Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics and purpose of formative assessment
Characteristics and purpose of formative assessment
Characteristics and purpose of formative assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics and purpose of formative assessment
Formative assessment is becoming a trend in the education system while the effect of this form of formative assessment on students’ learning is still under evaluation. This study aims to provide a greater insight into how effective engaging formative assessment helps motivate students to learn and boost their academic performance based on students’ past experience. Two different data collection methods are carried out in a local primary school. In a cohort of 120 students from primary one to six, questionnaires are distributed while interviews of six teachers teaching primary one to six and the school principal are carried out concurrently to explore their experience of formative assessment. It is expected to find out that formative assessment …show more content…
Formative assessment is becoming a new force in the whole education system, particularly in the primary classroom as a way to improve teaching and learning (Hall & Burke, 2004). However, it is still not clear that whether formative assessment brings a positive outcome to student learning. One may note that students’ experience of assessment practice is a vital source of information on the nature of the relationship between formative assessment and learning (Weurlander et al, 2012). In order to better understand the relationship between students’ academic performance and the practice of formative assessment in classrooms so that more suitable education policy could be formulated with clearer insights, we would do a research in a local primary school to see the effect of formative assessment on learning by exploring students and teachers’ experience in the implementation of formative assessment. The specific research questions are as …show more content…
Principal’s attitude on the effectiveness of formative assessment is vital for the successful implementation of an effective assessment method as he is the final decision maker of the assessment policy adopted in the whole school. While for the teachers, they are the ones who implement the assessment, therefore, their experience and perception as well as effective strategies in their mind are necessary to be understood. The interview will be under a rather exploratory approach that most of the questions are open-ended such as “what do you think about the formative assessment policy in the school?” which give more space for interviewees to voice their point of view and enable the collection of a more comprehensive set of data. All the interviews done with the teachers and principal will be audio-tapped so that it can be replayed repeatedly for data extracting and data analysis later. The effect of the assessment strategies suggested in the interviews will be observed in the observation stage later to see if they are really effective in involving students and help students
Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 215-232, doi:10.1080/09695940600708653
Current educational policy and practice asserts that increased standardized student testing is the key to improving student learning and is the most appropriate means for holding individual schools and teachers accountable for student learning. Instead, it has become a tool solely for summarizing what students have learned and for ranking students and schools. The problem is standardized tests cannot provide the information about student achievement that teachers and students need day-to-day. Classroom assessment can provide this kind of information.
The tools and techniques used are comprehensive, which helps assess a learner’s development in the area of learning, like the ability to understand, analyze, and apply knowledge acquired through creative process that are evaluated. The evaluation section was divided into two broad categories: Scholastic that looked at the areas which were subject specific and Co-Scholastic that included activities that were co-curricular like life skills, attitudes and values. The Scholastic evaluations were divided into Summative assessment to help analyse how much the students have learned after teaching through various medium like multiple choice questions, long and short answers, match the following, fill in the blanks and understanding diagrams in science and Formative assessment were to evaluate the students everyday learning situations during teaching to help identify gaps which help provide feedback to teachers to be able take remedial action through the use of various tools like observation, document analysis,peer reviews,self-assessment,tests and implementation of various techniques like projects,assignments posters,charts,collages,group discussions and seminars.
This article, initiated by the Assessment Group of the British Educational Research Association, focuses on how improving formative assessment raises standards and how there is still room for improvement. It discusses the importance of self and peer assessments and effective teaching. They also identified four ways to implement classroom policies to improve formative assessment.
