Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Happiness in the brave new world
Brave new world happiness
Lack of happiness in brave new world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Happiness in the brave new world
The society in Brave New World is centered around happiness and self-pleasure. The citizens are conditioned from birth to believe that the meaning of life is to be as happy as possible for as long as possible. John, the savage from the reservation, is what we today would consider a “normal human being”. At one point in the story, John says, “But I don’t want comfort. I want God. I want poetry. I want real danger. I want freedom. I want goodness. I want sin.” He does not enjoy the current ideologies of the current world. John’s natural humanity makes him desire the imperfections of life. Mustapha Mond says that John is “claiming the right to be unhappy.” All of these items listed are considered controversial in the Brave New World society, and are connected to suffering and unhappiness.
Freedom is just one of the many things that John listed, but I believe it is a very important idea. At first, you may think that freedom equals happiness. This correlation makes sense because with ideal freedom, you are not controlled or pushed around by anyone but yourself. You get to make all decisions on your own and with only your own wants and needs to consider. While this seems perfect, freedom also causes incredible suffering - for yourself, and for others. For example, if you have
…show more content…
complete freedom and you have the choice to sentence a criminal to death, it is totally up to you to kill this human or let them continue their crime against society. Another example of suffering caused by freedom is how it can contradict itself. In order to have “complete freedom” in society, everyone needs to be able to anything that they desire. However, this is impossible. In this scenario, anyone can prevent anyone else from committing an action, because they can do anything, but the person being hindered also has the freedom to do anything. Do you see the problem? Lastly, a byproduct of freedom is complexity. When situations and choices are simpler, people tend to be happier because there is less indecision. When you take away freedom, no one has to worry about which choice to make, if there are very limited options, or none at all. The second idea that sticks out to me is that of “real danger”. If you ask about their opinion on it, most people will say that they dislike danger. This is because it is tied to suffering, pain, and general hardship. John desires danger because it would allow the world to seem more mortal. The goal of life is to live as long as possible, as happy as possible. The people in Brave New World are used to the “cushion” of society. They have almost nothing to fear and simply live for sex and overall happiness. When choosing “real danger” over a nearly perfect, safe life, you are accepting a few consequences. Suffering can come not from danger itself, but from the uncertainty of danger. You never know if today is your last day, or if you are about to make a huge mistake in your life. This constant uncertainty will eat away at your sanity and cause paranoia. Danger can also affect you through the people around you. Knowing that your friends are in constant danger will have the same effect as I previously mentioned, but also in a different way. If your friends are in danger, and you end up losing one or more of them to an accident, you are directly affected emotionally. This is more suffering. Also danger can obviously affect you through the accidents that happen as a result. There is no way to claim “real danger” without also claiming unhappiness. In conclusion, I believe that is unsurprising for John to desire these qualities of life.
He was not grown and raised in the twisted society of Brave New World. These traits are a part of our society today, so we should not have a hard time imagining his view towards them. Mustapha Mond does not understand how we can accept the unhappiness that these things bring into our lives, while still enjoying ourselves. This is one of the biggest ways that the Brave New World society is flawed. The reality is that no matter how “unhappy” these aspects of life are, life as we know it is no longer the same without them. We cannot function without these key ideals governing our
lives.
“You shall have joy, or you shall have power, said God; you shall not have both” (Ralph Emerson) Power is what Mustapha Mond chose; he gave up his joy and dreams, for ultimate power. Mustapha thought a perfect world did not need humanity; all it needed was stability and happiness. In order to get this social stability, it was required to have some sacrifices; like art, science, religion, and life. For this very reason Mustapha stood out, his ideas and philosophy were wrong. He basically helped create a more advanced version of Cuba. Mustapha Mond was portrayed as Fidel Castro. A very powerful person, who controlled everyone, and everything, constructed a world in which human beings had only one way of behaving, like action figures, whatever they say or do is all programmed into them. Mustapha stood out because he is depicted as teacher. The teacher has all the power; everyone listens and follows instructions. The teacher makes the rules and if someone breaks a rule they get punished or in this case exiled or isolated. Controller is what is and power is what he has, Mustapha Mond.
...an to want more from his environment and through looking at what the rest of the world had to offer it caused him to desire change and growth and to search for it. What he had compared to others was not satisfying, not good enough, causing him to despise what he had.
The thrill he feels for merely surviving portrays his fascination with living life deliberately, shedding the unnecessary things that prohibit one from really living. Although his parents and the people he met along the way empathized with McCandless’ struggles, the undeniable truth is that he reveled in being nomadic, as evidenced by the notes he had written and the quotes he had underlined in his books. Furthermore, McCandless constantly craved for adventure and uncertainty. With the immensity of his country accompanied by strong desires, he found that his purpose in life was to have “an endlessly changing horizon” (Krakauer 57). McCandless strongly believes that the joys in life radiate from one’s confrontation with new experiences.
