Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast flat tax and progressive income tax
Compare and contrast flat tax and progressive income tax
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should the United States Incorporate a Flat Tax?
One topic that every single person should be interested in is taxes—because we all are supposed to pay them. Taxes are not exciting, but a lot of work goes in to making “fair” tax brackets. But, what would it be like if we got rid of our current tax brackets and changed it into one single tax rate? First off, let’s briefly talk about our current system. The tax rates for a single income starts as low as 10% for income below $9,325 and ends as high as 39.6% if you make over $418,400. It’s a little complex since there are seven different rates that a taxpayer could fall into. However, in the grand scheme of things it is simple—the more you make, the more you pay. With this tax system the “winners” are the lower income taxpayers, and the “losers” are the higher income taxpayers. But let’s be honest, nobody wins with taxes. While most countries have tax systems that relate to the United States, there are a few countries that are using a flat tax system. This means that everyone pays the same tax rate. Whether it is a 10% tax rate like Mongolia and Kazakhstan, or a 45% tax rate like Greenland, everyone pays the same. With a 10% flat tax rate, if someone makes $10 they pay $1 in taxes, and if someone makes $10,000,000 they pay $1,000,000. Therefore,
…show more content…
If the U.S. were to make the flat tax high then most people’s revenues will go down, and if the U.S were to make the tax rate really low, people’s revenues will go up. However, if the tax rate was low, like 10%, then the government would lose an extremely large amount of money from the higher income taxpayers. Thus, the government’s revenue will go down, and the deficit would go up even more. Like what we learned while talking about the federal government budget, lower taxes sounds good, but will make the government’s deficit go up even more than what it already
The “Fairness of Taxation or Wealth Tax” is where taxes are calculated by the net worth of the person or the couple (household). This would be hard for tax collectors to determine each and every component of net worth of a person.
Should the American tax system remain the same, where individuals’ income is taxed based on how much one makes with loopholes and deductions? Should we consider a system that would eliminate progressive income taxes, taxing everyone at an equal rate through the Flat Rate Tax, or should taxes be collected through national consumption of retail goods and the Fair Tax System? Our current system of taxation is a varied percentage rate based on different income brackets. Many say that it violates our constitutional rights through unequal taxation. Multiple deductions, loopholes, special rates, and a complex system of regulations all characterize our Federal Income Tax System, prompting many to question why it is still being used (Peters, 2013).
The tax policy in the United States is very confusing. When the tax policy was originally written in 1913 it was four hundred pages. Now, over the past ninety one years, that tax policy has evolved to over 72,000 pages. Since the tax code has become so lengthy and nearly impossible to understand, the topic of tax reform has been in the minds of many. Although, most barely think about tax reform until tax season. It is a controversial subject due to the impact a change in tax code would have on the American people. The two most popular and widely known stakeholders in this debate are the two major political parties in the United States, the Democrats and the Republicans. The two parties share absolutely no common ground on the subject of tax reform, other than thinking the other parties solution is wrong. The Democrats, in general, want to raise taxes on the wealthy, while Republicans, generally, want to cut taxes for everyone (Democratic Party) (GOP). Unfortunately, with the United States economy currently doing so poorly, the parties can no longer afford to remain at a standstill, some sort of compromise is going to have to be made. The implementation of a flat tax, and discarding the current tax system would be a compromise that both parties can agree on and will simplify the tax code, overall benefiting all Americans.
II. Implementing a flat tax without significantly increasing the deficit is impossible without shifting the burden from the rich to the middle-class, instead our current progressive tax policy needs to be changed so that it is simpler and does not allow corporations to abuse the tax loopholes.
6. The flat tax replaces the current income tax code, which is very 7. complex, with a system so simple Americans could file their taxes on a 8. form the size of a postcard. What exactly is a flat tax? A flat tax sets 9. into place a single tax rate on all income subject to tax. The hundreds of 10. exemptions, credits, loopholes and deductions now in the tax system 11. would be eliminated to make the single tax rate as low as possible. The 12. cost of using the current tax system totals about $200 billion annually, 13. or $700 for every man, woman, and child in America. A flat tax would 14. reduce those totals by 94% , saving taxpayers more than $100
One person may see that the increase taxation on the poor and the decrease taxes on the wealthy is not an issue because the wealthy pay a lot of taxes already. However, many people don’t realize the fact that, yes, the wealthy are paying a lot of taxes because they make more money, but they can afford to pay more. Recently, in a CNN article, more than forty millionaires want their taxes to increase, which proves the fact that the wealthy have plenty of money to give back to the community. In addition, their just going to keep getting wealthier and wealthier by the
The flat tax will make taxes fair for all people. No matter what race a person is, what social class a person is in, or who they’re friends with, they will end up paying the same rate. Every single taxpayer will have to sacrifice just as much of his or her life as the next person down the road. One of the three main reasons for taxes is to maintain fairness. This is most reasonable ways to maintain fairness. The wealthy will still be paying more money than the poor person, but they both have the same tax burden.
No one enjoys paying taxes because it means giving up some of their hard earned money. Throughout the history of the United States, many people vote for the candidate that they feel will improve their financial situation. Most rich people vote for the candidate who wants to lower taxes on the wealthy, usually the republican nominee. Most lower class people vote for the candidate that they think will lower taxes for the lower class and cause the upper class pay more to cover for it, which is usually the democratic nominee. The two main candidates in this presidential election, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, have two very different plans for taxation and improving the economy if elected, both of which would benefit many people in various ways.
Everyone is France that is classified as “middle-class” pays the same tax, no matter what if their income is on the lower or higher end, promoting social equality within a certain tax bracket. However, the part of their system that is undemocratic is that the rich pay a much higher percent of their income, and people that have very low income do not pay income tax. The United States’ system is similar on the latter, but they have more broken down tax brackets that have the lower part of “middle class” citizens pay a lower percentage than the higher
The improvement of flat tax we will see an immediate benefits in agriculture. That will increase into jobs and labors. Where some people will believe it won't work. Federal Income to the tax income now compare to the flat tax is too drastic. They feel that government jobs, social program, and health care would suffer as the result in the decrease in the federal income taxes.
There has been much debate in replacing the current tax system with a national sales tax that would eliminate individual and corporate income tax, the capital gains tax, and the estate and gift taxes. With the national sales tax consumers would instead be charged on the final purchase of all goods and services at the retail level. If national sales tax were to be put into effect, it would change much of the current frustration with taxes. With the national sales tax there would be no need to file taxes by a deadline, since everyone would have already paid their share of taxes at the register throughout the year.
Donald Trump, Mark Cuban, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, all names quite familiar as some of the richest men in the world, as we know all these men are billionaire, however this argument is not only prompted on billionaires it is also towards millionaires and corporate CEO’s, we could say the top 1%, as well as for this argument we will be talking about the US economy and tax percent instead of the one here in canada. What is the statement we are speaking towards? Some people believe that the wealthier 1% or in other words millionaires and billionaires should pay more taxes, In my opinion I believe the wealthy should pay the same amount they are paying. Which is 37% for people earning 500,000$+, and not to mention that 37% is only