Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social determinants of health in everyday life
Social determinants of health in everyday life
How do social determinants of health contribute to illness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social determinants of health in everyday life
1. Statement of the Problem The way in which one’s health is conducted depends on one’s individual elements. Adding on, perceived stress has been thought to be linked to bad dietary and physical exercise choices. Bandura’s social cognitive theory states that personal behavior has a direct correlation with person, behavior, and environment. Therefore, perceived stress, which arises from the interactions of these things, has the potential to affect food choices, sedentary behavior, physical activities, and the environment. Reciprocal determinism suggests that one’s actions can be influenced by the environment and the people that are occupying the environment. With all of this said, family is the most important factor in one’s social life and …show more content…
Bandura’s theoretical framework expresses that the individual factors of people connect with each other repeatedly over a wide span of time. His notion of a triadic reciprocal determinism can also be applied to the area of family. Direct and indirect influences should be contemplated for the model of family reciprocal determinism. Direct being face to face confrontations between the family members and indirect being just the influence of the environment on a person. Bandura’s social cognitive theory connects stress and health habits on an interpersonal level. 3. Hypothesis The stress of a person has the ability to alter his or her health by means of affecting one’s physical activities, sedentary behavior, and food intake. Also, the stress of one family member may be capable of influencing the health behavior of the remaining family members in the household. 4. Methods or …show more content…
214 families that consisted of two parents and one child were given 3 sets of questionnaires and were told to fill them out separately. There were six things that were being questioned in the questionnaire: perceived stress, chronic stress during childhood, physical activity, sedentary time, food consumption, and education level. Perceived stress was calculated using the 3 subscales of Trierer Inventory for Chronic Stress and it was used to assess parental stress. The subscales used were: work overload (8 items), social overload (6 items), and social tension (6 items). The assessment for stress in children was calculated by using the Chronic Stress during Childhood scale. Three subscales were used: school overload (8 items), social tension (5 items), and lack of time (3 items). All participants rated items on a 5 point Likert scale for perceived stress and chronic childhood stress. Physical activity was shown by the parents recording the number of days that they committed to performing at least 30 minutes of exercise, and for the child 60 minutes. This was recorded both during a normal week and during the last week. A modified version of the “Golden Leisure Time Physical Activity” was used as well. Sedentary time was found by asking parents and children how much of their leisure time was spent on sedentary activities on both weekdays and weekends. A Food Frequency Questionnaire based on a 7 point
In the Unnatural Causes film, UC Berkley Professor and Epidemiologist, Leonard Syme, states that an important component of overall health is the “ability to influence the events that impinge on your life,” or another words, the means by which you are able to effectively manage the stressors in your life will greatly impact your health (2015). It is common knowledge that stress can negatively impact your health and the film points out that chronic stress affects the body by increasing cortisol levels, heart rate, blood pressure, circulating glucose levels and decreases the immune system’s response. All of this increases the risks of diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses (Smith, director, 2015). If we have power, control and
However, the theory might not be applicable to other cultures. Generally, people from different cultural backgrounds have personal coping and social resources that can assist them to avoid negative experiences that affect health status, and to deal with such experiences when they happen. Therefore, most of the psychosocial variables that might impact on the health Westerners may not apply well to those from highly different cultural backgrounds (Fernando, 2010). Another disadvantage of the theory is that it generally focusses on individuals and proximal factors (Sundmacher, Scheller-Kreinsen, & Busse
This model believes that an individual may be free from disease or physical injury however social factors that surrounds a person will determine their wellbeing. In the social dimension of health a person has to be able to interact with people, such as friends and family. According to Antonia C. Lyons and Kerry Chamberlain (2006) Health Psychology a Critical introduction ‘studies have demonstrated an association between what is called social integration and physical health, including mortality rates’. The skill to be able to build healthy relationships may give an individual a positive self-image. Poor social skills may mean that an individual may become isolated or stressed. If an individual becomes stressed and isolated they will be free of disease as they will be physically and mentally fit, however the stress will contribute to the health status of the individual. According to Charles L. Sheridan and Sally A. Radmacher (1992) Health psychology challenging the biomedical model ‘attributes like strength, health and attractiveness can be helpful in coping with
Stress has various effects on the body, both psychological and physiological. Stress can have positive effects on the body and can be beneficial, but frequent stress will eventually cause negative effects on the body.
The purpose of this paper is to define stress and how it effects the body's physiological systems. This paper will include the normal functions and organs involved in the following five physiological systems, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory, immune and musculoskeletal. This paper will also include a description of a chronic illness associated with each physiological system and how the illness is affected by stress.
You can medically be in the best shape possible, but if you are under a lot of stress, your mental health is compromised, which can lead to isolation from others, and now your social health is being neglected. It’s just one big cycle. Focusing on all components of good health such as eating a balanced diet for your physical, finding stress relievers for your mental and spending time with friends and family for social, is taking positive preventive measures to stay healthy. It is not only our responsibility, but a community effort to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to achieve and maintain overall good health.
