Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's liberation movement 1960s
Women's liberation movement 1960s
Women's rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Women's liberation movement 1960s
I remember as a young child, wondering why some people who liked female were not wearing pink and ruffles or why they weren’t wearing makeup. The social movement used to relate to the social experiment conducted was the Women’s liberation movement, also called feminists movement. Feminism is “support of social equality for women and men in opposition to patriarchy and sexism” (Macionis, 2017). The following paragraphs will discuss how the social experiment was conducted, and how literature influenced feminists activists to make a change on how women are treated and how women want to express themselves. The social experiment conducted was closely related to feminism and how females should look, but the norm of women wearing makeup and ruffles …show more content…
Dressed in unisex clothing, no makeup or hair done,like usual. I browsed the makeup section, and men’s clothing section. Some men's clothing was in the cart and I held a beige purse. During broking the norm, many people starred at me as I grabbed the men’s clothing and held it up to myself. I tried not to communicate with my friend as she observed the others watching me. I believe that some children, girls were affected the most. One little girl said to her mom “ why is that girl dressed as a boy? I want to dress like that!” I feel as if many children looked at me and wondered why I looked like I was dressed more masculine, rather than more feminine. The children also probably wondered why I was in the men's section instead of the women's section. I do not believe males were affected in the process of conducting the social experiment unless they felt uncomfortable that I was shopping in their section of clothing. My target was to influence women who do not like dressing feminine to dress how they want and not let anyone bother them. I kind of felt awkward making the changes to myself because usually I wear a lot of makeup and a v neck type of shirt with skinny jeans or sometimes a dress. So it dress out of my comfort zone was a little odd. Breaking the norms I felt nervous and a little unsteady. I second guessed myself multiple times while walking into the men’s section. My friend kept laughing at me and at first I couldn’t make it look like I was seriously shopping for men’s clothing. Soon I got over it and just broke the norm. It was pretty difficult to break the norm, as many people I knew were walking past and saying hi and I did not look like my normal self. It was very difficult for me not to talk to others about what I was doing. Mostly because I knew some of the people and they asked why I was not dressed like myself. It was hard to keep character or what I was trying to portray when
Lynn Peril writes a fascinating study of pink color and its historical connection to ideas and beliefs of femininity. Peril translates and defines Pink Think as collection of specific ideas, beliefs, and approaches of how and when is feminine behavior considered as proper. Throughout her book, Peril is pointing out various fundamental approaches and attitudes that are considered to be crucial for women achievements and accomplishments. Peril's Pink Think also advocates how greatest concern of femininity is related to women physical appearance (fashion and beauty) and their marriage (motherhood and housekeeper). Furthermore, Peril is demonstrating an evolution of femininity, and constant and intense impact of its norms and rules on women lives.
In the article, “The Fashion Industry: Free to Be an Individual” by Hanna Berry, Berry discusses how for decades women have been told to use certain products and that if they used those products they would be beautiful. Women over the years have believed this idea and would purchase items that promised to make them prettier, thinner, smarter and even more loved. However, in reality it was never what they wore on their bodies that helped them be any of those things; but what it did help with was to empower women to become fearless and bold by what they chose to wear on their bodies as a form of expression.
The media was all over the change in society and came out saying how the style was more comfortable compared to the cumbersome and restrictive style before (8). An anonymous person states this about the change in the past, “revealing clothing and visible cosmetics worn by young women were the cause, or at least a consequence, of this new conception of female sexuality” (qtd. in Cleve 2). Another anonymous person states, “They feel that beauty is not incompatible with modesty.” (qtd.
