Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does standardized testing affect students academic performance
Overall effects of standardized testing
Standardized testing is important to measure student achievement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Freakonomics explores multiple circumstances and the difference between correlation and causation. A standout question that the authors delve into asks, “What Do Schoolteachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common?” (15). The authors begin with the Chicago Public School system and standardized testing. The CPS (Chicago Public School system) placed elementary and secondary schools with low test scores on probation, who then “face[ed] the threat of being shut down” (22). As one can realize, some teachers would do everything in their power to avoid low test scores, even cheating. Fortunately for teachers, “teacher cheating is rarely looked for, hardly ever detected, and just about never punished” (23). Teachers in the CPS who received low test …show more content…
To find cheating teachers, cheating algorithms processed the answers of every CPS student taking the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and flagged classrooms whose students miraculously all marked the same bubbles for certain strings of answers. Looking at one example, Classroom A, fifteen of the twenty students answered the same six consecutive questions right and for four different reasons, explained in the book. The CPS suspected one hundred twenty teachers of cheating and retested those specific classrooms. CPS discovered many cheating teachers, who CPS promptly fired, and the teachers CPS suspected of cheating, but could not prove cheated, received warnings. The rampant cheating by teachers in CPS brings one to the question, what do cheating teachers and sumo wrestlers hold in common? Unfortunately, they both cheat. Out of all the sumo wrestlers in Japan, only the top sixty-six, who make up the sumo elite, rake in enough dough to sustain themselves. These top sixty-six wrestlers participate in six tournaments a year. Every tournament, “each wrestler has fifteen bouts…one per day over fifteen consecutive days. If he finishes the tournament with a winning record (eight victories or better), his ranking will rise. If he has a losing record, his ranking falls. If it falls far enough, he is booted from the elite rank
Summary In chapter one of Freakonomics, the beginning portion of the chapter discusses information and the connection it shares with the Ku Klux Klan and real-estate agents. The Ku Klux Klan was founded right after the Civil War, in order to persecute and subdue the slaves that were newly freed. The popularity of the Klan increased in the early 20th century, around the time of World War I. In the late 19th century, the Klan had only discriminated, persecuted, and subdued Blacks, but in the 20th century they did these things to Blacks, Jews, and Gypsies.
Written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, Freakonomics is built upon three major philosophies: incentives are the fundamentals of life, experts on a subject use their knowledge as an advantage to serve their own wellbeing, and orthodox wisdom is wrong most of the time. This book goes into detail to explain the mindsets of humans, from school teachers to sumo wrestlers, through statistics. Levitt and Dubner claim that when the data is closely examined it can relate to more concepts than originally hypothesized. The style of this informative piece is very precise yet, at the same time, very concise and to the point. The tone carried throughout the book is informative and knowledgeable. The authors use distinct tactics to get points across
It’s no surprise that there are faults within our schools in today’s society. As both authors’ point out if our educational system is
Cheating can be a common routine in a classroom—from copying work on homework to copying answers on a test. “Cheating by teachers and administrators on standardized tests is rare, and not a reason to stop testing America's children” (Standardized Tests). This statement is proved false by the fact that thirty-seven states have been caught cheating by “encouraging teachers to view upcoming test forms before they are administered” (“FairTest Press Release: Standardized Exam Cheating in 37 States And D.C., New Report Shows Widespread Test Score Corruption”). If teachers can view a test before it is administered, they can teach to the test so that their students’ scores are higher. Teachers who have viewed the test can then “drill students on actual upcoming test items” (“FairTest Press Release: Standardized Exam Cheating in 37 States And D.C., New Report Shows Widespread Test Score Corruption”). This is morally wrong since teachers who do not have the access to an actual test or those who refuse to view it do not know what would be on the test and cover a broad domain of material, not just specifics.
This chapter's main idea is that the study of economics is the study of incentives. We find a differentiation between economic incentives, social incentives and moral incentives. Incentives are described in a funny way as "means of urging people to do more of a good thing or less of a bad thing", and in this chapter we find some examples public school teachers in Chicago, sumo wrestling in Japan, take care center in Israel and Paul Feldman's bagel business of how incentives drive people and most of the time the conventional wisdom turns to be "wrong" when incentives are in place.
The Atlanta Public School system was involved in what some describe as one of the largest scandals in United States history. The scandal was uncovered by the Atlanta Journal – Constitution after research showed “statistically improbable increases” in test scores. A two-year investigation ensued and reviled test scores dating all the way back to 2005 were tampered with. In 2011 the investigation concluded 44 of the 56 schools examined were found cheating. The educators violated a numerous amount of code sections. Felonies, if found guilty are punishable by nothing less than five years, maximum twenty years. The number of educators with involvement in the scandal was astronomical. One-hundred and seventy eight educators helped orchestrate the plan to raise the CRCT test scores. CRCT stands for Criterion – Referenced Competency Test. This test is given to students from grades one through eight. The purpose of this test is to assess the students in areas such as reading, English, mathematics, social studies and science.
