Francis Fukuyama's Theory Of Human Morality

1318 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Principles of ethics in biomedical research

Today science is moving quickly and people like the Dalai Lama are trying to Establish ethics in science before science outpaces ethics all together. Fukuyama has published a few papers about ethics over the years. In one his more recent papers Human Dignity he discusses his ideas about human ethics and what they are based in. While I agree with many of the principal points in Human Dignity there are multiple definite flaws riddled throughout the piece.
Before Fukuyama lays out what his ideas of Human dignity are he discusses his theory called Factor X. Factor X is “The sum of the behavior and characteristics that are typical of the human species a raising from genetic rather than environmental factors.”Francis Fukuyama Our Poast Human Future …show more content…

Social norms are more like the moral laws for different communities of humans. An example of social norms is the handshake. In the U.S. when you meet someone new you are expected to shake their hand as a form of greeting and a gesture of good will. If you do not then people will judge you because they judge people as unfriendly if they do not shake hands. In other countries there are different types of greetings like bowing in china and Japan. Refusing to bow is insulting to the other person and you are directed to do it by social norms. Different social norms are created by people who all believe the same thing and ensure that everyone does it. For example, People will make each other shake hands to ensure that everyone does …show more content…

In Fukuyama’s words, Human dignity is the badge of factor X. This means that if person 1 feels that person 2 has human dignity than Person 2 fits in Person 1’s Factor X. If you once again imagine the redline that separates humans from non-humans the red line is human dignity. Anyone that a person believes does not have human dignity has crossed their red line and is now no longer considered human. It is possible for Person 2 to believe that person 1 has no human dignity even if person 1 believes that person 2 does. This is because the red line that is human dignity changes from one person to

Show More
Related

  • Human Dignity by Francis Fukuyama

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    Francis Fukuyama describes Factor X as, “the one essential human quality underneath that is worthy of a certain minimal level of respect”(Fukuyama 186). Factor X is the center-point of what is known as human dignity. In today's society, there is a regression in the amount of Factor X and a decline in the amount of human dignity shown. In the past, it was common for people to show each other respect as well as respect themselves as it was just common place in society at that time. The treatment of women by both men and other women best shows the drastic f...

    Read More

  • The Category of Factor X

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ts taken away before they even have the chance to used them. They no longer have the choice in how they want to live their lives, political feelings or social interactions because they are either different or do not possess Factor X. These people posses what are as Fukuyama calls them accidental characteristics, that make them unable to be categorize under Factor X.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Human Genetics By Francis Fukuyama

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fukuyama argues that the need for humans full emotional gamut is the most important unique human characteristic and humans will constantly believe they know what are "good" and "bad" emotions. Fukuyama presents the idea of biogenetics being able to take away attributes that are perceived to be "evil", but "in the absence of these human evils there would be no sympathy, compassion, courage, heroism, solidarity, or strength of character."(Fukuyama 202). This becomes an issue because humans have lost respect for those emotions and forget that they are needed for their ethical emotions to be apart of them. Fukuyama coins the term "genetic lottery" which is the wide range of genetic variations that make humans all different, but also makes them all human. Once humans narrow this genetic lottery down, they lose their differences, and now being human will become a narrow definition instead of a unique one. With the rise of new genetics neglecting the idea of human dignity, or what it means to be human, we will see that a hierarchical system ruled by genetically modified people and the oppression that will

    Read More

  • Non Paradigmatic Humans And Animals Case Study

    1225 Words  | 3 Pages

    One characteristic of Human beings is that for one to be considered Human he must be able to achieve the kind of dignity and self-respect that human beings have, he must be able to choose his actions rather than be led by instinct. Hence, the values of appreciating art, literature, and the goods that come with deep personal relationships all require one to be rational, autonomous,

    Read More

  • Olivia Butler Bloodchild Analysis

    1331 Words  | 3 Pages

    The humans are identified as not respecting the intrinsic value of actually being human. “And toward the end of his life, when he should have been slowing down, he had married my mother and fathered four children” (Butler 3). Gan observes his father’s lifespan, but is not phased that he does not adhere

    Read More

  • Breaking Experiment Essay

    2113 Words  | 5 Pages

    While breaking the three social norms there was one feeling that I felt was mutual throughout. Breaking those norms made me felt extremely out of place and rude. They made me feel that way because I knew what I was doing wasn 't socially right and people would get mad or be rude to me with their reactions. For the most part throughout my experiment, most people reacted the way I thought they would. You could tell that most people felt awkward or uncomfortable while I was breaking the norm. I faced a couple of difficulties through my assignment when it came to violating the social norms. While trying to break the movie theater norm, it was difficult for me to pick movies with different variety of people and movies that were a little older so less people would be attending them. I also had a little trouble when it came to answering the phone and waiting for the other person to talk first. The problem with this one was that I had to wait for people to actually call me which doesn 't happen that often in this day and age anymore. To conclude, these social norms forced people to be in uncomfortable situations and make a decision as to how they would react to

    Read More

  • Examples Of Breaking Social Norms

    727 Words  | 2 Pages

    Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors, values, and beliefs of its members. Implicit social norms are introduced to us at a very early age, and exert a powerful influence on our behavior into adulthood. Our culture is ruled by social norms. In many situations, people 's perception of these norms have a big influence on their behavior. Implicit social norms are not openly stated, but found out when disobeyed. Implicit rules are rules we conform to as a society, and generally these rules make living together more comfortable. Social norms are important because they define the nature of a group, clarify relationships among members, and express values. They are also important because they create cohesion within the society, and members of that society are very aware when such norms are violated. Social norms are often strictly enforced and offenders are often disliked for their conduct. Also, some norms are more strictly held to in certain situations than in

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Human Inequality In Pope Francis's Evangelii Gaudium

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    Human persons are fundamentally equal in their worth and dignity. A person’s worth is not dependent on their lineage, how they fit in some utopian scheme, how much they produce or consume, their autonomy or independence, or their race, intelligence, age, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status. Human worth is innate and cannot be forfeited. And it is equal in each person.