Despite that many don 't realize the dangers, stress is one of the most significant problems of modern times, causing serious problems on physical and mental health. Stress symptoms may be affecting a patients health, even though a doctor may not realize it. Don 't assume that an illness is to blame for that excruciating headache or your sleep deprivation. Let 's face it, everyone copes with stress. Sometimes stress is in our favor, but other times it could feel like stress is taking over. " Stress is a normal physical response your body uses to protect itself from challenges life throws at it each day"(Stress and Health: How Stress Affects Your Health) Stress affects everyone differently, so it 's important to understand what may be causing
Life is full of frustrations and demands. For millions of individuals stress is a way of life. To a certain point stress can be healthy and beneficial; it can help you perform under pressure, keep you safe from danger and motivate you to do your best. But when stress becomes too overwhelming, it can impact your health, mood and quality of life. If, by understanding how the body’s stress response works, then a person is able to recognize the signs and symptoms of stress, therefore avoiding health problem in the future. Stress can be experienced manly in these three stages of life: Childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Each expresses different levels of stress that impacts health behavior and health outcomes. Throughout this essay, it will explain how results from childhood can lead up chronic stress in socioecomical disadvantage adults, how stress is coped with and how nurses can resolve issues with chronic stress. In the end childhood stress is the root cause of adult disease, both physical and mental.
Stress is defined in the dictionary as “state of mental tension and worry caused by problems in your life”. Everyone encounters stress in their life caused by many different variables in life and we all cope with in different ways. The way one copes with the stress is how it can affect our body. Some take to working out, eating healthy, take breaks from what is stressing you out and getting plenty of sleep which are good ways to cope with it. Some take to other coping mechanisms that are not very great for the body. Some examples are stress eating, abuse of drugs and alcohol, bottling up the stress, and depression. These bad methods can cause serious damage to one’s health on the body.
Psychologists have been interested in the person-environment interaction –environmental factors have been explored and related to individual’s behaviour, many argued that behaviour could be explained and predicted if the fundamental mechanisms, such as environmental influences, were known (Conyne & Clack, 1981). Models have been bias and focused on the negative influences on human behaviour, however, recent models of person-environment interaction delve deeper and attempt to understand whether this interaction can cause positive influences. In this essay, the psychological literature of three models of person-environment will be explored and the differences and possible similarities will be discussed. Firstly, the diathesis-stress model attempts to explain the person-environment interaction; this framework proposes that some individuals are disproportionately likely to be affected adversely by an environmental stressor (e.g., family adversity) due to a “vulnerability” in their composition.
icantly. Eating a balanced diet, exercising and visiting healthy facilities is no longer their duties, overall health is affected gradually. Stress changes the relationship of different acquaintances. Stressed persons tend to live alone thus detaching themselves from their friends, classmate, family, and even lecturers. Students turn to be irritable and defensive.
While summarizing the multi-factorial model, many aspects included there can possibly determine different outcomes of people’s health in relation illness. The model shows how biological, environmental, behavioral, personality and social-cultural factors are imperative in relation to some of the leading causes of stress related illnesses. Most importantly, (Hoover, 2000) notes that genetic and lifestyle factors are among a few that simple answers to why some people can maintain their health, while others become ill.
Member are more likely to develop negative psychological developmental because of the lack to supply these needs. All needs are essential; however, one’s physical (food and shelter) need cause the direst effect. The lack of shelter and food causes malnourishment depriving the body of much need protein for survival in which alter one’s physical and mental development. This cause thin body, underdevelopment (short body), low energy, anemia, or death. Mentally, the rising numbers of behavioral problems among children could suggest that some families are struggling to cope with the increasing stress they are experiencing due to the lack of their basic need. Infants and small children who are exposed to an unhealthy family system and the home experience add emotional stress that can harm to their social development. The effects of a unhealthy family system causes social problems such as withdrawal, loneliness, loss of confidence, school problems, anxiety and depression, and alcohol or drug abuse which could lead to criminal behavior. Exposure to domestic violence in childhood has been linked to a similar set of outcomes, including low self-esteem and social withdrawal overall effecting the emotional
Stress is the combination of psychological, physiological, and behavioral reactions that people have in response to events that threaten or challenge them. Stress can be good or bad. Sometimes, stress is helpful, providing people with the extra energy or alertness they need. Stress could give a runner the edge he or she needs to persevere in a marathon, for example. This good kind of stress is called eustress. Unfortunately, stress is often not helpful and can even be harmful when not managed effectively. Stress could make a salesperson buckle under the pressure while trying to make a sales pitch at an important business meeting, for example. Moreover, stress can increase the risk of developing health problems, such as cardiovascular disease and anxiety disorders. This bad kind of stress is called distress, the kind of stress that people usually are referring to when they use the word stress.
Stress is defined as “any circumstances that threaten or are perceived to threaten one’s well-being and thereby tax one’s coping abilities” (Weiten & Lloyd, 2006, p. 72). Stress is a natural event that exists literally in all areas of one’s life. It can be embedded in the environment, culture, or perception of an event or idea. Stress is a constant burden, and can be detrimental to one’s physical and mental health. However stress can also provide beneficial effects; it can satisfy one’s need for stimulation and challenge, promote personal growth, and can provide an individual with the tools to cope with, and be less affected by tomorrow’s stress (Weiten & Lloyd, 2006, p. 93).