Financial Literacy Classes Should Not Be Mandatory In High Schools

477 Words1 Page

Everyone makes financial decisions on a regular basis of their day. It is important to be educated and informed but high schools now want to have financial literacy classes as a required course. Financial literacy classes should not be mandatory in high schools. The process would be expensive, ineffective, and students wouldn’t take advantage of the course, instead it would harm them. In order for high schools to have this course they would need more teachers. Hiring more teachers would mean more money. Source three states, “A required course would necessitate about 10 teachers each year and cost the system about $600,000 annually.” If it costs $600,000 for only a single county and all fifty states were to offer this mandatory class, it would cost major money for our economy. This means that the course would be a risky investment because it might work for some students but no one will know the results of the effectiveness of the class. Also if the course was required that would mean that all students will need to pass the course in order to graduate. …show more content…

Even though it is important for high school graduates to know how to make proper financial decisions there is no actual data to show if it is effective. In source three it states, “...while the district has piloted a financial literacy course, no local data has been collected on its effectiveness.” This means that if this course could possibly be effective, we wouldn’t see quick results until later on. Also if there were to be any changes it would have to be a major impact to our economy in order for the investment to be worth it. If the course ended up being ineffective it would be a major waste of money for the

Open Document