Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Forgiveness and its effects
The sunflower essays on forgiveness
The sunflower essays on forgiveness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal, Wiesenthal, a Jew in a concentration camp, is faced with controversial question. Should he forgive the dying SS man? Throughout the book, Wiesenthal mulls over his response to the SS man, Karl. Was it the right choice to leave Karl’s bedside or should he have forgiven him there? “Well, I kept silent when a young Nazi, on his deathbed, begged me to be his confessor” (Wiesenthal 97). If Wiesenthal had chosen to forgive, does that forgiveness include forgetting? Is is possible to forgive and not forget, or in order to forgive, is necessary to forget? Although it is easy to hold grudges and remember past wrongs, forgetting is a key step in forgiveness. If one does not understand the true meaning of forgiveness, how should understand how it truly works? Forgiveness is a communicative action. To forgive, one must “die to one’s self” by releasing his or her bitterness and/or wrath even if it is deserving. Not only is forgiveness “dying to one’s self’, but it is also giving mercy to the offender just as Christ has done for all of humanity. Mankind is broken and mard due to sin. However, because of Christ’s death and resurrection, humanity can made whole again. Unfortunately, humans still sin. God says to love one another. …show more content…
In Jeremiah 31:34, the Lord speaks to His chosen people. He states, “For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more”. Due to the fact that humans are imperfect by sin, they should strive to be like God because his is the only perfect example. Because the Lord is forgiving and forgetting, humans should also forgive and forget. In the symposium, Goulden speaks of forgiving and forgetting. “To forget all may be easy, but to forgive all must be something more than a pulpit platitude” (Goulden 157). All of the horrors can be forgotten. Life can move on, and people can forget the past. However, forgiving can take time. It is not something that should be “half baked” or done half heartedly. Forgiveness must be from the heart. Colossians 3:13 says, “Bear with each other and forgive one another if any of you has a grievance against someone. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.” Christ has forgiven everyone completely and repeatedly for the same sins. Mankind must do so also. In The Sunflower, Wiesenthal shares his opinion.
“The crux of the matter is, of course, the question of forgiveness. Forgetting is something that time alone takes care of, but forgiveness is an act of violation and only the sufferer is qualified to make the decision” (Wiesenthal 97-98). According to Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, violate means “to fail to show proper respect for” or ‘to abuse or show disrespect for usually by damaging it”. This would mean that the act of forgiveness is the failure to “show proper respect” or to show contempt for “usually by damage”. If this is the case, forgiveness is not an acceptable things. Forgiveness is not an acceptable things; it is something that God
does. There is a difference between forgiveness and reconciliation. Reconciliation is the action of restoring a relationship. For someone to forgive, the relationship does not go back to the way that it was. If someone were to show reconciliation, they would “mend the fence”. There is so much more to forgiveness than reconciliation. To forgive and not forget does not seem possible because the forgiveness may not be genuine. Forgetting does not allow records of wrong to creep and remind the someone of past experiences. Reconciliation and forgiveness are different. One can still remember the past in reconciliation even though relationships have mended. True forgiveness does not remember the past.
The author of my essay is Simon Balic and he is a historian and culturologist. The title of the work is, Sunflower Symposium (109-111). Balic wrote this essay thirty years after The Sunflower was written. Balic argues that he does not forgive the sufferer, although he does feel some remorse. The author supports and develops the thesis in a chronological order in order to take the reader through exactly what was seen, heard, and thought of during this time. Both Weisenthal and Balic had a liable reason to not forgive the soldier, “There are crimes whose enormity cannot be measured. Rectifying a misdeed is a matter to be settled between the perpetrator and the victim” (Wiesenthal 54). Through this, Balic was trying to speak to his audience of fellow historians.
Analysis and explanation of Wiesenthal’s actions When Simon was asked to forgive the SS officer, he blankly looked at the man, stood up, and left. One of the main problems that he faced is he definitely was not able to absolve the man of the crimes considering he could not speak for his entire people. Wiesenthal did not have authority to absolve the actions of those who were responsible for the holocaust nor did he want to in the first place. Different people have different ideologies about the way that one can accept forgiveness. Literature from the Jewish culture has a lot to say about this and understandably so.
