Free Will In Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

960 Words2 Pages

Imagine a world in which humanity is equal and individuality is oppressed. In this world intelligence and the gifts God gave you are frowned upon. Where the government rules supreme over all who breath. In the story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, we get a look into a future in which this could be the downfall of humanity. In the story we see that strong, intelligent, and attractive people have “handicaps” that make them as short sighted as everyone else.

In Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut we see how equality isn’t always a good thing. People have things called “handicaps” that reduce their intelligence and physical abilities if they are above average. This is a mistake because if people are not allowed to think for themselves then …show more content…

Subsequently the fact that equality isn’t always a good thing is not the only thing that comes to mind while on the topic of free will and choice when it comes to the story Harrison Bergeron. Another would be that if humanity were able to think and reach their full potential, they could help those who can’t. An example of this in the text is a description in the story about George and Hazel Bergeron (Harrison Bergeron’s parents) and how they are being kept from reaching their full potential.
“It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their …show more content…

We’ve seen time after time in history when people have the right to choose, they choose wrong. Even renowned authors like Lois Lowry who wrote The Giver have taken note of this and how negatively society could turn out if we are allowed to make our own decisions and choose for ourselves. But if that's the case then who is worthy to choose? Who will make the decisions for us? We are all human, so for us to control each other is hypocritical to ourselves. The only one who could make the decisions for us would be God himself and even he chose to give us the right to choose for ourselves. Obviously if the one who created us think that we should be able to choose for ourselves then maybe we

Open Document