Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of the Church
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Role of the Church
‘The Magdalene Sisters’ is a 2002 Irish-British Feature Length Drama film Directed by award winning Filmmaker Peter Mullan. This film serves as an eye opening, public announcement film about the true story of three teenage Irish girls who are sent against their will, to the -now infamous Magdalene Asylums (commonly referred to as the ‘Magdalene Laundries’)- run by Catholic Nuns. In Ireland in the 60’s, women could and were often sent to these asylums for ‘crimes’ such as engaging in sexual activity or becoming pregnant outside of marriage. Once inside these laundries, they were forced into harsh, unpaid labour in the form of washing clothes. Although the film is set in Ireland in 1964, the film was in fact filmed entirely on location in the …show more content…
Mullan does not hesitate in portraying the events on screen (eg clerical sexual abuse, physical abuse, condemning the church). It is clear that he has researched his topic in great detail. His cast seem to fit perfectly into their roles. ‘Sister Bridget’ (Geraldine McEwan) the head nun, terrified me from the beginning, even when she said nothing. Eileen Walsh who plays ‘Crispina’, is tasked with portraying a ‘simple minded’ character who is possibly mentally challenged and she does so with flawless results. In the outdoor mass scene, Crispina screams at the priest: ‘You’re not a man of god’ and repeats this long after another Director would have yelled cut- this is important because it tells us me that the Director is directing from his gut instinct- Crispina doesn’t stop, she is enraged and wants to vent the years of built up anger at the priest. It appeared that the Director chose to completely ignore makeup (something that would be essential in hollywood cinema). The Director is staying true to his story and this is what earns him my …show more content…
What was very interesting to see was the cinematographers choice to light the ladies to emphasize their facial features in order to highlight their beauty. Writing: In many ways I felt that the plot (escaping the asylum) was predictable, but I never felt bored by it. At the ending of the film I was very disappointed when the director didn't show us what happened to all the characters, he merely told us via title cards which felt like a lazy move on his part. But the dialogue felt very authentic- I frequently felt that I was in fact watching a documentary it felt that real . Music: On one hand I felt the director underutilized the use of music in this piece, but on the other I figure the Director wanted this effect- he let the scene, and its silence convey the true horror. He didn't want to use music to control how the audience felt. The ending song felt particularly poignant and worked extremely
protagonist postulant Mariette Baptiste. Hansen’s challenges readers to explore beyond his descriptive narrative to find further meaning in the themes of suffering, power, and gender. Mariette Baptist represents a prideful, young woman who challenges and undercuts the Priory of The Sisters of The Crucifixion through her eccentric faith. Mariette’s piety generates discourse within the convent about the sincerity in her disposition for a religious life. The sisters are challenged to see Mariette’s faith as real and pure. Her religious practices involving self-inflicted penances disrupt the conventional ways of the priory. Furthermore, Mariette implores herself
... If anyone is being accused of molesting a child, the reputation that they’ve got will be ruined forever. There’s no going back, she leaves him with nothing, other than a dirty slate, whether or not he is guilty. This nun gets her way, and her certainty drove her to believe something that was never proved to be true. Her authority and the wall she’s created between herself and everyone else makes her credible. His compassion was mistaken for something that he didn’t do. She had the upper hand, with her manipulation skills. The Sisters are her puppets as she remained in control of her parish. Father Flynn’s leave does affect Sister Aloysius, her certainty vanishes but the only thing that somewhat puts her at ease, is that she wants to believe that his leave, was his confession. Sister Aloysius has doubts that crush her in the ending scene. She caused her own demise
Overall, the score was beautiful and appropriate, adding suspense and mystery at all the right times. The sound effects added psychological flavor to the story without drawing too much attention to it.
All in all, it was a pleasure reading the novel and watching the film. They were distinctive in the manner how they portrayed the story but they were unique since they managed to get the idea of the story across in two disparate ways. My feelings for the story have overgrown because it is such an attractive and innovative piece of writing, with a glowing sense of grief and helplessness and reality, which force the reader to involve with the hauntings of Arthur.
