Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis On Differentiated Instruction
How Differentiated Instruction Can Work and Fail in the Article Mapping a Route Toward Differentiated Instruction by Carol Ann Tomlinson
How Differentiated Instruction Can Work and Fail in the Article Mapping a Route Toward Differentiated Instruction by Carol Ann Tomlinson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thesis On Differentiated Instruction
Introduction
With global diversity the modern day classroom sees so many changes as opposed to those even from a couple of decades ago. The inclusion of students from diverse cultural backgrounds, students where English as a second language (ESL) and students with disabilities are compelling educators to take a look at current teaching practices. As a result, the common practices of the past are not necessarily relevant today and require a change. This paper will attempt to introduce some of the characteristics and benefits of differentiated instruction.
Differentiated Instruction Defined
Tomlinson (2005), a leading expert in this field, defines differentiated instruction as a philosophyof teaching that is based on the principle that students
…show more content…
That is not to say that the required state or district standard curriculum is not met, but rather include creative approaches to teaching and learning of thosestandards.Some characteristics as defined by the California Department of Education (2001) are that teachers spend quality time with their students learning about their level of self-esteem and academic readiness. Furthermore, the classrooms become student centered through differentiated instruction where no student is singled out for their learning aptitude. Teachers design in class instruction and homework assignments with the student learning style, aptitude, and needs in mind while still ensuring that the learning outcomes set forth by the standard curriculum of the district are met. In addition, assessment tests are offered to students by various options such as oral, real-life problems to be solved, portfolios and standard tests. Finally, there is a constant dialogue between the student and teacher to assess performance. Any student not meeting the standards is then provided the additional necessary …show more content…
Standard curriculum is what is to be taught but differentiation is how it is taught and how various avenues can be presented for a variety of teaching and learning. Furthermore, Tomlinson goes on to suggest that any standard can be selected and by differentiating the materials provided to students, they can be challenged to meet the needs of the standards at varied levels of difficulty. Teachers can create lessons to appeal to multiple student interests to promote interest in the
An educator must have the ability to notice the value of extending planning and subject matter. In addition, educators need to be flexible enough to change the curriculum based upon state standards and the student’s ability to absorb information.
Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved March 22, 2012, from www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/udl/diffinstruction.asp
1. Differentiated instruction- Is personalized and customized learning, and it is one of the concepts in education that many people hear about, but do not understand clearly.
Effective teachers in a differentiated classroom have always considered their students’ uniqueness (i.e, academic needs, talents, interests, learning styles) in planning, teaching, and evaluating lessons. Tomlinson (1999) describes other features of this approach, among them the engagement of students through different learning modalities; each student’s competition with self; flexibility in various aspects of the school day; teacher as diagnostician; multiple ...
Cloran (n.d.) suggest teachers need to have a broad understanding of giftedness and learning disabilities, a variety of identification measures and the ability to modify the curriculum and implement differentiated teaching strategies to meet the unique needs of all students. A graduate teacher recognises that students learn in their own way and should understand and be able to identify a number of teaching strategies to differentiate and meet the learning needs of all students. They may create groups based on previous assessment results and set clear or modified instructions for each group based on ability or learning styles. To address the specific learning needs of all student abilities, multi-sensory strategies using charts, diagrams, outside lessons and videos, as well as posters around the room or information on the desk could be used. Tomlinson (1999) suggests that differentiated instruction aims to build on student’s strengths and maximize their learning by adjusting instructional tasks to suit their individual needs. Ensuring teaching and instructions are clear, revising and prompting students during lessons and providing templates and assisting student in breaking down tasks into achievable, systematic chunks are some additional examples. Lucas, (2008) suggests highlighting key vocabulary within the text to focus students on the central concepts within the text. Quick finishing students should be provided with the opportunity to extend themselves with extension tasks that have a specific purpose and
In conclusion students learn in different ways and have individual needs therefore students need to be supported in various ways. Differentiated instruction focuses on the strategies, resources, materials and procedures that educators need to craft circumstances that can lead to success of every learner. Whereas personalised learning involves matching learning to the individual child. Both differentiation and personalised learning styles aim to create positive learning outcomes for all students.
Each school year children enter classrooms with different abilities, learning styles, and personalities. Educators are required to see that all students meet the standards of their district using Common Core Standards. Through the use of differentiated instruction strategies, many educators can meet the needs of all students and help them to meet and exceed the established standards. In this case study, this author gives practical examples of how to differentiate content, process, and product for Destiny Shamrock, a new ELL student assigned to my caseload.
Differentiated Assessment is a process where teachers combine data and valuable information together before, during and after instruction takes place to create a strategic learning plan. “One of the major principles of differentiated instruction is that of making instructional choices in response to differences in student learning. It therefore stands to reason that teachers must be aware of what students are learning and how they are applying it in order to vary that in instruction. Even though teachers evaluate student learning with great regularity, most of these activities are conducted in order to produce grades, to place or sort students, or to document students’ progress on high-stakes exams, while these assessments have their place,
Similarly, the readings also provide relevant insights about the associated roles and responsibilities that educators have to fulfill in order to create a differentiated classroom. Specifically, it may involve addressing key issues such as communication, assessment, instruction, standards, and other related principles that influence the acquisition of information and learning (Tomlinson, 1999). These elements act altogether to create a classroom that is conducive to change and recognizes the value and potential of differentiated classroom to the needs of students today.
How do teachers enable all students of varying abilities to reach the same goals and standards established for their grade level? Instruction begins with a concept of treating each student as a unique learner whose strengths and weaknesses ha...
Currently I am co teaching a fifth grade class of eleven students. The class is a general education class with four students who have disabilities. My main focus for the class is teaching the human body system and implementing writing into the class. Differentiation of instruction is something we need to show that we are implanting in our classroom. There are four levels of differentiation of instruction; content, process, product, and affect. What we teach, how we teach it; how students demonstrate what they have learned, and how students feel about what they are learning is what DI is about. Educators need to start by choosing the best content that will help all of their students. The content not only has to relate to the subject matter, but need to connect to their culture. The process is also a crucial component of DI and Santamaria feels that the best thing to do for the students is having them work in groups, but Utley took an individual approach to DI. Santamaria feels that cooperative learning stimulates learning. The last component to DI is the product. This could be as simple as allowing the students to present their final product
When teachers differentiate their lesson, the students are more engaged to learn. Students have some choice in their learning activities, which motivates students to want to learn and also puts more learning responsibility on the students. Some students may prefer to work alone or in groups and some students like to be hands-on. By differentiating the lesson, all students’ needs are being met. “Differentiated Instruction gives students a range of ways to access curriculum, instruction and assessment. DI engages students to interact and participate in the classroom in a richer way. It is based on the assumption that all students differ in their learning styles, strengths, needs and abilities and that classroom activities should be adapted to meet these differences
This standard requires a teacher to really understand his/her students especially through the ways they grow and develop. It is important for them to understand that every student is different and therefore, will learn in their own ways. The teacher then learns to meet the needs of all students specifically by creating learning experiences for all to comprehend. Differentiated instruction would be helpful in a classroom in order for the teacher to meet the needs of students who have differences when it comes to interests, readiness and learning needs.
As individuals, do we learn using one method? Does one method fit all? According to Carol Ann Tomlinson, differentiated curriculum is a way of, “shaking up what goes on in the classroom so that students have multiple options for taking in information, making sense of ideas, and expressing what they learn” (Tomlinson, 2001, p. 1).
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a