More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on processed foods and its effects on humans
Essay on processed foods and its effects on humans
Essay on processed foods and its effects on humans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Food Inc. Is a very well made documentary, very explicit and very clear about how the food industry works and how everything has been altered through the years to comply people’s demand. While consumers are demanding more cheap and “qualified food”, thinking that the bigger and the colorful the better, Food Inc. makes clear how meats, grains and corn are not produced in a healthy way for people anymore. In the same way, they show how the workers are being exploited by these huge monster food companies more and also how they have literally “kill” small farms. These fill showed us a lot of information about what we really eat and it tries to let us know how what we think is healthy it isn’t. This film have people who are specialist in a specific …show more content…
The Daily Bread wanted more to impact the viewer visually instead of bringing expertise to talk about the topic. Although they did not invest that much money in the film and they just used a simple statement, they truly project a reality by using disturbing images, and make these images live in the viewer’s brain, so at the end maybe they could think before they eat. We didn’t have any kind of spoken information, we did not have any explanation, we did not need of any specialist to let us know how food industries work, and they basically just showed us what we don’t see. This film took us into the “Real World”, a world of terror. In my personal experience with both films I confessed that after watching Food Inc. I was feeling some guilt about eating meat; however, after watching the Daily Bread I just stopped eating pork and beef. That is how dramatic and shocking the Daily Bread was for …show more content…
Once again, Food Inc. explained with facts how this pig plants work. How they can be standing for so long being overweight. They also talk about the workers who are treated by companies like they were also hogs. Similarly in the Daily food, showing us the facts without explanation just with images of these pigs being killed, cut by half, and how the little pigs are being cruelly robbed of their sexual organs, and that sound of suffering when the workers were doing this, that sound itself was shocking. No word was said, but my eyes and my ears capture every images and sound of that cruel process. Once again I feel like Food Inc. is about understanding food industry and Our Daily Bread is a wake up for us and realized how what we eat is being
Throughout the film, various companies are exposed for promoting products in a manner that depicts the products as a healthy alternative. The ultimate exposing is done on the government and the USDA. The government is exposed for making deals with food companies to not demonize companies that sell unhealthy food. Even Michelle Obama 's "Let 's Move" campaign against childhood obesity started out bringing unhealthy companies to the light but died down by emphasizing exercise and not talking about food.This is largely in part due to a deal made with major corporations who weren’t too pleased with the original approach of “Let’s Move”. In addition, the USDA is exposed for promoting products such as cheese, milk, and high fructose corn syrup in a fictional way. They provided no information that they were unhealthy in the
In the documentary, Food Inc., we get an inside look at the secrets and horrors of the food industry. The director, Robert Kenner, argues that most Americans have no idea where their food comes from or what happens to it before they put it in their bodies. To him, this is a major issue and a great danger to society as a whole. One of the conclusions of this documentary is that we should not blindly trust the food companies, and we should ultimately be more concerned with what we are eating and feeding to our children. Through his investigations, he hopes to lift the veil from the hidden world of food.
The film enlightened me about many topics concerning the production of food. Although I would prefer not to view many of the graphic animal scenes I believe that they are necessary to present the arguments. I was also surprised to see the connections between so many political figures and the major corporations. I do not think that my eating habits will change, but I do think that I will give more thought to something before I eat it.
Food Inc. was a documentary produced by Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein that was about the dark sides of corporate farming and revealed how most of our food is produced. The film uses pathos, ethos, and logos to strongly get the points across throughout the film. The main point was that there is something wrong with our food and agricultural systems.
In the article “The End of Food,” Lizzie Widdicombe describes an advancement of our food culture through a new product developed by three young men living in San Francisco’s Tenderloin district. After failing to produce new inexpensive cellphone towers on a hundred seventy thousand dollar investment, the three men went on to try and develop software with their remaining funding. While trying to maximize their funding’s longevity, they realized that their biggest budget impediment was food. In fact, it reached the point where their diet comprised of mostly fast food, and eventually they despised the fact that they had to spend so much time and money on eating. Due to this hardship, Rob Rhinehart, one of the entrepreneurs, came up with the
As obesity and medical problems due to diet become a larger issue within society, it is imperative to educate humans on the importance of maintaining a healthy diet. This is exactly what Hungry for Change does. One of the key points made in the documentary is that humans no longer eat a natural diet like their ancestors did; when humans first began to inhabit the Earth they lived off a diet of fresh fruits, vegetables, grains, and meats. During these periods famine and disease was rampant, so humans adapted to store nutrition more productively. Now that humans live in a more developed society, they have a (practically) unlimited supply of food. However, much of this food is processed and manipulated to have a better flavour and a longer shelf life, and though this sounds like a positive situation, it has become a huge problem. According to best-selling women’s health author Dr. Christine Northrup, “We’ve lived on Earth for a millennium where there was a food shortage. You’re programmed to put on fat whenever there is food available. Now there’s a lot of food available, but it’s the wrong kind.” (Northrup, as cited in Colquhoun et al., 2012). This is a logical and widely accepted theory as to why humans continue to overindulge on foods despi...
