Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of the process of negotiation
Negotiation strategies and their strengths and weaknesses
Explain the features and uses of different approaches to negotiation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Mike Fridley knew he wanted to become a negotiator after the day he was dispatched to the scene of an armed homicide suspect. The 25-year sheriff’s office veteran said he and his partners tracked a suspect that had been on the lam from Oregon to some brush at a property in Humboldt County. “Basically, we found the guy holding a gun to his chest and he wanted us to kill himself,” Fridley said, explaining the situation in which people try to force law enforcement officer’s hand into opening fire as “suicide by cop.” But the man didn’t force Fridley’s hand; instead, he was able to talk him down and get him to surrender. From that point, Fridley knew he wanted to become a crisis negotiator, so he began training for it, and spent about 15 years working his way to his current position as the lead on the sheriff’s office’s Crisis Negotiation Team. …show more content…
They come from different departments within the office and they all like talking to people, Fridley said. “It’s not something that you can really teach someone,” he said. “You’ve got to have the skills to talk to someone and keep them going.” Team members do still get training that aims to teach them how to work during a negotiation. They practice talking over a specialized phone that is tossed to a suspect during a negotiation. During the call one person takes the lead in the conversation, another listens to help analyze the conversation and a third acts as a scribe, Fridley said. “It’s like any conversation, eventually you might be at a loss so the other person on the line will help and might feed you talking points or alert you to triggers — what sets the person off,” Fridley
The police responded to a tip that a home was being used to sell drugs. When they arrived at the home, Gant answered the door and stated that he expected the owner to return home later. The officers left and did a record check of Gant and found that his driver’s license had been suspended and there was a warrant for his arrest. The officers returned to the house later that evening and Gant wasn’t there. Gant returned shortly and was recognized by officers. He parked at the end of the driveway and exited his vehicle and was placed under arrest 10 feet from his car and was placed in the back of the squad car immediately. After Gant was secured, two officers searched his car and found a gun and a bag of cocaine.
The Case of Arizona v. Hicks took place in 1986; the case was decided in 1987. It began on April 18th 1984, with a bullet that was shot through the floor in Hick’s apartment; it had injured a man in the room below him. An investigation took place. Officers were called to the scene. They entered Mr. Hicks’ apartment and discovered three weapons and a black stocking mask.
Arizona V. Hicks discusses the legal requirements law enforcement needs to meet to justify the search and seizure of a person’s property under the plain view doctrine. The United States Supreme Court delivered their opinion of this case in 1987, the decision is found in the United States reports, beginning on page 321, of volume 480. This basis of this case involves Hicks being indicted for robbery, after police found stolen property in Hick’s home during a non-related search of the apartment. Hicks had accidentally discharged a firearm into the apartment below him, injuring the resident of that apartment. Police responded and searched Hicks apartment to determine the identity of the shooter, recover the weapon, and to locate other victims.
In the case of McKinley v. City of Mansfield, 404 F.3d 418 (2005), there was an internal investigation of the police department of “improper use of police scanners to eavesdrop on cordless phones and cellphones” (Diagle, 2012 para.10), which involved many officers. Police officer McKinley was interviewed two times. The first time McKinley was interviewed it was about the investigation, and the second time was about allegations that he was untruthful during the first interview, both times he was questioned he was under the Garrity Warnings. By the time of the second interview, McKinley was already “under criminal investigation for lying” (Diagle, 2012, para. 10), and during the second interview it was made clear to McKinley that it was about
One of the Judicial Branch’s many powers is the power of judicial review. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to decide whether or not the other branches of governments’ actions are constitutional or not. This power is very important because it is usually the last hope of justice for many cases. This also allows the court to overturn lower courts’ rulings. Cases like Miranda v. Arizona gave Miranda justice for having his rules as a citizen violated. The court evalutes whether any law was broken then makes their ruling. Also, the Weeks v. United States case had to be reviewed by the court because unlawful searches and siezures were conducted by officers. One of the most famous cases involving judicial review was the Plessey v. Ferguson
...is novel with an outstanding salute to those who serve in law enforcement saying, “And so I tip my hat to all the good cops throughout our nation who risk their lives and strive to do the right thing when facing split-second decisions about life and death every day in the kill zone” (Klinger, 2004, page 274). Pulling the trigger of a gun can cause a variety of issues both within and outside of a police officer’s life, but it could also potentially save another human being from harm and keep the safety of our society intact.
Miranda vs. Arizona Miranda vs. Arizona was a case that considered the rights of the defendants in criminal cases in regards to the power of the government. Individual rights did not change with the Miranda decision, however it created new constitutional guidelines for law enforcement, attorneys, and the courts. The guidelines ensure that the individual rights of the fifth, sixth and the fourteenth amendment are protected. This decision requires that unless a suspect in custody has been informed of his constitutional rights before questioning, anything he says may not be introduced in a court of law. The decision requires law enforcement officers to follow a code of conduct when arresting suspects.
...mples the article provided as role models when I negotiate with other people in my professional and personal life. By analyzing the approaches employed by the various negotiators I was able to observe their ethical worldviews, their comprehension of the balance of power and ethics in negotiations, and the respect that these Samurai negotiators displayed for their counterparts during the negotiation process. Virtue in the negotiation process can become a powerful tool by those who choose to employ it. “All a person’s ways seem pure to them, but motives are weighed by the Lord” (Pr. 16:2).
Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1991. Print.
In the year 1170 King Henry II created what is known as the Inquest of Sheriffs. When taking a closer look at this this document, it is obvious that it is a significant artefact of the medieval time period. By performing a thorough analysis of this source, one can easily see that it is filled with rich information on the time period in which it was written in. Not only does it allow us to see into medieval times, but it also gives us valuable information on society. Through this close reading, this essay will address the events leading up to the composition of the document, the context in which the Inquest of Sheriffs was written in, who demanded it, and why it came to be.
Each of us has to face tough negotiation with an irritable spouse, an ornery boss, a rigid salesperson, or a tricky customer. Under stress, even kind, reasonable people turn into angry, intractable opponents.
Negotiation, as we’ve learned, is the process of communicating where parties can discuss problems and/or targets and attempt to solve them via dialogue in order to reach a resolution. While many individuals feel successful negotiations are due to a natural skill, the truth behind reaching a prime agreement is preparation. You need to know the issue, know yourself, and know your party. This type of preparation also includes knowing your needs and limits, understanding what the other party wants and anticipating their limits, asking the right questions, and being creative in your counteroffers.
In many scenarios, police officers are not given enough time to make the rational decision between who lives and who dies. When a person’s survival is at risk, it is not uncommon for the body to enter fight or flight mode. Lindsey Betromen, author of the article “Responding with Fight or Flight” states, “The fight or flight syndrome
...w to apply these tactics into practice. Understanding the meaning of each tactics is just the first stage, flexibility in the use of appropriate tactics in future issues is more important. Besides, I need to make a detailed plan before the negotiation. Firstly, analyzing the interests, perspectives and weak points of the opposite side and selecting suitable tactics. Secondly, preparing several response strategies will help me to control the situations. Thirdly, setting the minimum level what I can agree on the issue is also essential part of negotiation.
Hostage negotiation is as much of an art as it is a science. The negotiator not only holds the lives of the victims in his hands, but the lives of law enforcement and the hostage taker as well. His persuasiveness and communication abilities have the power to protect and save lives.