Simon Wiesenthal’s book The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness spoke to me about the question of forgiveness and repentance. Simon Wiesenthal was a Holocaust prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II. He experienced many brutal and uneasy experiences that no human being should experience in their lifetime and bear to live with it. Death, suffering, and despair were common to Simon Wiesenthal.
As strong, independent, self-driven individuals, it is not surprising that Chris McCandless and Lily Owens constantly clashed with their parents. In Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into the Wild, Chris was a twenty-four-year-old man that decided to escape the materialistic world of his time for a life based on the simplistic beauty of nature. He graduated at the top of his class at Emory University and grew up in affluent Annandale, Virginia, during the early 1980’s. In The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd, Lily was a fourteen-year-old girl who grew up in the 1960’s, a time when racial equality was a struggle. She had an intense desire to learn about her deceased mother. Her nanny, Rosaleen, with whom she grew very close over the years, raised Lily with little help from her abusive father. When her father failed to help Rosaleen after three white men hospitalized her, Lily was hysterical. Later, Lily decided to break Rosaleen out of the hospital and leave town for good. While there are differences between Chris McCandless and Lily Owens, they share striking similarities. Chris McCandless’ and Lily Owens’s inconsistencies of forgiveness with their parents resulted in damaged relationships and an escape into the unknown.
In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from Thomas Brudholm, Charles Griswold, and Trudy Govier. The possibly raised objection, for this particular modified situation, of forgiveness being necessary to move on from Desmond Tutu will be countered with the logic of needing to eventually find an end somewhere.
Forgiveness is a process. You can still feel the pain, see the events behind your eyes, and feel the loss of the people around you but you have to find a way to forgive. People think that if you forgive someone you are forgetting or saying hey I would hang out with this person now because we’re cool but thats not at all what forgiveness is. Forgiveness is righting the wrong for yourself because you want the injustice you feel to leave. It’s acknowledging to that there a wrong that was done to you and you decide how you want to think about it not anyone
“Yes. I see them plain before my eyes…I can see the child and his father and his mother(Wiesenthal,47).” This heinous act committed by the soldiers Karl served with seemed to haunt him on his death bed. The memory of the families and the cries of innocents burning in that home seems to be one of the main things Karl is asking for forgiveness for. The memories seem to haunt him and before he dies he wants to make peace with the ghost of his life, not wanting to bring them into the afterlife with him. The memories of that event have weighed heavily on Karl’s conscious, and it seems if there were such things as a double take in life he would go back and find a way to help those innocents. Karl has a lot of deaths on his conscious not from acts he committed; however, from acts seen by him or acts that he did not stop. By asking for forgiveness from Wiesenthal Karl wanted to die knowing someone knew he was truly sorry for his actions and was willing to pay for them in the afterlife. Even though Wiesenthal was not a Jew whose Karl’s actions affected, his apology was for the community as an SS
The position to choose between forgiving one’s evil oppressor and letting him die in unrest is unlike any other. The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal explores the possibilities and limitations of forgiveness through the story of one Jew in Nazi Germany. In the book, Wiesenthal details his life in the concentration camp, and the particular circumstance in which a dying Nazi asks him for forgiveness for all the heinous acts committed against Jews while under the Nazi regime. Wiesenthal responds to this request by leaving the room without giving forgiveness. The story closes with Wiesenthal posing the question, “What would you have done?” Had I been put in the position that Wiesenthal was in, I would ultimately choose to forgive the Nazi on the basis
Forgiveness is to stop feeling angry, to stop blaming someone for the way they made a person feel, and stop feeling victims of whatever wickedness was directed towards them. Is forgiveness necessary? Can everyone be forgiven despite the circumstances? If forgiveness depends on the situation, then is it necessary at all? Does forgiveness allow someone to continue their life in peace? Is forgiving someone who causes physical pain to someone, as a pose to forgiving someone who murdered a member of the family the same? If someone can forgive one of these acts so easily can the other be forgiven just as easy? Forgiveness allows for someone to come to terms with what they have experienced. In the case of murder forgiveness is necessary because it allows for someone to be at peace with themselves knowing they no longer have to live with hatred. It also allows someone to begin a new life with new gained experience and different perspectives on life. Forgiveness is necessary from a moral perspective because it allows someone to get rid of hatred and find peace within him or herself to move on with their lives.