Assessments have always been a tool for teachers to assess mastery and for a long time it was just to provide a grade and enter it into the grade book or report card. Through resources in and out of the course, there has been a breath of new life into the research on how to use assessments. They take many forms and fall within the summative or formative assessment category. Sloan (2016) addresses how formative assessments has traditionally been used by teachers to modify instruction, but when we focus on a classroom that is learner-centered “it becomes assessment for learning as opposed to assessment of learning” (slide 4). The fact is, the students are the ones that should be and are the ones using the data we collect through assessments, since it is our way of providing feedback in order
Regular use of formative assessment improves student learning as instruction can be adjusted based on students’ progress and teachers are able to modify instructions to cater to students’ individual needs (Black & Wiliam, 2010; Taylor-Cox, & Oberdorf, 2013). Various forms of informal and formal formative assessment methods are conducted as learning takes place, continuously through teacher observations, questioning through individual interactions, group discussions and open-ended tasks (McMillan, 2011). tests can tell us a lot about students and be used to inform and guide teaching, rather than simply to determine grades. Teachers can learn a lot from test results if they analyse the data generated to inform their teaching and learning programs (Perso, 2009). However, high stakes tests may result in students becoming stressed, leading to misreading questions, careless working and incomplete answers (Booker et al., 2010).
However, a formative assessment is ongoing and is used to check for students’ understanding throughout a lesson. Both work samples “matched learning objectives” and I was able to identify the students’ strength and weaknesses. I was also able to “analyze assessment data to understand patterns and gaps in learning” to guide my future instructions. In the word problem assessment, I recognized where the student was struggling and gave “effective and descriptive feedback” to address the area that she needs work in.
For more than 20 years, formative assessment has been highly researched and even accredited as a critical part of a teacher’s pedagogy. In the last decade it (formative assessment has become something of a buzzword and in some cases a mandate in k-12 schools across the country. Formative assessment can be defined as a part of the instructional process intended to gather information and provide feedback for both students and teachers that allow for needed
In addition, assessment tests are offered to students by various options such as oral, real-life problems to be solved, portfolios and standard tests. Finally, there is a constant dialogue between the student and teacher to assess performance. Any student not meeting the standards is then provided the additional necessary
Although somewhat vague compared to summative assessment, several key features help frame formative assessment. First, formative assessment happens while learning is taking place as opposed to at the end of content delivery. Rather, this is considered “assessment for learning,” (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012, pg. 5). The format is formal or informal, but the outcome in its use is an in-progress check of what students know and what students do not know. Chappuis, Stiggins, Chappuis, and Arter (2012) define formative assessment as, “Formal and informal processes teachers and students use to gather evidence for the purpose of improving learning,” (pg. 24). Second, this type of assessment is used to make instructional strategy adjustments. If student learning did not happen via one instructional method, the teacher must make the necessary accommodations to reteach the concept or skill. Next, it is not only used by teachers for feedback on instruction, but formative assessment is also used for providing timely, descriptive feedback to students and extends to allow for student self-assessment (Chappuis, J., Stiggins, Chappuis, S., & Arter, 2012; Popham, 2008). Formative assessment provides opportunity to provide specific feedback to students on where they are currently in their learning, and where they should be headed.
A formative assessment is an assessment that truly informs instruction. It can be formal or informal, provides feedback, low level vs. high level and allows for instructional changes to be made (McMillan, J. H., 2014). The definition of a formative assessment in the article of “Attributes of Effective Formative Assessment” “is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended instructional outcomes” (CCSSO, 2008). In this weeks recommended readings I found that formative assessments and monitoring progress go hand-in-hand. Educators and administrators can monitor and assess students learning and progress daily using ongoing
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
In spite of the importance of assessment in education, few teachers receive proper training on how to design or analyze assessments. Due to this, when teachers are not provided with suitable assessments from their textbooks or instructional resources, teachers construct their own in an unsystematic manner. They create questions and essay prompts comparable to the ones that their teachers used, and they treat them as evaluations to administer when instructional activities are completed predominantly for allocating students' grades. In order to use assessments to improve instruction and student learning, teachers need to change their approach to assessments by making sure that they create sound assessments. To ensure that their assessments are sound they need include five basic indicators that can be used as steps to follow when creating assessments. The first of these indicators and the first step a teacher must take when creating a sound assessme...
For my homophones lesson in Mrs. Anderson’s class, I feel that I did a great job teaching the lesson and providing plenty of practice opportunities. I believe that the formative and summative assessments that I used throughout my lesson provided the information Mrs. Anderson and I hoped to get out of this small unit.
Cauley, K.H. & McMillan, J.H. (2009). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. Clearing House, 83(1), 1-6.