Why do so many people use 123HelpMe.com simply to plagiarize other people's writing? Is it even possible that someone cannot write their own essay, or that someone cannot read a book of any length? If you plagiarize, aren't you sentencing yourself to failure? And if you cannot gather information, aren't you opening yourself to attacks from the System?
The Standardized Testing System, instituted in the public school system, has been used as a guideline in assessing a student’s comprehension of the subjects taught in the classroom and for measuring a teacher’s aptitude of relating the subject material to the students (Fletcher). Florida has instituted a new Bill SB-736 that will now no longer grant teacher’s tenure, and will use the scores from the FCAT to decide whether a teacher will keep their job. While originally created to help the school system, standardized testing has been shown to have many problems, and even to cause harm to students, teachers, and schools. The standardized testing system must be severely revamped, as well as the way the scores affect the schools the students attend.
Too much time is being devoted to preparing students for standardized tests. Parents should worry about what schools are sacrificing in order to focus on raising test scores. Schools across the country are cutting back on, or even eliminating programs in the arts, recess for young children, field trips, electives for high school students, class meetings, discussions about current events, the use of literature in the elementary grades, and entire subject areas such as science (if the tests cover only language arts and math) (Kohn Standardized Testing and Its Victims 1).
In the popular Japanese sport, sumo wrestlers go head to head in order to obtain a coveted spot at the top of the sumo wrestling bracket. “The sixty-six highest-ranked wrestlers in Japan, comprising the makuuchi and jury divisions, make up the sumo elite. A wrestler near the top of this elite pyramid may earn millions and is treated like royalty.” (Dubner, Levitt 38). Due to these intriguing economic incentives, it is clear why cheating is abundantly present throughout the sport. Not only are the wrestlers lured by the economic incentives of wealth, they are also drawn by the social incentives of being in the highest class of wrestlers. These incentives are able to directly influence the various stables of the sumo elite to work together in order to maintain their spots in the sumo elite. In order to maintain a place amongst the elite or to gain a place in the sumo elite, a wrestler must win at least 8 out of 15 total matches in the tournament. So, when wrestlers of cooperating stables go head to head, a wrestler with a qualifying score of 8-6 may allow the opposing wrestler with a score of 7-7 to win the match. Such a situation is a prime example of cheating to lose, which is often the most frowned upon form of cheating. When analyzing the probability of a wrestler with a 8-6
This interest in current affairs first motivated my enthusiasm for Economics. My first insight into this vast and fascinating subject was provided by school in which I studied basic economic theories. After finding that I was suddenly able to understand different ideas regularly brought up by the news and political debates I decided to explore the subject further. I did this through a combination of reading and listening to online lectures on the Kahn Academy website. Reading Freakonomics by Steven Levitt was a turning point for me as it opened up my eyes to the extent to which economic principles can be applied to so many different unlikely things from cheating sumo wrestlers to dealing drugs. I was particularly fascinated by how the author
Academic dishonesty, specifically cheating and plagiarism, recently has increased in popularity. Students often justify unethical academic behavior. Technological innovations, like the cellular telephone, have provided students with new methods of cheating. Plagiarism has also been influenced through technologies, specifically internet companies have emerged that provide unethical solutions to academic assignments.
School systems today are so lenient in their rules, guidelines and consequences; thus causing cheating, copying or forgeries to be frequently used. Many students take advantage of copying someone else's work whenever they are given the chance. Other times, students will simply have someone else do their work and turn it in as their own, not realizing the effects this behavior can create. This creates a lack of creativity, no sense of responsibility and the students will never acquire new knowledge. These practices of cheating, copying and forgery by students are unethical and should be brought to the surface whenever possible.
In August of 2004, a New Mexico high school teacher reported that many students didn’t take their standardized testing seriously because it didn’t affect their grades. Instead, this junior class at New Mexico Valley High School had “fun” with their testing, filling in answers in shapes such as Christmas trees, battleships, and hearts (Contreras). Though many teens understand that standardized testing isn’t completely helpful, school corporations still administer them. Why? Many would say that they assess the teachers and measure the intelligence and performance of students, but it is arguable that they are unnecessary and measure the amount that students care and/or pay attention instead.
Main Point: The glue that connects schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers are the incentives and opportunity cost paired with the utility of money that drives both of them to cheat.