Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of the new testament books
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of the new testament books
In Fee chapter three he starts by explaining what books of the new testament are the Epistles. Also, how we identify what an Epistle is. When we read these Epistles we should follow the six-part form, 1.) name of the writer, 2.) name of the recipient, 3.) greeting, 4.) thanksgiving and prayer, 5.) body, and 6.) final greeting and farewell. When reading these letters, we should keep in mind that they are occasional natured. This means that they were written for an intended purpose and were written in the first century AD. Fee gives tips to refer to a Bible dictionary, read the whole letter in one sitting, jot down observations and notes about the letter, reread the letter, and when reading these letter “THINK PARAGRAPHS”. Fee stresses the importance …show more content…
In Fee Chapter four, He explains that with the Epistles there are multiple disagreements, but most agree on the point that there are limitations of possibilities set by the historical and literary contexts. He also goes in to detail about basic rules such as “a text cannot mean what it never could have meant to its author or readers”, or being aware that there are certain parts in Scripture that can be applied to our times but we must be aware that the Scripture was never written for our ways of life but for first century way of life. Fee breaks down the Epistles into two styles of writing. The styles are 1.) speaking to first century audiences’ issues without any relatable parts for the twenty first century readers, or 2.) the parts that speak to both the first century audiences and can be related back to the twenty first century readers. Fee also wants to stress that we as interpreters to keep in mind the culture relativity, nature of narratives, and the original meaning of these writings. In Fee chapter six he states how to interpret the book of Acts. Fee starts the chapter by explaining that Acts is a historical writing by the gentile Luke during the Hellenistic
It is the reader and his or her interpretive community who attempts to impose a unified reading on a given text. Such readers may, and probably will, claim that the unity they find is in the text, but this claim is only a mask for the creative process actually going on. Even the most carefully designed text can not be unified; only the reader's attempted taming of it. Therefore, an attempt to use seams and shifts in the biblical text to discover its textual precursors is based on a fundamentally faulty assumption that one might recover a stage of the text that lacked such fractures (Carr 23-4).
Scholars of the Pauline writings have divided them into the following categories: (1) those unquestionably by Paul: Romans, I and II Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, I Thessalonians, and Philemon; (2) a letter that was probably written by Paul, but has had serious questions raised about its' authorship: II Thessalonians; (3) letters that were not actually written by Paul but were developed from his thought: Colossians and Ephesians; (4) letters that bear Paul's name but clearly come from another time and different set of circumstances in the church: I and II Timothy and Titus (the so-called Pastoral Letters); (5) a letter not bearing Paul's name and which evidences a wholly different thought and religious vocabulary from that of Paul: the Letter to the Hebrews (Kee, 5th Ed. 224).
The book of Acts is known as 'the birth of the church'. Acts recounts the story of
Morgan, G. Campbell. Studies in the Four Gospels. 3rd ed. Old Tappan: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1931.
Gomes, Peter J. The Good Book: Reading the Bible with Mind and Heart. New York: Morrow, 1996.
Harris, Stephen. Understanding The Bible. 6 ed. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2002. Print.
Campbell, William. Sanger. “The ‘We’ Passages in the Acts of the Apostles: The Narrator as Narrative Character.” Journal of Theological Studies 59, no. 2 (2008): 755-757.
The New Testament is a collection of different spiritual literary works, which includes the Gospels, a history of early church, the epistles of Paul, other epistles and apocalypse. Without deeply thinking or researching of the chronological order of the Gospels, a reader should not have problem to observe that the Gospels begin with the Gospel of Matthew, and to notice that there are many common areas, including content and literary characteristics, among the first three Gospels, the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
The first is an extended benediction or eulogia (1:1-14) and prayer (1:15-23), constituting the framework for a celebration of God’s accomplishments in Christ for His eternal purposes (Bruce, 241). In typical Pauline letters, there is an introduction and then a thanksgiving and prayer section. After that, Paul goes on to deal with the issues that he wants to address. Ephesians has a slightly different pattern. There is an interruption of that flow, an insertion of a berakhah, which is Hebrew word for blessing, is added (1:3-14).
Johnson, S. Lewis. “Studies in the Epistle to the Colossians.” Bibliotheca Sacra 118 (1961): 147.
The Bible Student will have more knowledge of how to interpret God’s Word when finished with the work. Fee and Stuart achieve their goal of helping the reader not only with interpretation, but with application.
Secondly, the imagery used by the sources differs greatly. One example is worth noting: verse 7 in the Tyndale translation speaks of the testing of the faith; whereas The Message uses the imagery of gold to communicate the same idea. What can be deduced from the differences is the interpretive freedom which developed over the history of Bible exegesis.
eality is, that it will probably never go away until Jesus returns, so we must do what Jude tells us, we must guard out faith, and build ourselves up praying in the Holy Spirit. Reading the Word of God, will enable us to oppose false doctrine that is being taught today, because it will make us aware of the truth, the truth that Jude and Peter already had a revelation on. Bibliography • The letter of Jude. • The letter of II Peter. • The Holy Bible, New King James Version, Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1982.
Lea, Thomas D., and David Alan Black. The New Testament Its Background and message. 2nd edition. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2003.
Generally speaking, it is my opinion that the book of Acts presents many helpful instances of concerns and stumbling blocks that