In the documentary of Forks Over Knives almost everyone in America could agree that there is a major problem with our country's diet. Our overload of processed and fatty foods is only part of the problem. The over consumption of meat and dairy products is also a huge issue. I remember discussing a lecture in class when we discussed nutrition. Which is the process of providing the food or obtaining it necessary for health and growth. The farm animals are pumped with hormones and are tightly packed into lots. They are slaughtered in highly unsanitary factories. The idea that meat and dairy products are unhealthy cannot be expressed without making many people upset. The idea may seem radical, especially in America, but watching this film, there
What were the main points discussed in the film? The main points discussed in the film were that supermarkets seem like they provide a variety of food when in reality all of the food is produced by only a few major companies. Another main point is that the beef that we eat comes from cows that are neglected. They are eating corn instead of grass, which is not good for their digestive system, and E.Coli develops. Chickens are genetically changed to grow larger and faster than normal. The main point is that industries are dominating food production and cutting corners to make food cheap and fast. This is now harming us as consumers and could potentially get a lot worse in the future.
One critic perfectly captured my feelings towards the effectiveness of the film when he said, “It's one thing to know that fast food is bad for you. It's another to see that 'badness' demonstrated” -James Berardinelli. It’s common knowledge that fast food is not healthy, but seeing its effects firsthand creates a stronger desire to choose wisely when deciding what to put in your body. Though the documentary had overwhelmingly positive feedback, some critics find problems in it. As Peter Rainer, a thirty year film critic, asserts, “I'm not sure what Spurlock's escapade really accomplishes, except to emphasize that eating 5,000 calories a day, and exercising little, is bad for you.” However, Spurlock stressed many time throughout the film that his goal was to improve America’s awareness of nutritional eating as well as to see firsthand the effects of eating fast food on a person who rarely exercises anything besides the swipe of their credit card to pay for their Happy
“If you live in a free market and a free society, shouldn’t you have the right to know what you’re buying? It’s shocking that we don’t and it’s shocking how much is kept from us” (Kenner). For years, the American public has been in the dark about the conditions under which the meat on their plate was produced. The movie, Food Inc. uncovers the harsh truths about the food industry. This shows that muckraking is still an effective means of creating change as shown by Robert Kenner’s movie, Food Inc. and the reforms to the food industry that followed its release.
In the end, society has been negatively affected by the food industry in some of the most depressing ways possible. Whether it is taking advantage of workers, or pushing for a certain product, or even selling contaminated food with no remorse. Hopefully, the food industries can decide to run their businesses with less to hide, because it was unfortunate that not a single company had the courage to simply get interviewed at least once through out the movie.
is a great documentary that uses pathos, ethos, and logos, it is very easy while watching this film to agree with the all of the points made and opinions formed. However, this is a very biased documentary that does not necessarily tell the entire story behind these company’s business plans or ideas. Major companies such as Tyson, Perdue, and McDonalds all declined to interview for this film. By doing this, the viewer automatically forms a negative opinion and assumes that Food Inc. is correct in its claims. Also, this film uses an overwhelming use of pathos. As stated previously, the death of Barbara Kowalcyk’s son Kevin was life changing and tragic. However, the film abused the element of pathos by showing the home video of Kevin happily playing with family and some of his last moments before his death. This is a very one-sided documentary that does a great job of persuading the viewer to change or strengthen its opinion on the food
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
Like the human body, the ideas that will be discussed in this research paper revolve around food. Food is essential for the human body to function, grow, and survive. In addition to these physiological effects, food has developed culturural purposes, such as, for enjoyment, creation, and profit. The food industry in the United States has taken advantage of food’s purposes of enjoyment, creation, and profit. This advantageous behavior is done so in a way, that has altered the make-up of food; which consequently has altered food’s effect on the human body, no longer giving the human body optimal function, growth, and survival. Overall, the food industry and the alterations of food have not only negatively affected the animals and food used in production, but also the minds and physiology of consumers.
This book is a life changing book. It was inspirational, informative and gave you insight about the things we do not know about the food we eat. The documentary was graphic and detailed, informing you of the process from the farm or the fields, to the manufactures, to the labeling and packaging companies. It informed me, about the school lunches, how some of the meals at school are made, to the politics behind it. This book is also a collectible.