Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle's idea of form and matter
Aristotle's philosophy of nature
Aristotle's philosophy of nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle's idea of form and matter
Aristotle defined nature “as an internal origin of change or stability”1. Natural substances are things such as animals, plants and inanimate matter like earth, water, fire and air. Each natural substance according to Aristotle has its own nature, which is what gives rise to its natural behaviour/characteristic. The nature of a natural substance is its inner principle/source of change.2
Therefore natural substances are capable of motion i.e. growing, gaining qualities, losing them and lastly being born and dying. In Book II of Physics and Parts of Animals Book 1, Aristotle goes on to contrast natural substances with artefacts, he states these are also capable of motion, but they move according to what they are made out of, he gives us an example of a wooden bed “if the bed sprouted, not a bed but wood would come up”3. Here Aristotle is contrasting two parts of nature – matter and form. An investigation of the principle of matter leads him to draw his important distinction between form and matter and in this essay I will explain and critically discuss why Aristotle holds that “we ought to speak of a things form and the sort of character it has as well, since the nature corresponding to the form is more important than the material nature”4.
In Parts of Animals bk1, Aristotle begins his discussion in how we should investigate animals. He states that there are too many attributes that are common to species and we should narrow this down and discuss those that are distinguished by a difference in form, he gives us an example of locomotion “it is apparent that locomotion is not one in form because flying, swimming, walking and crawling differ”5. He also states that form is not simply as early philosophe...
... middle of paper ...
...scientist should begin by grasping the event and only then to proceed to try to uncover their causes.
Works Cited
Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Bodnar, Istvan, "Aristotle's Natural Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
Broadie, Sarah, PY2003 Lecture, Week 5 and 6 , Lecture Handout (St Andrews 2011).
Fine, Gail & Irwin, Terence (Translation), Aristotle Introductory Readings, (Hackett Publishing Company 1996).
Lennox, James, (Trans), Aristotle, On the Parts of Animals I -IV, (Oxford University Press 2001).
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/
In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of Aristotle’s argument from Physics Book 2, chapter 8, 199a9. Aristotle in this chapter tries to make an analogy between nature and action to establish that both, nature and action, have an end.
Baird, Forrest E., and Walter Kaufman. "Aristotle." Ancient Philosophy. 3rd ed. Philosophic Classics, vols. 1. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2000. 304 - 444.
Kraut, R., (2014). Aristotle’s Ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Available online at URL .
(Physics, Book II, Chapter 7, 198a 30-32). We see in this specification that there are things incapable of moving, which by definition is Aristotle?s Prime Mover. We see that the second classification that is given within the text is things in motion, but indestructible, according to Aristotle this would indicate the universe what moves to be more perfect though we know that in its movement it is not as perfect as the prime mover. The final classification is what Aristotle places nature in. Thus the destructible things are the very things that nature is in charge of and this goes from man and plant to the prime elements. As I stated earlier the idea of wood, stone, and earth to build a house is nothing more than taking nature reshaping into a desirable thing for us, but as it is part of nature, we must accept that even in a changed state by our hands nature?s rules still apply and there will be nothing we can do to stop the movement towards privation of the materials
Aristotle believes that there are four kinds of changes: What, Place, Quality and Quantity. For example, a pen is by definition the object, it has a position and takes up space, it exists for a period of time and has shape and size. These external characteristics can and will change. According to Aristotle, everything changes. Therefore the pen has potential to move, to change color and size. When it changes from a state of how it is perceived, otherwise known as potential, to a state of what it can be, it has reached a state of actuality.
