Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Divorce And Conflict Theory
Importance of mediation in conflicts resolution
The role of mediation in conflict resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Divorce And Conflict Theory
1. Assess the ability of the law in resolving conflict and encouraging cooperation during divorce and other aspects of family law.
Prior to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), divorce was dealt with under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1959 (Cth). The notion of divorce and how it was handled was very different when compared to today. Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1959 (Cth) 14 grounds for divorce were outlined and typically, couples wishing for a divorce often despised each other and they blamed one another for the breakdown of the marriage. Through this Act, a couple had to meet the grounds for divorce and wait 5 years to obtain a divorce. However, the introduction to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) in 1975 saw the concept of divorce change, particularly how it was dealt with. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) introduced ‘no fault’ divorce, which meant that
…show more content…
However, compulsory counselling is often unsuccessful as couples dislike being forced to attend. In 2006 the Federal Government established Family Relationship Centres (FRCs) with the aim of assisting couples in the need of counselling and mediation. The introduction of these centres highlights how the government and the law are cooperating to ensure the resolution of conflict and encouragement of cooperation during divorce are addressed successfully. The statistic that 95% of divorces are settled out of court emphasises the fact that the law is doing its utmost to ensure that couples cooperate together, idealistically, out of the court system as court procedures are adversarial and parties often return to court to argue issues that emerge after the divorce, and nonetheless, court processes are very expensive. So with the establishment of FRCs we see the cooperation of couples as they have to divide property on their own and the resolution of conflict as they talk about their issues, instead of arguing about them in
The controversy, however, lies in the argument from critics that restricting couples from marriage or imposing fines or penalties is unjust. Jennifer Daw, a therapist with the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy quoted an article from USA Today wherein opponents argued that, “divorce regulations or restrictions would create messier divorces, not prevent them and tougher restrictions on divorce could endanger women in abusive marriages.” People were once required to negotiate in divorce. The “No Fault Divorce” has changed that and takes the ground...
In this day and age there are many variations of what constitutes a couple or family in comparison to many years ago. Long ago the idea of a ‘nuclear family’ was considered the norm; it consisted of the conventional husband, wife and children . But as our society progressed through the years this definition became less conventional and criticisms were made, this definition of ‘family’ did not account for gay unions, soul parents nor did it acknowledge the prevalence of extended family. The definition of family has changed over time, as have the socially defined roles of mothers and fathers. Within these varied family units, situations occur in which divorces and separations take place and a lot of the times these tricky situations may involve children, which can make an already tricky situation even more problematic. There are pieces of legislation which are in place which aim to protect the best interests of a child during the time their parents are going through divorce but sometimes these avenues can be more problematic and ultimately destroy unions whereas other avenues of dispute resolution such as mediation, albeit with its own criticisms, helps to keep relationships afoot in that it provides an opportunity for peaceful and mutual agreements to be made in a more laid back environment.
Introduction A century ago, divorce was nearly non-existent due to the cultural and religious pressures placed upon married couples. Though over time Canadians have generally become more tolerant of what was once considered ‘mortal sin’, marital separation and divorce still remain very taboo topics in society. Political leaders are frowned upon when their marriages’ crumble, religions isolate and shun those who break their martial vows, and people continue to look down on those who proceed to legally separate their households. With that being said, couples do not just decide to get a divorce for no particular reason. There must be something driving them towards marital dissatisfaction and further, driving them towards divorce.
This essay will first address the statute used and interpretation of the threshold test by the courts, and then focus on cases involving vulnerable children to assess whether the statute in The Children Act 1989 is sufficient in protecting these children from harm. I will look at the argument in favour of the current approach taken by the courts, and the counter-argument in favour of changing the current approach. The arguments are delicately balanced and the law is always developing, so it will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court resolves this issue in future.
