functional reach test by providing a target would produce mild correlated score and use functional reach test as its original format.” (Sonu & Manoj, 2014, p.167).


References
Sonu, P. & Manoj, M. (2014). Non-Target and Target-Oriented Functional Reach among elderly females at risk of falls. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. Vol,8,

Open Document