Freedom In America Essay

Matthew Rebera
Analytical Essay

Freedom is an inherent right which individuals have since their birth. Freedom is not something that can be seen or felt. All this gives an unclear impression about freedom. What accurately does freedom mean? Diverse people have diverse beliefs, description and outlooks about the notion of freedom. Some talk about freedom in governmental sense, some talk about societal or social freedom, some talk about individual individuality and some define it as religious freedom. But the fact that everyone wants to live in a place where they can be free, holds true in all cases. Throughout the progression of American history, freedom has made its way into our everyday lives. But that wasn’t the case every time. American

Since the end of the Civil War, African-Americans have fought to use their full rights that they were promised in the Constitution. The 14th Amendment, which established nationwide residency, was passed in 1866. All African Americans believed with the establishment of civil privileges, they would be allowed to do what all Americans could do. In the setting of civil rights, freedom means to be free from oppression. The whole development took much longer than they probably ever anticipated. Many escaped from the south to gain their liberty, which was lawfully guaranteed to them by the constitution. Legal servitude was not prominent in the North, but the population of slaves between the first liberation and the end of the Civil war increased dramatically. It went from roughly two million in 1827 to over 4 million in 1865. It was

Japanese Americans were treated severely because Americans turned their rage on Japanese Americans for a wrongdoing that was enacted by the Japanese. The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, and this act made Americans hate and fear them. America's panic of another occurrence triggered the moving of Japanese Americans to internment camps. The internment of Japanese Americans was shameful and excessive. But not everyone held the belief that Japanese Americans were a threat to American society. Justice Robert Jackson's dissent said that "defense measures will not, and often should not, be held within the limits that bind civil authority in peace," and that it would possibly be irrational to hold the military, who supplied the order, to the same morals and ethics of the constitution that apply to everyone