Food Inc Rhetorical Analysis

Food Inc. Rhetorical Analysis In Robert Kenner’s documentary film, Food Inc., the purpose is to inform Americans the reality of the food industry. The film illustrates the malevolent side of the food industry rather than an advertised image. Compelling images are used to show the horrors of the food industry such as the visuals of innocent animals being slaughtered and mistreated by the second. The claims that the film asserts have further expanded the ominous image of the food industry. Food inc. portrays a warning for Americans about what they are really eating, one can take a stand for better and safer foods. At any average supermarket, the meat aisle contains no bones in the meat. It has all become processed meat that does not come from a farm as all the top beef and pork producers advertise. The reality is not a farm, it’s a factory. A rhetorical strategy the film uses is the voices of the real victims of the food industry, out of all the farmers interviewed, only one spoke out and that shows the power

appeals to pathos by eliciting the feelings of bitterness and inhumane treatment of animals. The film shows all the meat factories where all the animals are mistreated and most are left to die if they aren’t “good enough.” Workers are shown throwing and abusing the chickens as they are being sent to the slaughter house. This gives the audience a sense of fear and outrage as it implies how the food industry is corrupted. Juxtaposes, Americans are able to oppose the sinister side of the food industry not only for themselves but also for the animals. The prospect of the people has changed due to the horrors of the food industry. Food Inc. creates a personal outlook that better relates to Americans. The rhetorical strategies convey the horrors of the food industry. One person can influence and use their to power to change the way food is produced. The documentary film conveys a message that hopefully changes the perspective of