Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the holocaust
Social impact of the holocaust
The impact of the holocaust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of the holocaust
Stern, was invited to the house of a Nazi memorabilia collector, Fritz Stiefel. He was led to believe that secret diaries were kept by Nazi Leader Adolf Hitler, after he had spotted a big black book in one of his display cases and was told the book was one of the six supposedly kept secret diaries. Heidemann saw an opportunity to have one of the biggest journalistic scoops of the 20th century if he were able to track down all the diaries and prove the books to be authentic. Since Heidemann wanted to purchase the books he knew his magazine Stern would give him the financial backing he needed, that was if he could prove to them that the diaries were authentic. So with that Heidemann went on to try and determine how Stiefel had managed to get
In her expose, Nickel and Dime, Barbara Ehrenreich shares her experience of what it is like for unskilled women to be forced to be put into the labor market after the welfare reform that was going on in 1998. Ehrenreich wanted to capture her experience by retelling her method of “uncover journalism” in a chronological order type of presentation of events that took place during her endeavor. Her methodologies and actions were some what not orthodox in practice. This was not to be a social experiment that was to recreate a poverty social scenario, but it was to in fact see if she could maintain a lifestyle working low wage paying jobs the way 4 million women were about to experience it. Although Ehrenreich makes good use of rhetoric (ethos, pathos, logos), she is very effective at portraying pathos, trying to get us to understand why we should care about a social situation such as this through, credibility, emotion, and logic.
Paul Krugman’s humorous rhetoric both entertains and informs the reader towards America’s consistent uneducated assumptions of other countries. He opens with a critical approach of the Republican Candidate, Jeb Bush and his comment about French work weeks. Krugman immediately shot down Bush’s argument and referred him as “french toast”, in order to describe the weight of the outcome on his campaign in a joking manner. He inserts an interjection and utilizes common speech to convey straight messages about his possible political standing in the presidential race and elaborates on how groundless his statements were about the French work ethic. Krugman’s sour critique then moves onto yet another Republican, Ben Carson. Although there weren’t any
“People who had incurred the displeasure of the party simply disappeared and were never heard of again.
Haffner has confronted many issues that have, according to him, been overlooked by other historians, and it is for this reason that the book is suitable for any person interested in the phenomenon that is Hitler. Haffner had a greater reason than surprise theories and new evidence for writing the book though. This is apparent throughout the book and, most notably, at the end. He is appealing to the younger generations of readers, those that did not experience Hitler themselves. It is to this group that Haffner intends to send a message. This will be discussed later.
Nicholas Kristof, a Harvard graduate who continued his education at Oxford University, has lived in and traveled to many parts of the world, allowing him have a deeper understanding and knowledge of the issues that arise as well as the conformities of cultures around the world. He settled as a columnist of the New York Times in 1984, mainly writing about economics and politics. Winning two Pulitzer Prizes, Kristof has continued his writing, but opening it up to more than just politics. He focuses on other issues such as drug problems and climate change and more in between. Although columnist Nicholas Kristof includes convincing, logical arguments through his use of facts from many reliable resources of research, his audience may impugn what he has to say because of his biased, one-sided opinions that deny the other viewpoint.
Novelist, Norman Mailer, in his narrative essay, “The Death of Benny Paret,” recounts his experience as he witnesses a first-hand account of the tragic death of the boxer, Benny Paret. Mailer’s purpose is to convince the audience that boxing is inhumane through the use of many rhetorical devices, such as simile, animalistic diction and syntax.
Writing a song is certainly a difficult task, there are many techniques used in the making of songs. The artist writes a song very carefully in order to properly convey the message to the listeners. Some songs in particular use a lot of techniques to show the listener their reason for creating the song. There are so many different themes a song can portray. “The Hall of Fame” is one of those songs. The point of this song is to inspire people going through a tough time, and show them they can get through it and become something great. The Script’s song “Hall of Fame” uses rhetorical devices in a way that makes the listener understand that in order to overcome every obstacle life has, the listener has to fight for it.
Success. Seven letters, two syllables, and essentially, the goal of almost every person to walk the planet. The interesting thing about success is that it isn’t a set in stone goal, but an ideology. With each person, success is redefined, argued, and tried. Success comes in different forms and levels, but at the end of the day every person who has been deemed successful mentions one word: failure. Yet, it isn’t failure in of itself that produces success, but the determination and desire to work through it. Failure can only indoctrinate when an individual decides to work past it and improve from it. Often, however, the strenuous process of failure and grit is glamorized, and the true factors that play into success are forgotten. For example,
In chapter nine of All Quiet on the Western Front, Remarque uses ironic diction and metaphors to demonstrate how throughout the war there are many experiences that cause a soldier to lose his innocence but none like killing someone with one’s own hands and having to live with that fact for the rest of one’s days. While on patrol, Paul Baumer hides in a shell hole for safety. Moments later a soldier from the enemy side jumps into the shell hole. Automatically, fearing for his life, Paul stabs the man in the chest, killing him. Paul finds the man’s pocketbook and reads it, “but each word [he] translate[s] pierces [him] like a shot in the chest --like a stab in the chest” (Remarque 30). The word pierces connotes a strong and painful feeling that
The tone in the first chapter is apathetic towards the treatment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. “She read the sign from top to bottom...She wrote down a few words on the back of a bank receipt then turned around and went back home to pack” (3). The lack of adjectives to describe emotion makes the woman seem as if she has already accepted her fate and cannot even feel anything. “She had not seen her husband since his arrest last December” (10). Her lack of curiosity makes the woman seem as if she does not care for her husband or his fate. After packing to leave, the mother thinks about the day in which they will leave. She thinks,“Then they would pin their identification numbers to their collars and grab their suitcases and climb up onto the bus and go to wherever it was they had to go” (22). By having the sentence structure be a long, unbroken sentence, almost
Emarque develops this theme throughout the novel by explaining how men who don't know each other can work together and get along. They do this by comparing things to each other so they can relate and show that they are all in the same situation. In the book the men have a hard time at first because they are not used to what is happening around them and war is not what they were told it would be like. It is very sad to think about how the war was back in the day because things just weren't the same way that they are now and they didn't have the weapons or the technology that we have today. In the book it was talking about world war one and it talked about some of the weapons they used, gasses,machine guns, mortars, flame throwers and many
Terrorism has been a worldwide problem this past year causing mixed feelings, anxiety, and more awareness. Political cartoons are said to be an exaggerating and categorizing opinion of a persons’ point of views. In the drawing by Nate Beeler, Trump is unfairly prejudicing Muslims which seems to be acceptable by Adolf Hitler. The exaggeration could be understandable, but the truth underlying it could just be the obvious. The artist gives the impression of saying Donald Trump’s statements and ideas leave him to be identified with Hitler. The work is representing the idea that Trump’s discriminatory views towards all Muslims, including innocent, is no different than Hitler’s ideas pertained to the innocent Jews, making them to be in the same category. The artist can cause so many opinions, emotions, and thoughts just by adding this simple character to his work.
This rhetorical analysis will explore Thomas L. Friedman’s use of stylistic devices to dispute the current state of where the post-secondary education system is in terms of where it cloud be; in the article, “The Professor’s Big Stage,” published in The New York Times, March 5, 2013. The purpose of the article is to assist students and professors to initiate an increased level of learning and to properly educate. The way the current system and delivery is taught must go beyond what it is. With this article students have a chance to become above average learners and move toward a degree and a career.
Rhetoric is the art of effective speaking or writing, and persuasion. Most people use rhetoric numerous of times in their everyday life without their concern or knowing.
Journal of a Nazi Ever since they brought us here, it was clear that it wouldn't be a