Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Norms of Jane Austen's Society
Persuasion jane austen
Persuasion jane austen
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Norms of Jane Austen's Society
In Persuasion by Jane Austen, Austen comments on the dynamics of friends and family. During Austen’s time, one’s family was their most influential connection. A person’s family determined their class, and therefore, supposedly, their happiness and ability to succeed. Someone in a high ranking family was considered fortunate solely because they were part of the elite group of society. Austen however, sees folly in this way of thinking and creates a character named Anne. Anne has almost every advantage in society. Her father is a baron and owns a beautiful estate. Society saw Anne as in the perfect spot to reach an ultimate, coveted societal position. She was expected to marry well and only associate with those who would be deemed good connections. …show more content…
However, Anne was mistreated by her family and their acquaintances. Austen saw the absurdity in the expectation for Anne to associate with these people and made a bold claim: people should create their own family out of people who they love and are loved by, not out of those who only offer social benefits. She makes this claim by having Anne form a new family out of her friends who truly love her, challenging how society viewed family and friends. In Anne’s new family Lady Russell is her mother figure, and although Lady Russell is in a high class, Anne chooses her because she loves her, not because of Lady Russell’s social rank. Anne and Lady Russell’s mutual affection drives their friendship. Lady Russell sees Anne as a “most dear and highly valued god-daughter, favourite, and friend…it was only in Anne that she could fancy the mother to revive again” (11). Anne’s reasons for having Lady Russell as part of her family goes deeper than what society believed was necessary. Sir Walter, and society at large, saw Lady Russell as a good connection, and nothing more. Lady Russell’s good intentions and love for Anne and her family were only recognized by Anne. Her family saw the relationship as purely economic. Even with Lady Russell’s faults, Anne “[thought] with heightened gratitude of the extraordinary blessing of having one such truly sympathising friend as Lady Russell” (39). Anne chooses Lady Russell as her mother figure because of Lady Russell’s affection and constant friendship. Anne’s refusal to prioritize her cousins the Dalyrmples, over her other relationships shows her disregard for class, and that her concern is making her family be people who love her. The Dalyrmples are the wealthy cousins of the Elliots. However, wealth and nobility are the only thing Dowager Viscountess Dalrymple and her daughter Miss Carteret have. They have “no superiority of manner, accomplishment, or understanding. Lady Dalrymple had acquired the name of a ‘charming woman,’ because she had a smile and a civil answer for every body. Miss Cateret [her daughter] with still less to say, was so plain and so awkward…” (122). Despite the Dalyrmples inability to be good company or truly love their cousins, Sir Walter and Elizabeth hold them in high esteem. Their high rank outweighs any character flaws in Sir Walter’s mind. Anne however, refuses to become infatuated with the Dalyrmples, and makes every excuse to not have to see them. Lady Russell tries to express to Anne that, “family connexions were always worth preserving…” But to Anne, the connections worth preserving are the family she makes out of her friends. Anne’s priorities are to spend time with people who have a good heart, rather than just a good social standing While the Dalyrmples would have been seen as good connections to have, Anne spends her time deepening her friendship with Mrs.
Smith, who was not considered a profitable connection, because of Mrs. Smith sweet manner and good companionship. Mrs. Smith was Anne’s old school teacher. She was once “fine looking, well grown...in all the glow of health and confidence of superiority” (124). However Mrs. Smith is now widowed, poor, and crippled. Anne’s association with Mrs. Smith is detestable to Sir Walter. He can see no advantage in the connection. He says to Anne, “A widow Mrs. Smith…and what is her attraction? That she is old and sickly. ‒ Upon my word Anne Elliot you have the most extraordinary taste! Everything that revolts other people, low company, paltry rooms, foul air, disgusting associations are inviting to you” (128). Sir Walter’s disdain for Anne and Mrs. Smith friendship highlights how much Anne focuses on people’s character rather than their situations in life. Anne chooses Mrs. Smith to be a part of her family because she has “good sense and agreeable manners which [Anne] had almost ventured to depend on, and a disposition to converse and be cheerful beyond her expectations. Neither the dissipations of the past…nor the restrictions of the present; neither sickness nor sorrow seemed to have closed her heart or ruined her spirits” (125). Anne chooses to visit Mrs. Smith over the noble Dalrymples, despite Mrs. Smith’s inability to give Anne any advantage in the social
realm. Captain Wentworth is the most important person Anne chooses to make part of her family, and her decision shows how she is concerned with her own happiness not social advantages. Anne had two main options for a husband in the novel: Mr. Elliot and Captain Wentworth, who both propose to her. Mr. Elliot is Anne’s cousin, and Anne’s home is entailed to him. If Anne chose Mr. Elliot to be part of her family, she would have many advantages. Along with gaining wealth, Anne could keep her last name and become the mistress of her household. Despite Mr. Elliot’s somewhat genuine affection for Anne, Anne does not love him. Anne knows she would be unhappy being married to him despite the other advantages his proposal offered. Captain Wentworth also proposes to Anne. While a marriage to Wentworth would not be disadvantageous, as he is wealthy, it would not be the more beneficial of the two offers. Mr. Elliot is higher up in society than Wentworth, and he stands to inherit Anne’s home. While Mr. Elliot would be the obvious choice to include in Anne’s family, Wentworth has something Mr. Elliot does not. Wentworth loves Anne. Anne and Wentworth’s mutual love, is enough to persuade Anne to choose Wentworth to include in her family, instead of Mr. Elliot. While her choice was not necessarily bad, it would not have been considered the best decision between the two men. Lady