Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis theory
Criticism of sigmund freud theory
Freud's impact on psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis theory
Freudian Literary Criticism Like Marx, Freud's theories have provided literary critics with an interpretive structure with a level of meaning and significance left unspoken or undeveloped by Freud himself. Freud used theoretical language for a quantifiable therapeutic end: a rational understanding of the mind. Art was merely a sublimated form of the childish desire to play. "Might we not say that every child at play behaves like a creative writer?" (Freud 651). Rather than founding its ideas upon the assumption that all art is escapist and unhealthy, and all artists being essentially neurotic, Freudian literary criticism dedicates itself to the examination of the theoretical vernacular he applies to the human mind. In defining the aspects of the unconscious mind, the pleasure principle, the repetition-compulsion, Freud implies that the mind is a metaphor making machine. "Freud discovered in the very organization of the mind those mechanisms by which art makes its effects...which makes poetry indigenous to the very constitution of the mind" (Trilling 17). By examining literature within these parameters, Freudian critics hope to better understand and explicate the fundamental connection between personal consciousness and art. Works Cited Freud, Sigmund. "Creative Writers and Daydreaming" The Critical Tradition. Ed., David H. Richter, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1989. Trilling, Lionel. "Freud and Literature" The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: Viking Press, 1968.
“Do you count on your own tomorrow?” This is a simple yes or no question, but the answer is based highly on a person’s beliefs, morals, and worldviews. Sigmund Freud and C.S. Lewis were two of the greatest minds of the twentieth century, and the two join together in the play, Freud’s Last Session. Sigmund Freud was born in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1856. Supporter or non-supporter, everyone agrees that Freud was one of the most influential scientists of the 20th century. Freud focused mostly on the interaction of the conscious and unconscious mind. Not only did he transform psychology; he transformed the way people view themselves and the way they think about their lives (A Science Odyssey). Unlike Freud’s secular and atheistic view of the world, the other great mind, C.S. Lewis, viewed the world in a spiritual way.
“Deprived of the right word or the appropriate phrasing, Freud’s thoughts become not merely coarse or oversimplified but seriously distorted” (9). The English translations fail to capture Freud’s true meaning of his writings. F...
Psychoanalytic Theory itself has, what seems to be, two contradictory halves: Freudian psychoanalysis and Lacanian psychoanalysis. The first half focuses solely on the author and the unconscious mind; the second considers the unconscious, but prefers to concentrate on outside influences by deconstructing the text itself. According to Freud, interpretation is achieved by examining conflicts and symbols, such as Freudian slips and dream images. These outlets are help to determine whether an individual’s external behavior coincides (or conflicts) with their internal emotion. Freud placed emphasis on sexuality and the Oedipus complex, which is the idea of repressed sexual feelings toward a parent of opposite sex. He also defined three levels of the subconscious mind: the ego, the super-ego, and the id. Barry explains that the stages align with “the consciousness, the conscience, and the unconscious” respectively (93). On the other hand, Lacan, a follower of Freud, concentrated on the relationship between an author and his or her work. He claimed the two were inexorably connected, that objectivity is nonexistent. In an essence: an author’s personality is used to interpret the text and, in contrast, the text is used to gain insight about the author. Regardless of the emphasis, psychoanalytic criticism engages an
Jones, E. (1953, 1955, 1957) Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, Volume I, II, III. New York: Basic Books.
Freud, Sigumund. "The Uncanny." Literary Theory: An Anthology. Ed. by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. New York: Blackwell, 1998.
Wolf, Ernest S. "Psychoanalytic Psychology of the Self and Literature." New Literary History. 12.1 (1980): 41-60. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
Freud, Sigmund. The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud Ed. & Trans. Dr. A. A. Brill. New York: Random House, 1938.
Freud, Sigmund. An Outline of Psycho-Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1969.
Just as Freud used literature as a foundation, or backbone, to support his psychoanalytical theories, literary writers have used Freudian psychoanalysis to build upon literature. As a result, novelists, like Toni Morrison, have often adopted and modified Freudian psychoanalysis. Specifically, Joe Trace reveals the possibilities of psychological variation and promotes a case specific reality in which psychological universals, while being relevant, prove to be narrow and limited in assessing the psychological interiors of fictional characters.
low. ''If he wants to speak to me he knows where to find me! But I'm
Thus, Freud’s article does not give substantial answers and many things remain open for exploration and research. No doubts, his arguments are tangible and useful, but as much as he tries to go beyond and dig deeper, he still cannot fully defend them.
Freud’s conception of the mind is characterized by primarily by dynamism, seen in the distribution of psychic energy, the interplay between the different levels of consciousness, and the interaction between the various functions of the mind. The single function of the mind, which brings together these various aspects, is repression, the maintenance of what is and what isn’t appropriately retained in the conscious mind.
Barry’s book discusses the major literary criticisms and theories within them. Within this particular chapter, Barry focuses on Freud’s work on the unconscious and its influence on the actions of individuals. Barry draws concentrate on repression and the idea that this “forgetting” of conflicts contributes to desires ultimately being “forced” out. This source is especially important as it blatantly expresses the phenomenon that occurs with Arthur Dimmesdale. Peter Barry, an expert on literary theory, is a member of the Higher Education Academy, the Fellowship Committee of the English Association, and was recently elected as a Fellow of the English Association.
The psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud spent much of his life exploring the workings of the unconscious. Freud's work has influenced society in ways which we take for granted. When we speak of Freudian slips or look for hidden causes behind irrational behavior, we are using aspects of Freudian analysis. Many literary critics have also adopted Freud's various theories and methods. In order to define Freudian literary criticism, we will examine how various critics approach Freud's work. We will pay special attention to issues of creativity , author psychology , and psycho-biography .
Freud also emphasizes that artists own extraordinary abilities that put them apart from the neurotic personality. This special genius not only allows the artist to overcome, at least partly, personal conflicts and repressions, but also makes it possible for the audience or readers to gain comfort from their own unconscious sources of fulfillment which had until that time become unreachable to them. Thus, literature and art, distinct from dreams and neuroses, may serve the artist as a mode of fantasy that opens “the way back to