Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benchmarking pros and cons
Benchmarking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benchmarking pros and cons
Benchmarking is the process of establishing a standard of excellence and comparing an organization function or activity, a product, or an enterprise as a whole with that standard. Healthcare institutions may use benchmarking to reduce expenses and at the same time improve product and service quality. Benchmarking in the healthcare industry is a quality management issue that is a continuous process by which an organization can measure and compare its own processes with those of organizations that are leaders in a particular area. Benchmarking should be viewed as a part of quality management programs, not as a replacement. There are four kinds of benchmarking: internal, competitive, functional and generic. With internal benchmarking,
Nerenz, D. R. & Neil, N. (2001). Performance measures for health care systems. Commissioned paper for the center for Health management research. [PDF document]. Retrieved from Systemswww.hret.org/chmr/resources/cp19b.pdf
Healthcare organizations must inhere a strategy to stay ahead of their competitors so that they can maintain their patient volume. By measuring the quality of care through performance, patient satisfaction, and experience, and cost all play a role of having patients to choose your hospital. Today, many healthcare organizations have adopted the triple aim strategy of great quality, great patient experience for a reasonable cost. With the tracking of their patient experience and continuously improving the quality of care at a reasonable cost to stay one step ahead of their competitors and to maintain and increase patient volume has been successful help in the healthcare
The standards of the Joint Commission are a foundation for an objective evaluation process the may help healthcare organizations measure, assess and improve performance. These standards are focused on organizational functions that are key for providing safe high quality care services. The Joint Commission’s standards set goal expectations of reasonable, achievable and surveyable performance of an organization. Only new standards that are relative to patient safety or care quality, have positive impact on healthcare outcomes, and can be accurately measured are added. Input from healthcare professionals, providers, experts, consumers and government agencies develop these standards.
With healthcare costs soaring in the United States, there is a continuous movement by hospitals and health systems towards reaching a number of patient and system oriented goals related to higher levels of quality, safety, and cost effectiveness. The Triple Aim captures the essential challenges and opportunities of this time within the U.S. Healthcare system. Formally introduce by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) in October 2007, the Triple Aim is theoretical model for optimizing health system performance. The initiative has three components: improving the patient experience of care (including quality and satisfaction), improving the health of populations, and reducing the per capita costs of health care (Berwick,
Benchmarking should not be considered simply a tool of management, but rather an integral part of the business strategy of a firm. When implementing benchmarking, management must consider the overall issues of performance and process re-engineering.
The Texas Health Harris Methodist-Cleburne hospital is looking to achieve high performance in surgical measure using the following lessons: Plan- Hospitals within a health system can turn to each other as partners in quality improvement efforts and resources to help solve shared problems. Organize- Concurrent review identifies noncompliant cases and help address issues prior to patient discharge. Report- Report cards can be used to provide individual feedback. Quality improvement staff should be willing to provide one-on-one coaching to physicians in need of improvement. Coordinate- Share evidence- based literature with physicians can encourage them to accept recommended care practices. Physicians are receptive to information from peers, as opposed to changes that could be interpreted as ‘another hospital rule’. Direct- Preprinted order sets help standardize practices and improve core measures performances, even prior to implementation of an electronic health record system. Staff- Familiarizing new staff and physicians with the core measures and their relationship to improve patient care provides a foundation for
The overall goal of performance management is to ensure that an organization and its subsystems (processes, departments, teams, etc.), are optimally working together to achieve the results desired by the organization. Performance management has a wide variety of applications including measuring the leader performance, such as, staff performance, business performance, or in health care, health outcome performance measures. To manage and measure performance of leaders are directed to the organizational strategic goals and mission. The primary reason to measure and manage performance of leaders is to drive quality improvement. The Clinical performance of a leader are derived from evidence-based clinical guidelines and measurement allows an evaluation of an important outcome of care for patients, and it is a proxy to understand the effectiveness of the underlying systems of care. Just as there are evidence-based care guidelines for many conditions, there also are established measures that indicate how leaders has effectively guidelines and has translated to
Quality and quality improvement are important to any healthcare organization because these principles allows organizations to fulfill their missions more effectively. Defining what quality is may differ depending on whom is asking the question, as differing participates may have differing ideas about what quality means and why it is important. Being that quality is what unites patients and healthcare organizations, we can see the importance of quality and the need for strong policies and practices that improve patient care and their experience while receiving that care. Giannini (2015) states that this dualistic approach to quality utilizes separate measurements, conformance quality that measures patient outcomes against a set standard and
There are many different ways to creating an optimal work environment especially in the healthcare industry. For example, the relationships between evidence-based practice and benchmarking have similar points in creating an optimal work environment. Evidence-based practice is defined as "a problem-solving approach to practice that involves the conscientious use of current best evidence in making decisions about patient care” (Melnyk & Fineout, 2005). “Benchmarking is usually considered to be a process of seeking out and implementing best practices at best cost.” (Tardy, Levif & Michel, 2012). The two concept have a similar goal in creating the best care and practices in the medical field that is beneficial to the clinic, their employees, and
In the health care industry, gathering information in order to find the best diagnosis route or even determine patient satisfaction is necessary. This is complete by conducting a survey and collecting data. When the information is complete, we then have statistical information used to make administrative decision within the healthcare field. The collection of meaningful statistics is an important function of any hospital or clinic.
At its most fundamental core, quality improvement of healthcare services and resources requires disciplined attention to the measurement, monitoring, and reporting of system performance (Drake, Harris, Watson, & Pohlner, 2011; Jones, 2010; Kennedy, Caselli, & Berry, 2011). Research points to performance measurement as a significant factor in enabling strategic planning processes and achievement of performance goals (Tapinos, Dyson & Meadows, 2005). Thus, without a system of measurement that accounts for the performance behaviors of healthcare professionals, managers and administrative employees, quality improvement remains a visionary abstraction (de Waal, 2004).
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
Chip Conley ideas can fit into the behavior measurement aspect of a performance management system because he speaks about culture; which applies to the culture of the organization as well as individual perspectives (Conley, 2010). This applies to the behavior aspects of the performance measurement because the behaviors, the make-up and the values that the organization have in place can help them achieve their goal (Aguinis, 2013). In order for an organization to be successful they have to not only provide a safe working environment they also need to know what they want to achieve and how to achieve them. This includes having the right managers in place that is committed to the success of their employees which leads to the success of themselves
Introduction Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a form of economic analysis that compares the relative costs and outcomes/effects of two or more scenarios. The CEA is typically expressed as a ratio, where the denominator is a gain in health using a natural unit of measurement (years of life, cases of flu prevented, etc.). and the numerator is the cost associated with that health gain. Most clinical studies express gains in health in terms of disease-specific measures, such as number of heart attacks avoided or cases of influenza prevented. Although this is useful for particular treatments related to those health conditions, those measures do not allow for comparison across diseases.
There are many reasons for employee training and development in the health care environments. Another reason for employee training is to keep with the development with the new change in the world today. Another reason is to benchmark the status of improvement so far in a performance i...