Today we can see items of clothing that are commonly worn that have grown out of this initial innovation of freeing a woman’s body. This can be seen in clothing from the Spring 2017 New York Fashion week (see Figure 2), as the model’s bodies are freed by the more minimal use of material. The lowering of necklines and the increase in skin shown in haute couture over the decades is owed to Art Deco fashion and is symbolic of the rise of women’s rights over the years, as the physical discomfort and restrictions that the tight corsets of previous eras could be considered of women’s place in society. The new style being a stance against the oppression. It dictates that a persons own comfort and style is to the upmost importance, not to contort one’s body into something it is not meant to. Today it is shown in loose and cropped pants, shorts, low necklines, cropped tops, and various other clothing that reveals skin that was once covered. Art Deco fashion is also seen today through “chic garçonne” ideal that emerged out of early feminism that made women want to do the same things that men could, and so adopted smoking, sport, an interest in vehicles, a flirty sense of
In “Marked Woman, Unmarked Men”, Deborah Tannen argues many points about how women are targeted based on their style choices, such as makeup, clothing and hair, as well as their last names, and titles they choose to take on. Tannen argues her stance when she says, “Each of the women at the conference had to make decisions about hair, clothing, makeup and accessories…. Men can choose styles that are marked, but they don 't have to… . Unlike the women, they had the option of being unmarked.” here you can clearly see that Tannen is illustrating her point by showing the difference in how men are looked at compared to women. She clearly believes that men don’t have to take their style, and lack of makeup, into consideration. In other words, this is a perfect representation of her argument in “Marked Women, Unmarked Men”
Sarah Crawley’s article, They Still Don’t Understand Why I Hate Wearing Dresses: An Autoethnographic Rant on Dresses, Boats, and Butchness, draws on how society distinguishes appearance, responsibility and expectations in regards to women and men. She observes the gendered discrimination people often have, for women in particular, using her personal experiences; she focuses on women wearing or performing tasks that are strongly associated with femininity, contrary to the‘masculine’ responsibilities that are designated for men. In the article, Crawley expresses her disassociation of the typical gendered traits for both women and men, by being butch. Butchness, Crawley explains, “is a practice in a sexist, heterosexist culture that engages female-bodied people in the expression of ableness” (81). By performing butch, Crawley breaks away from what
Today’s American women are following centuries old traditions of rebelling against society’s outlook on women around. Earlier in America’s history, it was unheard of for a woman to be in both the public and domestic sphere. Women were forced to spend most of their life in the domestic sphere, and wear ridiculous clothes everyday. For a long time, women have been degraded and pushed around, causing women to initial movements to change the way society treats women. In America, “the land of the free”, women have to fight for their equal rights. Reformers, such as Fanny Wright, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Amelia Bloomer and many more have done so through their actions, and speeches. Nevertheless, in recent times fashion has become an available source of expression. It is a powerful tool to be able to be seen and not heard--but still get the message across. Since its humble beginnings, fashion has oftentimes just existed, but in the past century, it has existed as a form of expression, art, and liberation Now, women are still being influenced and challenged by the media and their peer, but slowly, more and more women are standing up for themselves.
Women used to dress very conservatively and strict before the turn of the decade. Clothing consisted of fitted dresses, long skirts, and corsets in lady like manners. Since the 1920’s brought women’s rights along, young women decided that they were not willing to waste away their young lives anymore being held down to the rules; they were going to enjoy life. The younger generations of women were breaking away from their old habits and their fashion statements changed their roles in society completely. Women were modeling their lives after popular icons...
In the early 1900’s the ideal woman would be dressed with long dresses and would normally have long hair. Several events such as World War I, in July of 1914, changed women’s role in society. They were not only taking care of the children and the household but they were also taking the role of a man. As men went to war, women replaced them in factories. This caused woman to be more independent. Women realized that having a job was something that could be done; their sex didn’t restrict them from taking this action. This was extremely important as it lead to women being more confident and capable. In the 1920s young women began to change. They went from having long dresses and long hair, to a short haircut and wearing dresses that were above the knee. Women developed a greater interest in looking attractive. According to Russell L. Johnson, the beauty industry grew rapidly as cosmetic expenses sky rocketed from 750 million to 2 billion dollars (Johnson 3). This was one of the causes of the sexual revolution. Women became “ less formal but more expressive (Mag...
