Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness. Simon Wiesenthal
Elocution on importance of forgiveness
The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness. Simon Wiesenthal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Sunflower, Simon Wiesenthal wrote of an incident of the time he was a concentration camp inmate. He described life in the concentration camp, the continuous humiliations, the hunger, the illness, and the constant threat of death. Death was fearful, but death was not his only worry. When he was asked by a dying Nazi soldier for forgiveness, this tore him down, ultimately killing his heart and tearing him mentally apart. Having heard the first confession of a dying SS man, Weisenthal continued to be troubled by his refusal to give forgiveness. In the end of the book when he asked his readers what they would do in his situation, Weisenthal not only bore witness to a horrible event, but he invited all people to participate in the discussion of justice and forgiveness. Father Augustine - Catholic Perspective …show more content…
Father Augustine believes that God alone can really forgive sins.
There is no limit to God’s mercy or forgiveness. When we sincerely are sorry and ask for forgiveness, God forgives. We are all born with original sin, therefore, nobody is perfect and we all make mistakes. Since we are all human and make mistakes, there are no limitations on our ability and willingness to forgive like God, for he is our true role model of forgiveness. Just as God forgave, we can forgive, meaning we will give up our right to hurt others for hurting us. Father Augustine believes that when we forgive, we do not necessarily forget the event that occurred. Learning how to respond to an offense is one of the basic teachings of Christian life. To forgive is to make a new beginning and relationship with that person, by putting the past behind. So, we do not forget what happened, but we do not use that offense against the committer. In addition to Father Augustine’s belief on forgiving and forgetting, the bible does not say forgive and forget. There is no real total forgiveness unless there is a total commitment to forget. The effort to forget is as hard as it
is to forgive. A perfect example of forgiveness is St. John Paul II. This pope forgave someone who shot him, which caused a lot of confusion in the media. The media was shocked on how someone can forgive another person for trying to kill him/her. We, as Catholics, wish this became common because forgiveness is a teaching all Catholic follow. Just as Pope John Paul II did, when we forgive others, we relieve the burden of guilt on the committers shoulders. The example of our merciful father is for us to imitate this way. Also, forgiveness is the ultimate remedy, freedom, healing, and new beginning. Mercy can be preventative and eliminate before the offense actually occurs. Simon Wiesenthal shows mercy to the mother in his story. Overall, when we forgive we don't worry about the justice, God does, and our decisions are in his hands.
Simon Wiesenthal’s book The Sunflower: On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness spoke to me about the question of forgiveness and repentance. Simon Wiesenthal was a Holocaust prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II. He experienced many brutal and uneasy experiences that no human being should experience in their lifetime and bear to live with it. Death, suffering, and despair were common to Simon Wiesenthal.
In Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower, he recounts his incidence of meeting a dying Nazi soldier who tells Simon that he was responsible for the death of his family. Upon telling Simon the details, Karl asks for his forgiveness for what he helped accomplish. Simon leaves Karl without giving him an answer. This paper will argue that, even though Karl admits to killing Simon’s family in the house, Simon is morally forbidden to forgive Karl because Karl does not seem to show genuine remorse for his committed crime and it is not up to Simon to be able to forgive Karl for his sins. This stand will be supported by the meaning of forgiveness, evidence from the memoir, quotes from the published responses to Simon’s moral question, and arguments from Thomas Brudholm, Charles Griswold, and Trudy Govier. The possibly raised objection, for this particular modified situation, of forgiveness being necessary to move on from Desmond Tutu will be countered with the logic of needing to eventually find an end somewhere.
Thank you Mr. Wiesenthal for letting me be able to read and respond to your book The Sunflower. The Sunflower has showed me how ruthless it was for Jewish people in the Holocaust. In your book Karl, an SS solider, tries to get your forgiveness for the wrong he has done to the Jewish population. For a person to ask for forgiveness means that they have realized that they have done wrong and want to repent for their mistakes. The big question in your book was “What would you do?” I would’ve done exactly what you did I wouldn’t have granted the solider my forgiveness because he didn’t deserve it.
The unimaginable actions from German authorities in the concentration camps of the Holocaust were expected to be tolerated by weak prisoners like Wiesel or death was an alternate. These constant actions from the S.S. officers crushed the identification of who Wiesel really was. When Wiesel’s physical state left, so did his mental state. If a prisoner chose to have a mind of their own and did not follow the S.S. officer’s commands they were written brutally beaten or even in severe cases sentenced to their death. After Wiesel was liberated he looked at himself in the mirror and didn’t even recognize who he was anymore. No prisoner that was a part of the Holocaust could avoid inner and outer turmoil.
The position to choose between forgiving one’s evil oppressor and letting him die in unrest is unlike any other. The Sunflower by Simon Wiesenthal explores the possibilities and limitations of forgiveness through the story of one Jew in Nazi Germany. In the book, Wiesenthal details his life in the concentration camp, and the particular circumstance in which a dying Nazi asks him for forgiveness for all the heinous acts committed against Jews while under the Nazi regime. Wiesenthal responds to this request by leaving the room without giving forgiveness. The story closes with Wiesenthal posing the question, “What would you have done?” Had I been put in the position that Wiesenthal was in, I would ultimately choose to forgive the Nazi on the basis
Forgiveness is to stop feeling angry, to stop blaming someone for the way they made a person feel, and stop feeling victims of whatever wickedness was directed towards them. Is forgiveness necessary? Can everyone be forgiven despite the circumstances? If forgiveness depends on the situation, then is it necessary at all? Does forgiveness allow someone to continue their life in peace? Is forgiving someone who causes physical pain to someone, as a pose to forgiving someone who murdered a member of the family the same? If someone can forgive one of these acts so easily can the other be forgiven just as easy? Forgiveness allows for someone to come to terms with what they have experienced. In the case of murder forgiveness is necessary because it allows for someone to be at peace with themselves knowing they no longer have to live with hatred. It also allows someone to begin a new life with new gained experience and different perspectives on life. Forgiveness is necessary from a moral perspective because it allows someone to get rid of hatred and find peace within him or herself to move on with their lives.
