Plato’s Theory of Forms

1721 Words4 Pages

Plato’s Theory of Forms

Plato was born, the son of Ariston and Perictione, in about 428 BC.

His family, on both sides, was among the most distinguished in Athens.

He was born in Athens into a very wealthy family and as a young man

was a student of Socrates.

Plato is probably one of the best-known philosophers.

Plato embarked on a period of extensive travel, returning to Athens

some years later. In 387 BCE he established the Academy, a school

devoted to philosophical debate and learning. Aristotle was a student

at the Academy for about the last twenty years of Plato’s life.

At the heart of all Plato’s philosophy is his Theory of Forms,

sometimes called the Theory of Ideas. Plato believed that there exists

an immaterial Universe of `forms', perfect aspects of everyday things

such as a table, bird, and ideas/emotions, joy, action, etc. The

objects and ideas in our material world are `shadows' of the forms

In the Theory of eternal forms Plato makes a distinction between

objects that are real and concepts that exist in our minds. He

believed that, as well as the material world in which we live and

which we experience, there is also another, eternal world of concepts

or forms. This eternal world is more the real than the world we

experience through the senses, and is the object of knowledge, not

opinion.

In the Allegory of the Cave, Plato portrays education as the process

of leaving the cave into the sunlight. In the back of the cave, facing

the back wall, are the masses—the population of the city. They are

tied down so that they may not move or look backwards. All they see is

the back wall of the cave. Behind them is...

... middle of paper ...

...ue that we must dismiss the objects of our senses as

completely false because they act as a basis on the long journey

towards knowledge. This therefore means Forms would not be completely

separate from the particulars.

On the whole I believe that Plato’s theory is a speculation not to

dismiss and there are points, which are very valid and questions our

reality and existence. But there criticisms which affect the way we

see things; ‘what is goodness’, this is a changing answer and I

believe cannot be answered. Plato does not really present the Forms as

a theory; what is the nature of forms? He talks about forms as

distinct and separate things that are unchangeable, perfect, eternal

and invisible, but what dies it revel about nature? He insists that

forms exist independently of the mind but they are invisible to sense.

More about Plato’s Theory of Forms

Open Document