tied down so that they may not move or look backwards. All they see is
There cannot have been a first change, because something would have to have happened just before that change which set it off, and this itself would have been a change, and so on and so forth. Aristotle believed that if the universe ever completely ceased movement there would never be a force that possessed the ability to begin the moving again without the presence of the Prime Mover. In chapter 6 of Metaphysics Lambda, Aristotle concluded that the world and time are not perishable. He vouched for the idea that there must be at least one eternal and imperishable substance; otherwise all substances, therefore everything in the world, would be perishable. Aristotle calls this source of all movement the Prime Mover. The Prime Mover to Aristotle is the first of all substances, the necessary first source of movement, which is itself unmoved. It is a being with everlasting life, and in Metaphysics Aristotle also calls this being
The Theory of Forms or also known as The Theory of Ideas, is a challenging concept but represents the purest form of knowledge according to Socrates and Plato. The Forms represent Plato’s argument that non-physical forms/ideas are the most accurate reality we have. One can notice this difference because throughout Plato’s work, The Theory of Forms are often capitalized. Plato, who speaks of The Forms through different characters in each story, but mostly Socrates, believes that the Forms are the only objects of study that can provide knowledge and are the solutions to the universal problems that occur. Plato was heavily influenced on sceptism, which came from his teacher, Socrates. According to Plato, the world is contantly changing and believes
...of the body, and no problem arises of how soul and body can be united into a substantial whole: ‘there is no need to investigate whether the soul and the body are one, any more than the wax and the shape, or in general the matter of each thing and that of which it is the matter; for while “one” and “being” are said in many ways, the primary [sense] is actuality’ (De anima 2.1, 12B6–9).Many twentieth-century philosophers have been looking for just such a via media between materialism and dualism, at least for the case of the human mind; and much scholarly attention has gone into asking whether Aristotle’s view can be aligned with one of the modern alternatives, or whether it offers something preferable to any of the modern alternatives, or whether it is so bound up with a falsified Aristotelian science that it must regretfully be dismissed as no longer a live option.
"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Aristotle []. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, n.d. Web. 9 Mar. 2014. .
He believes that change can occur because matter can be arranged in many ways that can be different from one another. When the play dough was destroyed to make something else, the play dough still remained. So, we can infer that it is the form that changes while the matter remains unchanging. Changes also occur when the arrangements of a matter change from one to another. So for Aristotle, change is when matter takes a new form.
Early on in the Physics, Aristotle uses language to explain chance and spontaneity and the roles they play in nature. He feels that since chance and spontaneity are posterior to mind and nature, they will never be as important as actual causes as they are as hints that nature has purpose. Aristotle only entertains Empedocles’ proto-Darwinian theory because his philosophical method is based on systematically analyzing the views of other philosophers. He eventually rejects Empedocles’ view because it relies on chance as the driving force, and Aristotle believes that nothing based on chance can thrive in a world that has purpose. He replaces the theories of philosophers like Empedocles and other Pre-Socratic materialists with the idea that nature, like art, has purpose. Aristotle sets out with the question of what force was driving nature and answered with the idea of purposiveness. Darwin’s theory of natural selection and evolution both partially undermined his answer, but neither of them have really answered his question. He may have been immoderately concerned with finding purposiveness in nature and he may have used a faulty tool to do so, but Aristotle’s fundamental question has yet to be answered. Until we can fully answer his question, we can not completely dismiss Aristotle’s arguments.
Moore E., J. Aristotle’s contribution to science, education and physics. JCMoore E.Online. 2010. Web. 25 May, 2014.
According to Aristotle, all natural things on this earth both animate and inanimate have a built in purpose. Added to that concept, he felt that nature as grand whole itself had a purpose or greater design as well. However, Aristotle that these category of things remained fixed and hence did not believe in evolution, he did speak of a grand hierarchy amongst all things on this planet. The scala naturae refers to the fact that nature is arranged in a hierarchy ranging from neutral matter to the unmoved mover, which is pure actuality and is the cause of everything in nature. Aristotle felt that the unmoved mover is what gives all objects their true purpose in life. In his works, the closer to the unmoved mover something is the purer and perfect
Physics has through time inspired the minds of science into different ideas and theories, Beginning with the work of Aristotle, the Greek Philosopher, his theories and assumptions about force and motion are widely studied and understood through time. Born in 384 - 322 B.C.E. Aristotle joined Plato 's Academy at age of 18 and left at age of 36. He was the one of the first great scientists that contributed to the theories of force and motion. He first defined motion as the actuality of a potentiality, and also wrote about a series of studies that he made through his life, such as physics, biology, zoology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theater, music, rhetoric, linguistics, politics and government. But mainly focusing in the