Russell was one who recognized this was not the most beneficial decision Anne could make. She “must be suffering some pain in understanding and relinquishing Mr. Elliot, and be making some struggles to become acquainted with, and do justice to Captain Wentworth” (200). Anne does not care that her marriage may not have been the most advantageous choice. She is happy to choose Wentworth as her husband. His genuine, deep love for her makes him worthy of being accepted into Anne’s family. Today, like in the Regency Era, people strive to make connections that offer social advantages, but Anne shows having a family of people who are loving and kind is more important than having good connections. Anne chooses to have deep, meaningful relationships, rather than superficial ones, even though her friendships may not be able to offer her any external benefit. Anne makes these friends part of her family, even though her immediate family offered her a higher place in society. This message transcends time and speaks to people today. People still make their family out of those who can offer the most to them. Austen writes Persuasion to illustrate the importance of making a family who is loving and encouraging. True happiness will not come from surrounding oneself with people who do not really love them. The only way Anne achieved happiness, and the only way anyone can achieve happiness, is to surround oneself with people who really love and appreciate them.
Lawrence’s “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” is pervaded by the idea that relationships between classes are highly influenced negatively by society. Connie is having this very sexual and passionate relationship with her gamekeeper Oliver Mellors who is of a lower status to her. To many reader’s surprise, Mellors is a man who, as one critic quotes, “remains impervious to the pettiness and conventional society” suggesting this to be a reason for Connie and Mellors relationship to be so strong compared to that of, for instance, Othello and Desdemona and Daisy, Tom and Gatsby’s relationships. In Shakespeare’s “Othello”, Desdemona and Othello’s relationships are highly influenced by others and the people around them. This influence eventually leads to death with society still intact. In “The Great Gatsby”, Fitzgerald uses the strong symbolic image of money and American society to show how people can get carried away and lose touch with the reality of relationships. Daisy is surrounded by a society she doesn’t like living with Tom and she is unable to get away from it, while Tom has another women that he is hiding. The idea of hiding is also suggesting that the society doesn’t see it as a correct thing to do, yet Fitzgerald appears to go against this. Another theme of “The Great Gatsby” is the idea of new and old money and how that affects who society thinks you should be with. Society in all...
Thesis: The allure of the New Age can be attributed in part to an overall lack of understanding its nature; when its history is taken into consideration and its persuasive element is exposed, we see that, contrary to the assumption that the New Age is a freer alternative to mainstream religion, persuasion is a very present part of the New Age.
Lily Bart and her mother have been socially "ruined" in a sense because of the economic failures of their father and husband respectfully. However, Lily's mother teaches her that she can still maintain a high social status if she marries well, i.e. a rich man. In fact, Lily's mother is known for making the most out of the least as she is "famous for the unlimited effect she produced on limited means" (Wharton 48). In a society where women are considered valuable only for the appearance they present, it is impossible f...
In Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre there are many occasions in which there is motifs about division and bias relations. Money was a major division between people in the Victorian Era. Family made people rise in the standings with others, If your family was rich or well known, then you were going to be well known and well liked. There are many situations in which Jane is thought of as poor and worthless, as well as having no family.
It is not only widowers taking care of their daughters, in Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maud Montgomery, Matthew is a father-like figure. The family is definitely unconventional with siblings, Matthew and Marilla, raising an orphan girl, but the two adults do still have their own impact on Anne that affects her childhood. Matthew is set up to be the mild mannered sibling from the beginning; all social interaction making him feel out of place (Montgomery 4). He is the quiet one in the house, who does not have much space to express many words. His sister is the ruler of the household; her’s is the final word. Matthew often is the one to nudge her into being more flexible. It was through his quiet, non-confrontational personality that he was able
Society has changed a lot in the last couple of decades, though, at the time set in the play Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, the stereotype was very much alive. Even today echoes of this archaic family model still exist. Being normal, and adapting to society, can often lead a person to feel a sense of belonging in the short term. However, the penalty for conforming is that the individual can be lost. Giving up your personal goals, in the pursuit of those passed down from your family can lead to a lifetime of regrets. Basing decisions on societal norms can also have devastating consequences, leading the individual to become lost in a mundane life that is not of their choosing. Martha and George created a fictional son for their private needs to take away from the failure they felt as married individuals by not being able to conceive a child. Nick and Honey started their marriage to fill their roles as future parents in the expected family dynamic. Confronting each couple is a personal failure resulting in an unrealized future. Neither couple has a desire to admit their shortcomings for fear of judgment from the other couple. The play, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? displays how the desire to be normal and successful, in the eyes of our peers, impacts our life
...an only find true happiness in marriage with someone who shares similar manners and treasure people’s qualities over their look and status. This is when Anne’s sensibility allows her to disregard her family’s persuasion and become determined to fulfill her love with Wentworth.
