Rhetorical Analysis Of The Professor's Big Stage By Thomas Friedman

747 Words2 Pages

This rhetorical analysis will explore Thomas L. Friedman’s use of stylistic devices to dispute the current state of where the post-secondary education system is in terms of where it cloud be; in the article, “The Professor’s Big Stage,” published in The New York Times, March 5, 2013. The purpose of the article is to assist students and professors to initiate an increased level of learning and to properly educate. The way the current system and delivery is taught must go beyond what it is. With this article students have a chance to become above average learners and move toward a degree and a career.
At the beginning of the article, Friedman uses a first-hand experience to disclose examples to help engage readers in important points. Friedman reflects on a past conversation with a friend. He takes parts and uses the experiences and manipulates them into compelling examples and uses them in …show more content…

Friedman composes strong argumentative points to lend support to the overall thesis of the article. By comparing two types of education, learning in a classroom versus learning through online classes; Friedman has successfully challenged professors to improve their way of teaching. The argument then switches to the acknowledgement of counter arguments stating that many valued experiences come from the residential experience. Doing this Friedman appeals to the two sides of the argument, but in the end still proving the importance of the change of post-secondary education. Friedman uses the counter argument to build his points and make his reasoning more deep and complex. By using various methods of writing the argument, Friedman maintains a constant view on the subject through out the article. This displays an in-depth knowledge of the subject he his writing about. This leads to an overall to a cohesive article that can be read and enjoyed by many

Open Document