Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The issue of genital mutilation in women at point zero
Female genital mutilation eassy
Female genital mutilation eassy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“I was dragged to a fence covered in leaves, and they took the blindfold off. I could see the other girls bleeding and sobbing in pain. I saw an old woman holding a knife so sharp I could see the drops of blood sliding down the edge. It was the blood of the girls.” Aisha was one of the many victims of female genital mutilation (FGM). Before I proceed, it’s worth asking what the term mutilate actually means: to injure, disfigure and maim severely. Let’s take a moment to take this in. What do these words tell us? It’s horrific, violent and disturbing…need I go on? Child abuse is synonymous with in its name. It is torture. Over 130 million girls and women worldwide have undergone FGM. 137,000 girls and women are living with the consequences …show more content…
We know this is a vile practice, yet we do nothing to stop it. Even though it is illegal in the UK, many still culture condone FGM and employ qualified doctors to carry it out. One was Dhanusan Dharmasena who carried out the illegal practice on a young mother after her childbirth in the UK. He broke the law by re-inflicting the FGM insisting he was unaware of this practice being illegal in the UK. This is ridiculous! There is no reason to condone FGM. It is barbaric. Even worse, the poor victim in this case was questioned as she did not have an interpreter to help her understand the grotesque situation she was about to encounter. The law relating to FGM needs to be rigid enforced. These cases illustrate how the UK is turning a blind eye to FGM. The illicit practice of FGM needs to be publicised more. It is still happening in the UK and we are doing nothing about it! When the current generation is fully informed of this ongoing torture, they will feel …show more content…
It is said that types of FGM are performed so that girls cannot experience sexual pleasure before marriage, as it is viewed as “unclean.” But what about after marriage? The condoning families want the girls to bear children once they are married but what they don’t realise is that one of the possible long term effects of FGM is infertility. People performing this practice are contradicting themselves. Guardians want to limit sexual pleasure as it is known that many girls under the age of consent are engaging in intercourse. There are other ways to stop this yet they still go for the option of cruelty, child abuse and torture which may even lead them to
I argue that female genital mutilation (FGM) should not be covered under the universal code of ethics when dealing with cultural tolerance, parents should not be able to make harmful decisions for their children, and doctors are under no obligation to perform such rituals to conform to the beliefs and traditions of their patients such as in cases of
Freedom of choice is a desire for most, but as we are young we depend on the decision of our parents. With this dependent nature of a child the freedom of choice is limited, for males this can lead to a life long consequence. Male circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin; the skin covering the head of the penis. Circumcision is practiced for religious purposes in Jewish and Muslim communities. Normally, the boy’s age varies from 4 to 11 years old. In the United States, this procedure is also done but without a religious purpose. The boys in this case are commonly newborn. This practice became popular after medical groups claimed that there were many health benefits that came with circumcision. Though it has been proven otherwise, it is still a common practice in the U.S. fueled by ignorance. Circumcision is an unnecessary surgery that leads to psychological problems, issues with sexual activities and lasting physical damage.
Today, 85 to 114 million girls and women in more than 30 countries have been subjected to FGM. Female genital mutilation has long been performed to ensure chaste or monogamous behaviour by suppressing female sexuality. It is commonly -- although erroneously -- attributed to religious edict. In fact, neither Islam nor Christianity officially sanctions it.
There are many arguments for and against the banning of brit milah that have a major factor in the decision of such a ban. Many arguments for the ban do have rational reasoning however, the views for opposing side are much stronger. Firstly, according to the human rights code, all human beings should be able to make their own decisions about their body, therefore avoiding the violation of physical integrity(Putzke). All humans should be able to consent to their genitals being tampered with especially since this procedure is not medically necessary to the child’s health(Ibid). Any health risks, such as HIV will not come into play until the man ...
...rvices as a cause of the sexual attitudes, patterns and trends existent in society today. Undoubtedly, a multitude of wider factors are to blame. The extent of availability has also been deemed a weakness due to potential health complications. However, no medical advance or regulation reform can rid a procedure of risk. From looking at the strengths of the approach, it is clear that regulations inflict little disruption on the lives of patients. Most importantly, the British approach to abortion eliminates any desire or need to undergo an unsafe termination. Changing regulations in regards to restrictions of abortions may undermine this strength which may cause the re-emergence of high maternal mortality rates. Therefore, the strengths overpower any of the aforementioned weaknesses. The British approach to the regulation of abortion is in no serious need of reform.