According to Rodgers (1995) no-fault divorce was implemented to make divorce less restrictive, and more importantly removes the factor of fault in that it removes the need for one party to be guilty or innocent. No-fault divorce law recognises that a breakdown of the relationship between spouses can result in them no longer being able to function as a married couple, and instead seeks to reduce the legal obstacles, economic costs, and psychological consequences of divorce (Rodgers 1995). Due to these factors, divorce may have become more accessible to low income families had who previously been unable to afford it under fault-based divorce. On the other hand, no-fault divorce may have become more attractive to high income families in particular the “guilty” spouse who under fault-based legislation faced alimony payments, child support payments and loss of property to the “innocent” spouse (Rodgers 1995). The role that the no-fault law plays in divorce is that of a societal structure, in that it encompasses an association between individuals and the social institution that is the American legal system on a sizable scale throughout American society.
Gottman (1999) conveys that the integration of active listening and conflict resolution techniques is not sufficient to safeguard marriages from a probable divorce. Due to that couples who develop throughout the years a high level of
Divorce is and has become a major issue in our society, the reason for that has been attributed to the drastic increase in divorce rates over the years. Divorce often disrupts the flow of the family structure, increases discord, and affects how family issues are handled. Families dealing with divorce are often times in a state of complete confusion and disorder, and filled with frustration, anger, and pain. Power struggles between spouses, which often times spread to the children if there any increase as the addiction worsens. There is a growing concernment among those in different fields like Social Work, Academia, and Mental Health in the United States, other countries, who have taken an interest in how divorce is readjusting
From this example, we can say that often couples are frustrated with their immediate disappointments and want to take divorce. However, in their immediacy, they can’t see or remember a long term effect of their decision. In this research paper, I wanted to raise three questions about family divorce and answer them in order they are raised.
During the 1800s, more specifically in 1841-1968, getting a divorce were taken by following a series of steps called the Acts of Divorce. To get a divorce, you need to put a notice of intent to petition the government for a divorce and be put in two newspapers in your area. The whole process would be held, at least, 6 months. The picture on the left is a copy of a couple, John and Mary Ann Monteith’s divorce paper. The husband, which was the petitioner, wanted the divorce because of his wife’s adultery, who she committed, with William G. Norton. Their divorce actually, was on the 23rd of June, 1887 in the district of Parry Sound
Zimiles, H. (2004). Schismatic studies of divorce: Essay reviews of for better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered by e.m. hetherington and j. kelly and of the unexpected legacy of divorce by j.s. wallerstein, j.m. lewis and s. blakesfee. Human development, 47(4), 239-250.
Currently the divorce law in England and Wales operates a fault-based system whereby the court grants a divorce if a person can prove that their marriage has broken down. The break down in the marriage can only be due to one of the following five reasons – adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion after two years, two years' separation with consent or five years' separation without consent. These requirements were established in the case of Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365.
Divorce is a growing epidemic in Canada and the United States. It affects both parties involved, being the spouses, and also has a profound affect on children of the marriage. Recently our government has been revising the old divorce act. It was apparent that it was time to revise the act because it did not properly protect the children from being caught in the middle of things.
divorce much easier than before, without having to prove adultery or violence. The Matrimonial Family Proceedings Act of 1985 is also another new law which affected the rate of divorce, this allowed. people to get divorced after being married for only one year, whereas before in 1985 married couples had to wait at least three years before they could get divorced. This act increased divorces as people split up. at a faster rate if they had problems in their relationship and didn’t.
Mediation is a form of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Mediation is a process which it assists disputed parties to arrive to a mutually agreed resolution without going to court. As the out of court problem solving approach, mediation is a more convenient way for parties which trying to avoid the hassle and loving some flexibility from the more rigid court procedure. Mediation can be said as an informal process of which parties during this process is encouraged to work together among the disputed parties in good faith in order to solve their problems and disputes at a lower financial cost and it consume lesser time as opposed to the court procedure. Mediation recently has become more common as one of dispute resolution process especially for disputes which have relations to divorce matter, child custody or even for child visitation especially for its privacy and confidentiality.
From the past to present, people all over the world have determined to live together, which is called “get marriage” in another word, so that they depend on for living each other. Nevertheless, some couples are unable to maintain their relationship; therefore they choose divorce, which is one of the solutions to cope with problems between husband and wife. Furthermore, most people think carefully before they get marriage. However, the divorce rates trend to continually increase nowadays, thus it might be argued that divorces can be taken place easier than the past. There are three main causes of divorce: changing woman’s roles, stress in modern living and lack of communication, which are highlighted below.