Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Platos theory of human nature
Essays about justice
Essays about justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Platos' Theory of Human Nature
In my opinion, Socrates’ analysis of human nature is very true as it ultimately brings us
his definition of justice. I agree with his theory of human nature but not his
social-political theory. In order to understand Plato’s theory of human nature and his
social-political theory, we must examine each one of them closely. Plato believed that no
one is self-sufficient enough to live individually. Human beings are not created equally;
some of us are born wiser then the rest and some of us are just born stronger. For this
reason, only the select few (which would be the guardians) among us are supposed to
know what is best for the society and therefore becomes the ruler of everyone else. Our
reasoning, spirit, and natural wants are all part of human nature. In book 1 of The
Republic, Plato had several detailed discussions on the nature of justice with other
speakers in a dialogue form. The process of discussion involves Socrates’ questioning,
arguing against various inadequate theories that attempts to define the true meaning of
justice. From the rich old man Cephalus, we learned that justice involves telling the truth
and repaying one’s debts. However, Socrates points out that this definition of justice is
inadequate because it cannot account for the instances of certain circumstances. The
simple example of returning a borrowed weapon to an insane friend who demands the
return of his weapon, would be an instance of following the rule but would not seem to
be just. Then Polemarchus, Cephalus’s son attempts to define justice by proposing that
justice means “ one should pay what is owed”. Not returning or refusing to return the
borrowed weapon would clearly benefit one’...
... middle of paper ...
... Plato believed that the entire city as a whole will
operate smoothly, exhibiting the harmony that is justice. Then, a human being is only
properly said to be just when the three souls perform their proper functions in harmony
with each other, working in agreement for the good of the person as a whole. In
conclusion, it was found that the education of the guardians was necessary to keep the
city running and with their education you must devote their lives to persue the common
goals and good of the city. Once the individual and the other individuals in the society or
city were working in complete harmony only then would the circle be complete and
everything would run smoothly. However, in order to achieve this the guardian had to be
trained right and raised accordingly. The people must cooperate. Everyone would reap
the benefits from a perfect society.
Beginning with duty to the community, this is something that is clearly evident within their society. From a broad perspective, this is an idea that lays the foundation for how they built
In addition, the Progressives were absolutely correct to improve society by education because by having an education, it will prepare an individual to earn a living, but also to prepare the student to play a useful role in a democratic society. With e...
By definition justice means the quality of being just or fair. The issue then stands, is justice fair for everyone? Justice is the administration of law, the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or punishments, "justice deferred is justice denied.” The terms of Justice is brought up in Henry David Thoreau’s writing, “Civil Disobedience.”
...r children in society and gave them best possible education and safety as well to benefit their needs.
must make an effort to get as close as we can. Many disputes which occur today are because of petty differences between
Also, that justice is a certain type of specialization, meaning that performing a particular task that is a person’s own, not of someone else’s. Plato (2007), Polemarchus argues with Socrates in book I that, “Justice was to do good to a friend and harm to an enemy” (335b p.13). Plato (2007) he then responds, “It is not the function of the just man to harm either his friends or anyone else, but of his opposite the unjust man” (335d p.14). His views of justice are related to contemporary culture, because when someone does something that they are supposed to do, they receive credit or a reward for it, but if the opposite of that is performed, by not doing the particular task that is asked, they are then rewarded but with punishments. Also, that justice is doing the right thing in a society. Justice of contemporary culture does not diverge from the views offered in The Republic and Socrates views are adequate, because if a task is not performed the way it needs to be, and is supposed to be a person should not be rewarded for it. Additionally, that an individual should be just not
There are three types of Justice discussed in Book 1 of Plato’s Republic which are Retributive, Procedural, and Social Justice. Retributive justice is the type of justice that requires someone to pay back their debts if they took something. According to Cephalus, justice requires ‘repayment’ from those who have taken something. For example, The death penalty can be considered retributive justice because someone may have took a life and now their life will be taken from them in return. Procedural justice is doing good for someone that you are close with but doing harm to someone you do not get along with. Polemarchus believes that justice is doing good to good people and doing bad to bad people. For example, Giving your friend a ride to
In Plato’s Republic Book IV, Socrates sets out to convince Glaucon that a person acts with three different parts of the soul, rather than with the soul as a whole. He does this by presenting Glaucon with a variety of situations in which parts of the soul may conflict with one another, and therefore not acting together. Socrates describes the three parts of the soul as the rational part, or that which makes decisions, the appetitive part, or that which desires, and the spirited part, or that which gets angry (436a).
Cephalus is the first to give his opinion of justice as simply "speaking the truth and giving back what one takes." In even simpler terms, it is to do the right thing. (Republic 331) Socrates argues that to give a borrowed weapon back to a friend that has become insane is not justice but injustice. Cephalus concedes that his definition of justice is flawed and leaves.
The idea of being just is one that is often misconstrued. What exactly is justice? What does it take for a person to be truly just? Can someone be truly just, or are we only just for the sake of making other people jealous or proud of us? Plato researched this idea of “being just” in great detail. For a soul to be so, he explained, it must be pious, honest etc. For example, picture the idea of two men- Mr. A and Mr. B. Mr. A will always do the just thing, and Mr. B will always do the unjust thing- he is very manipulative and knows how to deceive. Mr. B however, is more widely liked because he does not let people know he is doing the unjust thing, he is just that good at being manipulative. An example of this is the story of the Ring of Gadges-
1. A further commitment by every person of good will to greater protection of society;
Modern sciences have either directly emerged from philosophy or are very closely related to multiple philosophical questions. Understanding philosophy, as well as the way problems are addressed by philosophers, is the key to understanding science as we know it today and in the future. There are as many definitions of philosophy as there are philosophers – perhaps there are even more. Philosophy is said to be the mother of all disciplines. It is also the oldest of all disciplines and has given a rise to modern science, both social and natural conclusions. After three millennia of philosophical discourse and disagreement, it is extremely unlikely that we will reach an exact consensus. My thoughts are that a philosopher is basically a person who engages in the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with the intention of improving or reconstituting them; this is otherwise known as the study of philosophy.
tied down so that they may not move or look backwards. All they see is
Plato widely a respected philosopher and is arguably one of the greatest philosophers of all time. I knew nothing about him or what he stood for before taking this course and I found his theory on human nature very exciting. “Plato’s most fundamental contribution to philosophy was the distinction he drew between the changing physical objects we perceive with our senses and the under changing ideals we can know with our minds.” What Plato means is when we see something that we think is good or bad that there is good strong reasoning behind why we think the way we do. I find this very intriguing because, this it pertains to how I feel about everyday things and big Icons. For example, when hanging out at a friend’s house that is considerably richer
Plato’s idea on the self is very simple yet complex. He has a different way of talking, which means that he either tells you what he means or he contradicts himself. He starts off saying that the soul, psyche, is the “thing” that causes things to be alive, but then says that “I” equals my soul. Does that mean that I cause myself to be alive? That thought can be very contradicting and complicated to understand. He then goes and says that the soul is different from the body. This thought is very complicated and makes Plato’s words very contradicting. On the other hand, Plato’s idea of self can be simple to understand if we take another view on it. We know that two things are constant in Plato’s search to find the answers for the soul and these