Following the Progress of an Enzyme Controlled Reaction

3587 Words8 Pages

Following the Progress of an Enzyme Controlled Reaction

Plan

----

Enzymes are a widely used source of biological catalyst; they are used

in widely in industry as in the biological aspects. Enzymes are

biological catalyst; this means that they will speed up a reaction

with out becoming used up. The enzymes for this by not actually

interfering with the reaction its self but basically align the two

substrates on the active site of the enzyme.

Amylases are widely spread enzymes that hydrolyse starch to maltose.

They are often found in two forms, a-amylase, which degrades starch

molecules into, fragments 10 glucose residues long and b-amylase,

which breaks down these into maltose, made up of two glucose

molecules. Both work by hydrolysis adding one molecule of water across

glycosidic link.

Hypothesis

----------

My hypothesis is that as the time of the enzyme reaction goes on the

amount of substrate reacted by time goes in a proportional

relationship.

In theory time Vs substrate concentration should have a proportional

relationship as the relative enzymes will all have plenty of the

substrate molecules to align with, therefore creating a constant time

for the reaction. The substrate being used is starch, starch is widely

found inn various substances. It is greatly found in bread, the starch

is a very useful nutrient for human life forms as it is the source for

sugars, which produce energy for the human body.

Starch begins to be broken down as soon as it enters the human body,

first salivary Amylase produced in the mouth and bucal cavity. In this

part of the digestion the starch is broken down to Maltose b...

... middle of paper ...

...e to assume it was o 0 every

time we used the apparatus.

Readings in the experiment were taken to the nearest whole unit, in

this case transmission %. The measurements of the meniscus can vary

from the different groups that carried out the experiment; there fore

a 1ml error may have occurred when transferring the reacting solution

into the iodine solution. This creates little change o the results and

is of no relevance to change the raw data to accompany this error.

Anomalies could be counted as the results show that the initial start

for the enzyme to start working on the substrate took up to 300 secs

and that the end of the experiment had no reason for a sudden decrease

in rate. I feel that this is an unexplainable anomaly, which cannot be

explained given the condition that the experiment was undertaken in.

More about Following the Progress of an Enzyme Controlled Reaction

Open Document