Depicting Poverty: A Comparative Analysis of McCourt and Davis

1247 Words3 Pages

Frank McCourt a non-fiction writer and Rebecca Harding Davis, a realist writer, both wrote about poverty. Although their works are centuries apart, their depictions are similar. Many people know that poverty exists and some may even empathize with those who struggle with poverty, but unless they have lived in poverty, one cannot know how a person or family deals with the daily challenges that living in poverty has. These two writers have written about poverty, McCourt’s personal experience through his memoir Angela’s Ashes, and Harding with her short story “Life in the Iron Mills”. Through their similarities, these two authors use imagery, figurative language, and symbolism to convey the culture of poverty.
The powerful imagery used by McCourt is descriptive leaving little to be misinterpreted. The imagery used encompasses many of our senses an example of this is shown when he writes:
From October to April the walls of Limerick glistened with the damp. Clothes never dried: Tweed and woolen coats housed living things sometimes …show more content…

First by sight in describing “Walls of Limerick” of course, there are no walls, but the scene is now in place. Then he proceeds with touch “with the damp: clothes never dried” McCourt is slowly bringing the reader into his environment, and with these five words “the damp clothes never dried” describing the constant weather of Limerick, so the reader may envision the environment being described. Next, he uses smell “cigarette and pipe smoke laced with stale fumes of spilled stout and whiskey and tinged with the odor of piss wafting in from the outdoor jakes where many a man puked.” The readers image is now complete. Because McCourt includes extensive sensory details to his imagery the reader can see, feel, smell and some may argue taste, inevitably makes not only this scene relatable to the reader, but exemplifies the continued conditions of the characters living in

Open Document