The films musical score alerts the viewer to an approaching attack of the shark and they automatically build this association with the music in their mind. Horror films often make use of high string instrument notes that irritate viewers and increase tension. Music plays an important role in film editing and the editor must choose its placement wisely to ensure its intended effect on the viewer’s mind and
them as unattractive and menacing and everything about this scene is threatening and ugly and makes the audience feel uncomfortable impact. in the audience of the. The music is like funeral music, loud and sad. The... ... middle of paper ... ...bloodshed and murder that follow.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
In brief, the audience can see how this 1931 sound film could be shaped by sound in a number of ways. Considering that sound at this time was a new phenomenon it is understood why mostly diegetic sound was used over nondiegetic sound. This director also showed the audience how the story could be affected by sound with examples like the clock becoming a character and storyline of its own and also the murderer being identified with his whistling. With the lack of sound and the collage of images during specific times, the director was able to create a mood without music or sound. Apparently this was a technique that was learned throughout his many years of silent films. These details were what brought the story together and would not have been done so precisely without the technique of sound.
By dissecting the film, the director, Jennie Livingston's methodology and the audience's perceived response I believe we can easily ignore a different and more positive way of understanding the film despite the many flaws easy for feminist minds to criticize. This is in no way saying that these critiques are not valid, or that it is not beneficial to look at works of any form through the many and various feminist lenses.
“Apocalypse Now” is a legendary war film directed by Francis Ford Coppola. The film’s main theme is devastation, violence, and horror. In this film Coppola thoroughly scrutinized the main characters ideas, behavior, and emotions to depict the darkness and the horror of war. His goal was to make the audience part of the horror. He wanted the audience to have a tremendous impact on this film and he succeeded with the perfect use of sound and editing in the ending sequence of his film. I will demonstrate how Coppola exploits a wide array of sound and editing to create suspense, intensity, and anxiety in the sequence to affect the audience’s emotions, using diegetic ambient sound effects, non-diegetic music, voice over and four editing types.
generate moods, and have great psychological affect. This is just as true for the very first series of shots for the film, and perhaps more important since these first shots will give the audience the initial feeling of the film, and set a tone for the picture. The first shot is highly dramatic in its lighting method, and the audience is drawn in immediately to one single detail. A man begins revealing the details of a tragic incident that befell his daughter. We don’t see who he is talking to. There is a spotlight directly above the man, and this is pretty much 95% of the light used. This really lights up the top of his head, which is bald, but there is no hot spot or reflective element which is good because reflection here would be aesthetically displeasing. The lighting causes dark areas under the man’s eyes, which emphasize the passion and eventually the hatred of what he is talking about. The scene is lit so that the background is completely black, so that the only thing we can see is the man. Even though this is logically unrealistic, the stylistic decision to light in this manner is warranted, since this or any other good film draws heavily upon our expectations and imagination to convey a message or meaning. We as audience accept the unrealistic elements, if they assist in making the story ...
I really liked when the scenes where the image and sound both work together great. I refer to the silence as nothingness and feeling alone because that describes the dark silences perfectly. It is definitely the most prominent part in the movie, and I think more movies should try to use silence to their advantage. I absolutely think that the movie uses silence expressively. For one thing, they are in space so there isn’t a lot of noise in the middle of the galaxy, but for some reason when I think back to when there were shots of the rocket ship in the dark galaxy I think of how the film makers made there be no background noise except the ship which was nice because it made it seem very realistic. Usually in movies there is a lot of background music that you don’t notice, but it helps the scene out. In this case the director used silence to make the scenes more realistic. I think of the scene where Matthew McCaughey goes into the dark hole. He was narrating at the time then suddenly you hear dead silence. It made me have a deeper connection with the movie because the movie was silent, but so were my thoughts. When I think back to the movie, I don’t remember there being a lot of music because it all just blended in, then I went back to see if they had anything special about their music I noticed all the different types of music they had throughout the movie. (This is all referring to my discussion post from chapter
Overall, the film isn’t half as epic as Emmerich’s previous. blockbusters or half as entertaining. The dialogues are about as interesting as watching paint dry and the bland characters have about as much depth as a puddle in the street! The storyline isn’t exactly. deep, introspective stuff, either.
...100 years, it is vital that viewers understand that this is a flawed system and that this is not only the fault of the church. Despite this fact, most viewers will likely make the inference thatthe nuns were partially victims to this system themselves.
Although admittedly some scenes have a comical side to them, Besson's fast paced action and gruesome images hold the tension and suspense brilliantly. His use of close-ups and camera movements, especially the subjective stance used by the victim, convey the feelings felt by the characters and the way in which they behave. Sound plays a crucial role in the opening sequence because, in my view, it is used to control the level of suspense and intrigue.