Even after he loses his faith, his father proves to be a reason worth living.... ... middle of paper ... ... The other prisoners are getting fed up with his father’s behavior and are beating him, and Wiesel did nothing to stop it.
Eliezer Wiesel loses his faith in god, family and humanity through the experiences he has from the Nazi concentration camp.
“The Perils of Indifference” In April, 1945, Elie Wiesel was liberated from the Buchenwald concentration camp after struggling with hunger, beatings, losing his entire family, and narrowly escaping death himself. He at first remained silent about his experiences, because it was too hard to relive them. However, eventually he spoke up, knowing it was his duty not to let the world forget the tragedies resulting from their silence. He wrote Night, a memoir of his and his family’s experience, and began using his freedom to spread the word about what had happened and hopefully prevent it from happening again.
Mr. Wiesel had intended this book to describe a period of time in his life that had been dark and sorrowful. This novel is based on a survivor of the greatest Holocaust in history, Eliezer Wiesel and his journey of being a Jew in 1944. The journey had started in Sighet, Transylvania, where Elie spent his childhood. During the Second World War, Germans came to Elie and his family’s home town. They brought with them unnecessary evil and despair to mankind. Shortly after young Elie and thousands of other Jews were forced from their habitats and torn from their rights of being human. They were sent to different concentration camps. Elie and his family were sent to Auschwitz, a concentration and extermination camp. It would be the last time Elie sees his mother and little sister, Tzipora. The first sights of Auschwitz were terrifying. There were big flames coming from the burning of bodies and the crematoriums. The Jews had no idea of what to expect. They were not told what was about to happen to them. During the concentration camp, there was endless death and torture. The Jews were starved and were treated worse than cattle. The prisoners began to question their faith in God, wondering why God himself would
The delineation of human life is perceiving existence through resolute contrasts. The difference between day and night is defined by an absolute line of division. For the Jewish culture in the twentieth century, the dissimilarity between life and death is bisected by a definitive line - the Holocaust. Accounts of life during the genocide of the Jewish culture emerged from within the considerable array of Holocaust survivors, among of which are Elie Wiesel’s Night and Simon Wiesenthal’s The Sunflower. Both accounts of the Holocaust diverge in the main concepts in each work; Wiesel and Wiesenthal focus on different aspects of their survivals. Aside from the themes, various aspects, including perception, structure, organization, and flow of arguments in each work, also contrast from one another. Although both Night and The Sunflower are recollections of the persistence of life during the Holocaust, Elie Wiesel and Simon Wiesenthal focus on different aspects of their existence during the atrocity in their corresponding works.
It is beneficial that Wiesel published this, if he had not, the world might not have known the extent of the Nazi reign. He exposes the cruelty of man, and the misuse of power. Through a lifetime of tragedy, Elie Wiesel struggled internally to resurrect his religious beliefs as well as his hatred for the human race. He shares these emotions with the world through Night. Being confined in a concentration camp was beyond unpleasant.
Irish Playwright, George Bernard Shaw, once said, “The worst sin toward our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them; that's the essence of inhumanity.” Inhumanity is mankind’s worse attribute. Every so often, ordinary humans are driven to the point were they have no choice but to think of themselves. One of the most famous example used today is the Holocaust. Elie Wiesel’s memoir Night demonstrates how fear is a debilitating force that causes people to lose sight of who they once were. After being forced into concentration camps, Elie was rudely awakened into reality. Traumatizing incidents such as Nazi persecution or even the mistreatment among fellow prisoners pushed Elie to realize the cruelty around him; Or even the wickedness Elie himself is capable of doing. This resulted in the loss of faith, innocence, and the close bonds with others.
Holocaust- destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially cause by fire or nuclear war.(Google). Many are familiar with the Holocaust, brought on by Hitler and the he catastrophe that hurt families of millions. Years after, we learn of it as a historical trade guy, however before the holocaust students were taught other things. Things like being proud of their country; a patriot. Those born and raised in Germany were taught of their great ore WW1 as well as their downfall after the war. Proud citizens of Germany wanted to support their country any way possible: the young Germans were encouraged to join Hitler youth in order to put Germany back on top. A young man of Germany, known as Karl, did exactly that. Just like many German boys
Many people have forgiven others, but do we really have a responsibility to forgive each other? There are many examples of crimes in our society, including: The Holocaust, 9/11, and many more. Although these crimes happened many years ago, the severity of them have been unforgivable. A story that supports this idea is The Sunflower, Exploring Dimensions of Forgiveness, by Simon Wiesenthal. In Simon's story, he explains that he was in a concentration camp when he was called to the hospital. At the hospital, an SS soldier asked him for forgiveness after killing many Jews; which he did not forgive him after his wrongdoings. Another example of not forgiving is a response by Sidney Shachnow to Simons book. Sidney explains that the SS man can not be forgiven, because he murdered everyone that could. People do not always have the responsibility to forgive others for their acts or wrongdoings.