    Read More

  • Social Norms in Society

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many things that influence our behavior from internal influences to social norms. Social norms are implicit or explicit rules that govern how we behave in society (Maluso, class notes). Social norms influence our behavior more than any of us realize but we all notice when a norm has been broken. Breaking a social norm is not an easy task and often leads us feeling uncomfortable whether we broke the norm ourselves or witnessed someone else breaking it. Sometimes however, you just have to break a norm to see what happens.

    Read More

  • The Power of Norms

    577 Words  | 2 Pages

    Norms are a part of everyday life. Without norms the world would be in total chaos. Norms by definition are rules of behavior shared by members of a society and rooted in the value system. ( ) Norms are held at a high standard in a society and are valued by its members. Norms vary from society to society. What is considered normal in one society may not be acceptable in another society. Norms are a societies way of living if a member of society breaks that norm they may be looked at as strange or even penalized depending on what kind of norm is broken. Norms are broken into three categories which are folkways, mores, and laws. Folkways are customs or desirable behaviors that are not strictly enforced. Violating a folkway is not criminal, but violating a folkway may have you looked at as weird. Mores are the strongest form of norms they have great moral significance in a society. Violating a more is considered immoral or borderline criminal. The strongest form of mores are taboos which are unthinkable action within a society. Laws are the third category of norms that a...

    Read More

  • A Satisfactory Moral Theory

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Rachels expresses his thoughts on what a satisfactory moral theory would be like. Rachels says a “satisfactory theory would be realistic about where human beings fit in the grand scheme of things” (Rachels, 173). Even though there is an existing theory on how humans came into this world there is not enough evidence to prove the theory to be correct. In addition to his belief of knowing how our existence came into play, he also has a view on the way we treat people and the consequences of our actions. My idea of a satisfactory moral theory would be treating people the way we wish to be treated, thinking of what results from our doings, as well as living according to the best plan.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Transhumanism By Francis Fukuyama

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Humans are a very complex, and intelligent species. Certain aspects such as character, emotions, and morality help to contribute and to build upon these intricacies. Fukuyama uses the appeal of logos to bring reason into the aspect that human nature is a fragile balance, and when unnecessarily toiled with, it can entirely unravel a person’s demeanor. He supports his arguments by giving numerous examples as to how positive and negative aspects of our personalities directly link up, and by trying when trying to correct the negative side, we disrupt the positive side as well and become entirely off

    Read More

  • Human Rights By John Tasioulas

    1991 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Tasioulas introduces the idea that human rights are explained by the morals that humans possess through understanding of human dignity. He explains that are three connections that human dignity has to human rights. The first connection presented is that human dignity and rights are rarely distinguished between due to having virtually the same standards in regards to them. The second that dignity is a starting point in moral grounds that human rights build off of. And last, that the idea that human rights are justified by dignity, saying dignity is the ideal basis for human rights. Tasioulas chooses to focus on the last point, that it is our morals that bring about human rights and that our morals come from humans having dignity. The key thing being that human dignity is something that all possess by simply being human beings there is no merit in achievement or by what legislation or social position can give us.

    Read More

  • Innocence In Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    considered to be essential traits of what constitutes a human being, and gives humans the

    Read More

  • Socially Constituted Knowledge

    1708 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Buddhist ideas, all creature are created equal; the poor and the rich, the disabled and the able-bodied, human beings and animals, are all lives, make no distinctions between the high and the low. As an honorable Buddhist monk, the Dalai Lama knows the true essence among different lives very well, even in the modern word with advanced technology such as genetic engineering. Therefore, “the issue is no longer whether we should or should not acquire knowledge and explore its technological potential. Rather, the issue is how to use this new knowledge and power in the most expedient and ethically responsible manner” (Dalai Lama 134). As getting to know more about biology, people recognize that all lives are made up of flesh, blood, and bones. However, people have no rights to kill other lives by using the newest knowledge because ethical standards guide people to use the social constituted knowledge morally. With the given scientific evidence, more people believe that all lives on the earth have emotions, and they should be treated equally to human beings. Undoubtedly, those experiments on animals have made great contributions to genetic engineering, which have saved many people’s lives. However, by enjoying the achievements, people should reflect on themselves whether they respected those animals’ lives lost in experiments. Furthermore, since people usually say they are now living in an “open” world, what does the word “open” mean? Is “open” means people can do anything they want without worrying about others’ feelings? The answer is “no,” because “‘open’ meant two things: first, anyone, in principle, could contribute. Second, all of the content would be made freely available” (Poe 353). While most information is available on the Internet, if the contributors’ range is widened to all lives, people will find that both animals and humans can make contributions to technological developments. For

    Read More

More about Francis Fukuyama's Theory Of Human Morality

Open Document