Imagine a society where not a single person competes with another. It has been like this for years, yet nothing has changed since the start of this new world. No new technology, no new occupations, no new discoveries. Absolutely nothing is different. Without competition no one will push themselves to be better or to achieve any goals, and without new achievements society cannot survive, let alone thrive. The short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. discusses this topic. Set in a society where anyone above average in any way is handicapped, therefore everyone is completely and totally equal. One handicapped man, George’s, son is taken away by the government at the mere age of fourteen under suspicion of rebellious intentions. Another …show more content…
piece of writing that discusses the pros and cons of competition is June Kronholz’s article “Competition Makes a Comeback” where she speaks of opposing views on competition and the contestants of bees and bowls all across the country. With competition people are pushed to better themselves in order to excel and grow, making competition necessary for high achievement. People feel a need to push themself as far as they can go and achieve goals while in a competitive state, enforcing the idea that competition is necessary.
In the story “Harrison Bergeron” a live broadcast is interrupted by Harrison Bergeron [George’s son] himself, freeing the people listening of their society and dancing away with a talented ballerina: “And then, in an explosion of joy and grace, into the air they sprang! Not only were the laws of the land abandoned, but the laws of gravity and the laws of motion as well.” (Vonnegut 4). Once the government’s boundaries of full equality were taken away for a quick moment Harrison and a ballerina were able to excel, be free, and cross boundaries of science. Because these people were no longer held from showing their talent they were able to improve their skill after years of no improvement. Without being able to show talents to the people around one there is no competition, but without that competition one can not improve or express joy from what they are doing. For example, in today’s society if computer brands stopped competing to have the best and newest product our technology would not advance at all, nor would the computer engineer’s mind and skill. Competition creates many forms of external motivation and with that taken away …show more content…
only the small fraction of people with internal motivation will be able to improve. In “Competition Makes a Comeback” the children of higher knowledge are becoming bored in school without competition: “Kids looking for a challenge may have to look outside their schools, adds Tomlinson, because ‘classrooms haven’t engaged anyone for a whole academic generation now.” (Kronholz 16). When children, or adults are not faced with competition and challenges they don’t feel a need to try hard, therefore seeping down to lower levels. These kids have that intrinsic motivation, so they put themselves in competitive situations when other people do not do that for them, but the many people in society who don’t have that just live without challenges and bring the others down. When one society goes in the wrong direction, down instead of up, the world can not come together and function as a whole, just like a company building a computer without space for memory. Because of competition subconsciously putting people in more determined and focused states, people can improve themselves and add to a society allowing it to function. Although competition pushes people to try harder some may argue that competition is not necessary because it puts people down and causes large ammounts of stress.While there are, evedently, moments of stress and discouragement,it has been proven plenty of times before that high stress levels increase the force pushing people to try, and while being discouraged is never a good feeling, feeling it makes one never want to feel it again, yet another way to push one to do better.
In the moment neither of these feelings are amazing but in “Competition Makes a Comeback”, Caitlin Snaring shares that this was actually results in an outcome that is well worth it: “‘Losing made me want to win even more… got me fired up’ to win the 2007 contest.” (Kronholz 18). Because Caitlin felt upset after being eliminated at a 2006 geography bee, she realized that she didn’t want to feel like this again, and the only way for that to happen is to push even harder to reach goals. Without failure against others people assume they are the best or they are just a natural winner so they don’t need to try. This mindset automatically sets society up for failure, because with everyone just sitting back waiting for a trophy to be handed to them for anything and everything nothing would get done, and there is no way for everyone in a society to all win one way. Just imagine a computer engineer thinking they can release a computer that is only a small percent finished just because people loved their last
computer, so they no longer have to try. Just like without competition, without failure people assume they no longer have to put any time, effort, or thought into anything they do. Because when there is a feeling of competition, there is a feeling of needing to better oneself to grow, competition is necessary for high achievement. If computer companies or just regular societies no longer felt needs to be higher up on a chart than others like them, the people and their world as a whole would fail. Without the extrinsic motivation that comes from competition, intrinsic motivation would not grow and people would expect to always win. Competition is never not a good thing. People who don’t enjoy competition are the people who are fine with just being okay while others are pushing and striving against others to succeed.
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living. The short novel “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut presents a futuristic portrayal of a world where everyone is equal in every way possible. In “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut displays the clear flaws in society that lead to the creation of a horrific dystopia that lacks genuine human emotions, fails to develop as a civilized community and is strictly government
Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” Kurt Vonnegut portrays Aristotle’s philosophy brilliantly in his short story “Harrison Bergeron.” The story depicts the American government in the future mandating physical handicaps in an attempt to make everyone equal. Vonnegut describes a world where no one is allowed to excel in the areas of intelligence, athletics, or beauty. Yet, the inequalities among the people shine even brighter. Vonnegut uses satire to explore the question of whether true equality can ever really exist.
Being unique is a necessary part of life. People are told starting as children that they need to be themselves. They are told to do what they love and love what they do. What if the world didn’t allow this? Kurt Vonnegut ponders the idea of a life in which the government enforces complete equality. “Harrison Bergeron” takes place in a future society that hinders people with skills to make everyone equal. This society makes everyone worse instead of better. Complete equality has too many issues for it to be viable. Equality should be for all in the eyes of the law. However, complete equality should not be pursued because taking away the differences between people is a clear mistake.