When thinking about the colors blue and pink, the very first connotation for many people that arises is the sex of a child. The tradition of wrapping a baby boy with a blue towel and wrapping a baby girl with a pink towel has been carried on from generations to generations to the point that society has failed to recognize its arbitrary societal norm. Today’s feminists believe that the term gender and the act of gendering are nurtured from birth until societal norms and expectations are indoctrinated into the brains of individuals. Parents and society categorizing humans based on their sex do not end with colors nor does it end at childhood. The idea of gender being the result of social construction can be portrayed immensely in various forms such as language, media and education as they all provide many evidences to illustrate the overt distinction of the roles of male and female. The concept of masculinity and femininity are taught to children by parents, which ultimately sculpts physical and emotional behaviors of individuals. Modern day feminists have shed light to how humans has been oblivious towards the sexist and stereotypical gendering that is constantly executed by today’s culture and have taken extensive measure to make amends. Whether it is explicit or heedlessly, gendered society cannot be avoided due to constant exposure from the cultural customs. It is naïve to ignore the consequences of social construction in gender roles, as it is society that dictates the ideal concept of what it means to be a certain gender.
I was criticized for minor things like getting my clothes dirty or refusing to stay still to get my hair done. These comments grew more and more frustrating as I got older and eventually became far more critical with references to how I played, the clothes I chose to wear, and even being told I was too loud and that my interests weren’t normal. When me and my grandmother went to visit other family member’s I would always be asked questions that seemed entirely inappropriate to me as a small child like whether or not I had a crush or a boyfriend but I noticed no one ever asked my male cousins these questions as though their value wasn’t based solely on their ability to attract the opposite sex. My disinterest in things like hair and make-up led to me falling behind my peers when it came to matters of appearance. While other girls were discussing their extensive morning routines I was showering and shoving my unruly hair up into a ponytail. This also meant that I was falling behind when it came to personal relationships as my female friends were discovering boys, boys were treating me like an anomaly. I was consistently asked if I was a lesbian
When a person hears words like feminist or feminism, notions of what it means to be feminine, or consequently unfeminine, begin to dimly form in our mind’s eye. Although we cannot definitively answer the question of what is feminine, we are able to recognize it when we see it or its absence. This conception, however, is arbitrary at best. What is it about an evening gown that seems to define and dress the feminine aura while a woman spitting would be denounced as inherently unfeminine?
The social construction of gender leads to the creation and sustainment of sex roles that we have been taught to adhere to since birth that results to social doings through the creation of gender – who we talk, how we dress and who we associate with. Men are taught to masculine qualities like not crying and women are taught to do feminine characteristics like playing with dolls and wearing dresses. A prime example of this is in the article written my Diane Reay, that analyzes the construction female behavior, where those who identified as “girlies” care about their appearance and we regarded to as stupid by their classmates. Those who challenged the feminine norms, where referred to as “spice girls” and labeled as bitches or little cows by their teachers because they where thought to be negative influences to the rest of the class. Reay states that, “boys maintain the hierarchy of social superiority of masculinity by devaluing the female world,” (Reay, 2014, pg. 257) by esteeming males over females, it creates gendered expressions that depict once gender more promising that the other in society, where self-declared tomboy Jodie stated that, “Girls can be good, bad or- best of all – they can be boys,” (Reay, 2014, pg. 257) which solidifies the social norm of males being better than
...she wore her dress at a school dance is similar to the reactions that my family and old friends are having seeing me dressed extremely feminine attire. High school was never a place of self-exploring, it was a place to make one self-identity early and you had to stick with it. If you tried a new style or look you were given the title of fag/slut, because you are confused and only fags/sluts are confused in the high school world.
...rimenters would like to discover. If the experimenters are wanting to focus on gender norms, a more decisive way would be to tease this apart would be to have the confederates cross-dress, but be dressed up while cross-dressing. If the experimenters want to learn more about presentation of self and response of the world, but not taking into account gender norms or expectations, a study taking place in various settings, requiring different types of helping behavior would be best to see the external validity of this idea. Depending on the helping behavior that is required in the cross-dressing experiment, one would again expect more hesitation compared to those complying with gender norms. If the experiment focused on one’s presentation, one would expect that to an extent, the more effort and care it seems that one has put into themselves, others will respond in kind.