Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Art interpretation essay
Conceptual art Foutain
Interpretation of art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Art interpretation essay
Artist Statement – First Triptych¬¬ Piece
The theme of my triptych is about illustrating how ambiguous the perception of one’s appearance can have about an individual’s moral standpoint of being either a good or bad person as ultimately, there is no definite answer as they coexist in each person regardless of appearance.
The first part of my triptych depicts an individual that takes on a human form created with different lines and brushstrokes. This piece shows the appearance of the “bad” figure. In particular, there is no distinct human characteristics within this piece as I wanted this figure to be a generic human figure that can relate to the viewers. In relation to the overall triptych, this piece represents the “bad” of the piece. The human figure is distorted and blurred due to the violent strokes involved in the piece. These strokes can evoke emotions of fear and anxiety that are associated with unpleasant events, allowing to viewer to perceive that this individual is the “bad” one.
The key elements and principles of this first piece is lines and contrast. The lines created throughout the painting are placed everywhere from
…show more content…
diagonal, horizontal to vertical. This creates an emotional effect of anxiety within the piece. Furthermore, with different coloured line directions created contrast in the piece as it depicted warm colours against cool colours. Furthermore, contrast was created in the piece by the different textures created by the lines as they made certain areas of the individual more distinct than others. The medium used throughout this piece is acrylic paint of reds, blues, purples and white.
These colours were chosen as they are analogous colours on the colour wheel. In addition, I used some modelling paste towards the sides of the paintings to give a rough texture finish on the painting. While executing this composition, I used the technique of sgraffito on the canvas. I scratched away paint to create the fine lines with a palette knife and butter knife. I also used a squeegee and paint brush to help fill up space in the painting. In this composition, the style that I wanted to recreate was Gerhard Richter’s abstract expressionist paintings that used the squeegee as a key tool to apply paint and drag it across the canvas. His style often depicted his subjects very blurred, which is what I wanted to recreate in my
composition. Throughout the process of creating this piece, the difficulties occurred with the tools being used. Initially, in my proposal for my first piece, I wanted to use a squeegee to recreate Richter’s style; however, while using the squeegee, it rarely captured the effect of having many lines in my painting. It only filled in white space quickly. As a result, I added a butter knife to my use of tools for this piece because it helped me create many lines in a painting. Moreover, initially, I wanted to use the modelling paste to help thicken the paint, but I have come to realize how long it takes for modelling paste to dry and how difficult it was to use the butter knife around this medium. To resolve this difficulty, I took the modelling paste medium out of my idea entirely and applied to the edges of my canvas. Overall, I am content with the way the lines came out with the butter knife. It was a new experience with tools that are out of the ordinary, and I hope to use butter knives for the future pieces to come. Despite the fact that modelling paste was not the medium used majorly, I believe the overall piece was executed well as texture was still created with the acrylic paint itself,
Large and medium sizes of the forms dominate over small in the painting. The arrangement of the objects in this art piece is mostly centric. However, even though it is central, it is not symmetrical. The painter also touched the left edge of the burlap and the right bottom corner of it; this helps viewer’s eye to enter the painting smoothly, move around and escape from it. The asymmetry of the arrangement creates the sense of imbalance. Lam uses basic lines and shapes in the composition. Nevertheless, the painter creates wonderful light movement inside the figure with wavy shapes, which directs viewer’s eye from the top to the
The visual elements in this painting are shape, color and light. The shapes and contours of the mother and child are life like.
This painting consists of regular lines as well as implied lines. Some of the regular lines that have been included are flowing, curved lines, such as the Earth that the woman is sitting on top of. Additionally, the background is made of small scenes that have been outlined by a dotted line, which places emphasis on the scenes. Besides regular and visible lines, there are a few implied lines in this painting. For instance, the woman's eyes are looking forward, so there is an implied line to the audience. Additionally, another implied line would be the woman's right arm, which is pointed towards her headpiece, while her left arm is pointed towards the earth. Nonetheless, this painting is not intense; although it does have splashes of color, this painting does not have a bright saturation. Instead, this painting is slightly dull, which makes this painting appear vintage. Additionally, since this background is a dark color, it makes the rest of painting, especially the headpiece, stand out. Besides colors and lines, even though this is a painting and there is no physical texture, there is invented texture. Upon viewing this painting, underneath the earth where the woman is sitting on, there are roots as well as grass, which give texture and feeling to the painting. In the end, this painting consists of several elements of composition, which Heffernan has done a wonderful job
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
In addition, to the composition of the painting, the balance is also a dynamic factor. Both Ducci...
He also illustrates principles of design. If you were to place a vertical line on the picture plane the two sides would balance each other out. The painting can also be divided half horizontally by the implied divisional line above the horses head and the sword of the man who St. Dominic has brought back to life. Contour horizontal lines that give the expression that the dead man on the ground is sliding out of the picture plane, and dominate the bottom of the painting. On the top of the picture plane, behind the spectators is the brightest intermediate color, which is red orange that gives the impression of a sunrise.
...hese repeated vertical lines contrast firmly with a horizontal line that divides the canvas almost exactly in half. The background, upper portion of the canvas, seems unchanging and flat, whereas the foreground and middle ground of the painting have a lot of depth to them.
“Unfortunately, this moral looking-glass is not always a very good one. Common looking-glasses, it is said, are extremely deceitful, and by the glare which they throw over the face, conceal from the partial eyes of the person many deformities which are obvious to everybody besides. But there is not in the world such a smoother of wrinkles as is every man’s imagination, with regard to the blemishes of his own character” (112).” (Kelleher
The Interpretation/Meaning (III) will be written without any guideline points, the aim of this part will be to determine what the painter wanted to express with his piece of work and what it tells us in a symbolic or not instantly clear way. This part will also handle why the artist drew the painting the way he did it and why he chose various techniques or tools.
The purpose of this essay is to show how two different “creatures” such as Frankenstein’s ugly monster and the beautiful Dorian Gray are similar despite their different appearances.
“Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart” (Kahlil). People focus more on the outward appearance instead of the inward appearance. One’s inward appearance is comprised of their character, values, morals, and the true nature of their heart. On the other hand, the outward appearance is composed of one’s dress and grooming. The inward and outward appearance determines whether or not a person is ugly or beautiful. The choices that we make also define whether or not one is ugly or beautiful; choices made in the past can sometimes be repeated in the future.
The three most dominant elements are form, space, and value. The reason for this is that the inanimate or still objects in the artwork are dominantly three dimensional with illusions of depth and volume, as well as, colors or shades with light values and dark values. The three most dominant principles of design are emphasis, contrast, and balance. The reason for is this is that the artwork displays a contrast and difference towards the values and colors to direct focus and interest onto the work of art. The artwork dominantly consists of these elements and principles to emphasize the relationship and true nature between the insects, brittle leaves, fruits among the inanimate pillar draped in blue cloth.
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
1. Select one of the following pair of artworks and describe the differences you observe between them. Each pair consists of art of the Early Renaissance (Chapter 21) and that of the High and Late Renaissance (Chapter 22). Examine the composition, technique, position of the figures, and facial expressions, as well as any relevant elements of art and principals of design (see handout from September or Google “art elements and design principals”).
The formal and visual elements most utilized, recognizable, and original in Pablo Picasso’s Self-Portrait 1907 are line, texture, time, and color. As far as principals of design go, emphasis on proportion and scale of certain features makes them stand out, thus enhancing the expression of his face. I chose this artwork because the simplicity of the painting, especially the bold use of line, is appealing to the eye and looks like something I’d draw.