Often, this procedure is done with no anesthetic. Human rights advocates rally that it’s against the basic rights of a human being. For over forty years, weathers have advocated against FGM with no success. Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism come into play when advocating against other cultures, traditions and beliefs. Western societies compare their own culture to the groups in Africa and East Asia.
An estimated 39 million survivors of childhood sexual abuse exist in America today (Darness2Light, 2009a ). This figure continues to grow daily as perpetrators of this crime continue in this destructive path. The definition of child sexual abuse is the force, coercion, or cajoling of children into sexual activities by a dominant adult or adolescent. Sexual abuse of children includes touching (physical) sexually including: fondling; penetration (vaginal or anal using fingers, foreign objects or offenders organs; oral sex, or non-physical contact including: sexual comments; indecent exposures; masturbating in a child’s presence; child prostitution or child pornography (Child Welfare, 2009a).
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is an ancient traditional non-therapeutic surgical procedure that involves total or partial removal of the external parts of female genitalia. This paper aimed to define and classify FGM, identifies the prevalence, describes reasons for performing the practice, and concentrates on the problems associated to this practice with regard to women’s health, religious beliefs, and socio-cultural, behavioral and moral consequences. Researches and survey reports that the global actions have been taken to reduce or abolish the prevalence of the practice will be assessed.
A tradition is a tradition. Some of these women feel it is okay to undergo this procedure, and who are we to tell them otherwise? Other women are forced to go through with this, and those are the women we need to try and help.
Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) has had different definitions in the ‘Scientific World’ and the world of those who embrace the act. According to the definition of the World Health Organization (WHO), Female Genital Mutilation is the act of removing the external parts of the female genitalia, partially or totally for non-medical reasons (WHO) whereas the practitioners see it as the cutting of “extra skin tags” of the female’s reproductive organ. Various reasons have been put forward to support it, ranging from social, cultural and religious reasons, mainly in the so called Islamic communities. FGM is a violation of the rights of the girl child, causes health implications and drastically disempowers the sexuality of women.
Some countries have banned Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) but some societies continue to perform this procedure. Likewise, coming from an anthropological perspective, I understand why cultures and societies perform Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). But as a young woman and a Westerner, I feel as though the girl should have a choice, and worry about the negative consequences of having the Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) surgery. In conclusion, Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) leaves non-Westerns wondering who came up with this procedure. Works Cited Anonymous, Female Genital Mutilation.
Furthermore there are some African cultures who accept the female genital mutilation. That is something that in the rest of the world is considered unethical and it is being banned by the law, so according to the African cultures it is right for women to cut their genital organs and on the other hand it is right for us to understand that even though that seems harsh and wrong , this is a different culture and we should be able to understand and accept it. The reason that these people do it includes social acceptance and the fear of social exclusion, religion, the feeling that they should belong into a social
Many question whether female circumcision (FGM, genital cutting, etc.) is a form of abuse, is it a humane and morally acceptable practice and how can we fix this horrendous practice? These assumptive thoughts are typically made through the eyes of outsiders, female circumcision is many things and must be looked at through such a lens. Despite, all of this female circumcision is still framed very commonly between these three views, female circumcision is abuse, is a result of patriarchal societies, and is a cultural and religious practice.
The United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women defines gender-based violence (GBV) as, “Any act…that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual, or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private life.” It is also broadly defined as any harm to a person due to the power disparities caused by gender inequality. Gender based violence includes childhood sexual abuse, “prenatal sex selection in favor of boys, female infanticide, dowry deaths, honors killings ,female genital mutilation, trafficking and forced prostitution, forced early marriage, sexual assault and intimate partner violence”
...sued a public statement, endorsed by 500 doctors, declaring their opposition to the attempted repeals. The UNICEF-European Union programme on FGM/C, which began in 2008, concluded. During that period, 17,772 families of girls were at risk commit to abandon FGM. (UNICEF) Current reports seem to indicate a decreasing popularity of FGM in Upper Egypt (El-Gibaly). demonstrating that the reform process is slowing