For instance, in the article “The Case Against Competition,” Kohn states that competition stands for a particular group or people can succeed, consequently everybody else must fail while doing so. “The best amount of competition for our children is none at all” (2014), moreover, being competitive may bring low
Kurt Vonnegut’s science fiction, short story, “Harrison Bergeron” satirizes the defective side of an ideal, utopian American society in 2081, where “everyone was finally equal” (Vonnegut 1). When you first begin to read “Harrison Bergeron”, through an objective, nonchalant voice of the narrator, nothing really overly suggests negativity, yet the conclusion and the narrator's subtle description of the events show how comically tragic it really is. Vonnegut’s use of morbid satire elicits a strong response from the readers as it makes you quickly realize that this scenario does not resemble a utopian society at all, but an oppressive, government and technology-controlled society. “A dystopian society is a
Kohn’s claim about the nature of competition is true to the extent that being better than someone will never be enough and it is destructive to base one’s success on another person’s failure. However, competition could potentially serve as a drive to push someone to their fullest potential,
Each person has different characteristics about them that give them their own identity and that should not be changed. In the story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character, Harrison Bergeron is known as a threat to society. He is very intelligent, handsome, and athletic. In 2081, every person in the United States is equal. The government has taken over and has required everyone to wear handicaps to make them less smart, less pretty, less strong, and many other things. At the beginning of the story they mention a husband and wife, George and Hazel Bergeron, and they have a son, Harrison, who gets taken away because of his perfections. Later in the story, Hazel and George are watching ballerinas on television, when the program is interrupted by breaking news. They inform the viewers that Harrison has broken out of jail. The program then turns back on and Harrison appears on stage with the ballerinas. He proceeds to take off every
For those unfamiliar with Kurt Vonnegut’s writings, many of them are categorized as “science-fiction”, however, many of his stories are not too far from reality. One example of this is Vonnegut’s short story “Harrison Bergeron”. The story illustrates the dangers that lay in trying to form a perfect utopian society. The story shows how total equality can have detrimental consequences. The story revolves around a central theme that creating total equality can be dangerous for society.
Short stories throughout time have come with many different purposes. Authors have used them to entertain readers, to give insight into their own mind, and to make commentaries on society in general in many cases. An author widely renowned for his use of short stories to achieve the latter goal is Kurt Vonnegut, especially known for his social satire “Harrison Bergeron”, which he used as a commentary on both authoritarian governments and people who believed in creating “true” equality through leveling.
Being unique is a necessary part of life. People are told from being children to adults that they need to be themselves. They are told to do what they love and love what they do. What if the world didn’t allow this? Kurt Vonnegut ponders the idea of a life in which the government enforces complete equality. “Harrison Bergeron” takes place in a future society that hinders people with skills to make everyone equal. This society makes everyone worse instead of better. People having skills and differences is key to life. Equality should be for all in the eyes of the law, however people must be allowed to be unique and have different skills.
In Harrison, competition is looked at as a major cause of destruction. The handicaps are put in place to try to prevent the Dark Ages again by making sure nobody can compete with each other. The General shoots Harrison as an attempt to stop him from encouraging competition and destroying the system they put in place . Due to the extreme measures the government took, everyone attempts to take away the competition. An example of this is shown when Hazel’s encourages a stuttering news reporter by saying “at least he tried”. In today’s society, signs that competition is a major cause of destruction are beginning to show. One example is that some people believe the wrong person was chosen for president and are trying to prevent him from taking office. Today, people will go to extremes to please themselves. Cheating is a good example, seeing how some people will try to disable others to win. Competition is becoming less important, however. At some sports with younger kids, no trophies are given or, in other instances, they will reward everyone with a
If we did not fail or lose how could we learn to value or appreciate success/winning? What would we work towards, strive for or struggle with if we won all the time? What would motivate or drive us to do better or want better for ourselves if there was no concept of competition? If we are only recognized for attendance or participation because there is nothing beyond what’s actually handed to us, then all of society would come to a screeching halt. It goes beyond childhood, we are shaping the society for the future
What would actually happen if everyone was forced to be equal? Kurt Vonnegut envisioned the fatal outcome in his masterpiece, “Harrison Bergeron.” The story illustrates “what would happen if a government or some other power takes this notion serious” (Mowery). The protagonist, Harrison, who is arrest for “exuberant individuality,” escapes from prison and goes on national television station to declare himself emperor, only later to be killed by the handicap general Diane Moon. In “Harrison Bergeron,” Kurt Vonnegut satirizes the movement toward egalitarianism and the effect of television on people.
“Harrison Bergeron” a short story by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., takes place in a totalitarian society where everyone is equal. A man who tries to play the savior, but ultimately fails in his endeavors to change the world. Vonnegut short story showed political views on communism, which is that total equality is not good (and that equity might be better).
When a person or group of people join a distinct opposition towards someone or something, it is discrimination. People are inadequately affected through hate and criticism because of the unique differences we each hold as human beings. In the short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, he presents us with the mental vision of Tall Poppy Syndrome. These circumstances could negatively attribute to our government being detrimental to our future society by indoctrinating equality within the nation.