I stated before about how I would have forgave Karl for his wrongdoing to the Jewish people and others. The Holocaust was a tragic thing and we can all agree to that. When I think of the military, I think about learning respect for your commanding officers and other soldiers and civilians. Karl was commanded to shoot anyone who was trying to escape from the burning house so he listened to his orders when a family did jump. If I was there in Karl 's shoes, I for one would have shot the family when they jumped even though it would have been wrong and I wouldn 't want too. In the symposium responses, Lawrence L. Langer stated, "When we call the murder of a helpless Jewish father and a child a 'wrong, ' we ease the crime into the realm of familiar and forgivable transgressions and relieve ourselves of the burden of facing its utter horror" (188). No matter what word we use to describe the killing of millions of helpless Jews, it will still feel like what Langer
The Sunflower is about Simon Wiesenthal and his time as prisoner of the Nazis concentration camps during World War II. Simon Wiesenthal is also known as a Nazi hunter tracking down war criminals after the war. The setting of the book takes place in a concentration camp in Poland, where Simon was living prior to the war. One day he and other prisoners were moved into a work detail to collect medical waste from a german hospital in which it was Simons old high school. While working, Simon was pulled away by a nurse who took him to a dying man who was covered in bandages on his face. The mans name was Karl, a 21-year-old German soldier of the SS. Karl explained to Simon that he had requested the nurse for a Jew. Karl wanted to tell his story to
Simon Wiesenthal described his experiences at the hands of Nazi soldiers at a concentration camp in his novel, “The Sunflower.” This novel was based on true events, but the question that Wiesenthal raised at the end of his novel is where this story truly makes you step into his shoes and think about what you would have done during this horrific period in human history.
Ricard believes that “forgiveness is always possible and one should always forgive”. In his own response to Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he explains that there are different situations in one’s life that people can find it to be difficult to forgive. He also says that forgiveness does not mean absolution, which is a great point. If Wiesenthal did forgive the S.S man, that would not mean he would give him his absolution. The S.S man would have to earn his absolution through death, if his belief was in God. Perhaps Wiesenthal wouldn’t have felt so much regret in his lack of an answer if he had said that the S.S man was forgiven. Wiesenthal may have felt better about his stance of being a Jew being the first to forgive a Nazi. Ricard also said, “For the dying SS soldier, feeling remorse in recognition of the monsterousess of his deeps was a first good step. But he could have created much more good by telling his fellow Nazi soldiers to abandon their inhuman behavior”. Knowing now what others could have possibly done to the S.S man for saying something along the lines of that, he would have surely been tortured or killed by the more radical Nazi’s who truly believed Jews were the scum of the Earth. To summarize, Ricard deemed that Wiesenthal should have gave forgiveness to the S.S man, but to not forgive him for the people he had
A strong Christian lesson on the true nature of forgiveness can be found in Christ’s Sermon on the Mount:
Forgiveness is the act of releasing an offender of any wrong or hurt they may have caused you whether they deserve it or not. It is a decision to let go of resentment or vengeance toward a person or group of people. When we choose to forgive, we’re wiping the slate clean, cancelling a debt, or as I love to say, “Letting it go.” In the Bible, the Greek word for forgiveness literally means to “let it go.” This concept, “forgiveness,” is easier said than done. Majority of people find it very difficult to let go of offenses and hurts caused by others. I really do believe that most people desire to let it go, but we lack the knowledge of how to do it. As believers, we are instructed by God maintain an attitude of forgiveness.