When John was brought to the Brave New World, his inhibitions were happening by other people right in front of him. He saw sex as a common occurrence, and nobody really had any emotion toward it. Everyone enjoyed it, but not spiritually. In sense, sex did not light an eternal flame for the Brave New World like it did in the savage reservation. A piece of a mother and father could be put together for a child in the savage society, but in the Brave New World, everyone had their own life. There were no personal relationships, and there was no love. Also, drugs were looked down upon by the reservation, and yet, in the Brave New World, drugs, specifically soma, are the food for life. Instead of living through rough situations, society went on soma holidays for their problems.
God has given us as human beings free will. Although if we make choices based on our own free will we must be willing to take the responsibility for the effects that our decisions have on ourselves, on the people around us, and on society itself. Freedom, I believe, is the way in which people live or behave without others annoying or interfering in his or her affairs. People should benefit from freedom, equality and justice. Absolute freedom is sometimes very dangerous and may destroy the basic principles of the society. A lot of people believe that freedom means doing whatever you want, whenever you want.
significance of the works. The Brave new world tries to destroy any of human emotion, which is why
In order to preserve the structure of humanity, people must have freedom of expression, free will, and equality. Any attempt to create an utopia must respect, honor, and nourish these human needs; for without them the society will eventually become a dystopia. An analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry, proves that any social structure that hopes to achieve utopia must insure that the citizens have their basic needs met, opportunities to pursue personal goals and dreams, and freedom to be unique.
David Grayson once said that "Commandment Number One of any truly civilized society is this: Let people be different". Difference, or individuality, however, may not be possible under a dictatorial government. Aldous Huxley's satirical novel Brave New World shows that a government-controlled society often places restraints upon its citizens, which results in a loss of social and mental freedom. These methods of limiting human behavior are carried out by the conditioning of the citizens, the categorical division of society, and the censorship of art and religion.
In conclusion, freedom is having power to inflict a positive change on the world. The ability to be yourself and not change for anyone. The right to choose who rules and who doesn’t rule. Having a chance to get out there and show the world what your all about and who you really are. These are all definitions of freedom and what it truly means to be
In the brave new world, the society is based off of the motto, “Community, identity, [and] stability” (Huxley 3). In this supposed Utopian society, people being content with their jobs and being a contributor to the process of consumption drive their happiness. People are satisfied with dying because they know their bodies will be cremated and used for fertilizer. Citizens are happy because they believe it is “fine to think we can go on being socially useful even after we’re dead. Making plants grow” (Huxley 73). All of the people are under a false impression of happiness because they do not realize how much the Director and higher authorities manipulate them. They do not realize how much they really cannot do. They do not realize how much they do not about their lives and life around them. All the people think about is consumption and how it serves as happiness. The citizens are too ignorant and blind to the fact that they are only living to be a part of the assembly line, and that is their only purpose. John is the only character that is sickened by the assembly line and sees how disturbing life in the new world is. He is the only one who realizes how much control the Director has over the society and how people do not even have the ability think for themselves. He sees this fabricated happiness in play, and it makes him start to violently retch in disgust at this so-called
Mustapha Mond is the most powerful character in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Mond keeps scientific and historic documents from reaching the people. Mond believes that science, religion, and art threaten Brave New World if let out, but religion would be bane of Brave New World.
Throughout history freedom has had many different meanings and definitions; based on race, gender, and ethnicity. According to the dictionary freedom means the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint (“freedom” def. 1). Freedom may seem like something given to everyone however it was something workers had to fight for. Not everyone believed that workers’ rights needed to be changed, which led to a long battle between workers, employers and the government. To the working class people freedom meant making higher wages, having regulated hours, workable conditions and the right to free speech.
Freedom is often spoken of in what can be referred to as a loose sense of the word. One country has more freedom than another; a twenty-one year old has more freedom than a fifteen year old. What exactly does this word mean? For different people it may mean different things, but there has to be an equilibrium that can be reached in order to determine the meaning of freedom itself. In one form, freedom can mean that a person has "exemption from an obligation."* If only the root (free) is looked at, it can be interpreted that one is "not under the control or power of another."*
So freedom is indeed valuable. Not many argues against the nonindependent value of freedom, since there are a lot of values for which freedom is essential. In my view, freedom is independently also valuable, because we might not know exactly what good is it going to do for us, but
Freedom is a human value that has inspired many poets, politicians, spiritual leaders, and philosophers for centuries. Poets have rhapsodized about freedom for centuries. Politicians present the utopian view that a perfect society would be one where we all live in freedom, and spiritual leaders teach that life is a spiritual journey leading the soul to unite with God, thus achieving ultimate freedom and happiness. In addition, we have the philosophers who perceive freedom as an inseparable part of our nature, and spend their lives questioning the concept of freedom and attempting to understand it (Transformative Dialogue, n.d.).