Anna and Elizabeth both come from humble beginnings; however, Elizabeth marries for love, while Anna desires to marry solely for financial need. Elizabeth rues her decision to decline Darcy’s proposal once she becomes cognizant of her love for him. Elizabeth contemplates, "A man who has once been refused! How could I ever be foolish enough to expect a renewal of his love? Is there one among the sex, who would not protest against such a weakness as a second proposal to the same woman? There is no indignity so abhorrent to their feelings!" (Austen 308). Elizabeth progresses as a character as she is no longer naive to her feelings for Darcy and is wishful for another proposal. Austen emphasizes that love supersedes one’s need for social status as Elizabeth only accepts Darcy’s proposal once she genuinely knows she is in love and, as a result, lives a fulfilled life. Anna is the antithesis of Elizabeth as when she visits her family after her marriage, “Her father and the boys [look] at her in a peculiar way, as though just before she came in they had been blaming her for having married for money a tedious, wearisome man she [does] not love; her rustling skirts, her bracelets, and her general air of a married lady, [offends] them and [makes] them uncomfortable” (Chekhov 3). Anna parades her ostentatious new life, reminding her family of her fortune. Despite Anna’s apparent
Over the centuries, women’s duties and roles in the home and in the workforce have arguably changed for the better. In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen teaches the reader about reputation and love in the nineteenth and twenty-first centuries by showing how Elizabeth shows up in a muddy dress, declines a marriage proposal and how women have changed over time. Anything a woman does reflects on her future and how other people look at her. When Elizabeth shows up to the Bingley’s in a muddy dress, they categorize her as being low class and unfashionable. Charles Bingley, a rich attractive man, and his sister had a reputation to protect by not letting their brother marry a ‘low class girl’.
Within the novel, Jane Austen’s exploits of irony are shown linked throughout Emma’s notions of love and the real within her own society. Emma’s lack of education on the concepts of love is quite evident within her apathy towards Frank Churchill as her opinions are deeply rooted within her own affections, as she states, “Emma continued to entertain no doubt of her being in love. Her ideas only varied as to the how much. At first, she thought it was a good deal; and afterwards, but little. She had great pleasure in hearing Frank Churchill talked of; and for his sake, greater pleasure than ever in seeing Mr. and Mrs. Weston; she was very often thinking of him. But, on the other hand, she could not admit herself to be unhappy, nor, after the first morning, to be less disposed for employment than usual; she was still busy and cheerful; and, pleasing as he was, she could yet imagine him to have faults,” (Austen 264). Emma’s sketch of Harriet is another illustration of irony surrounded by Emma’s arrogance as it does not portray an accurate depiction of Harriet as Emma has altered ...
In Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility there is a theme that runs along with males in the novel. The first born sons are forced to deal with the promotions and abilities that come along with the laws of primogeniture, yet even with all they get they do not lead an altogether happy life. The men that are "first-born" are in fact too swayed by the power and obligation that comes with their estates. In the novel the first sons are viewed in a negative light, yet the second-born sons have less responsibility to be what society wants them to be and are allowed to be his own. Although Edward Ferrars, is a firstborn, his mother disinherits him because of his lack of focus and ability to be all she wants him to be; as John Dashwood remarks "Robert will now to all intents and purposes be considered as the eldest son." We know that Colonel Brandon is a second son because he has an older brother who married his old sweetheart, Eliza, many years before the novel's plot begins. And whereas these characters are the heroes of the novel, all the eldest sons are cast in a negative light, including John Dashwood, Robert Ferrars, and Colonel Brandon's older brother. In Austen's day, the eldest sons were the ones who inherited all the family property according to the laws of male primogeniture. However, in spite of these inheritance laws, it is the second sons who ultimately find happiness in the novel; thus they make content lives for them...
Austen writes of the small gentry, the rural elite, and in considering this question, it is crucial to have an understanding of the prevailing social distinctions, the expectations for women of this class and the limited options available to them, as well as the inheritance laws of the time.
Jane Austen’s works are characterized by their classic portrayals of love among the gentry of England. Most of Austen’s novels use the lens of romance in order to provide social commentary through both realism and irony. Austen’s first published bookThe central conflicts in both of Jane Austen’s novels Emma and Persuasion are founded on the structure of class systems and the ensuing societal differences between the gentry and the proletariat. Although Emma and Persuasion were written only a year apart, Austen’s treatment of social class systems differs greatly between the two novels, thus allowing us to trace the development of her beliefs regarding the gentry and their role in society through the analysis of Austen’s differing treatment of class systems in the Emma and Persuasion. The society depicted in Emma is based on a far more rigid social structure than that of the naval society of Persuasion, which Austen embodies through her strikingly different female protagonists, Emma Woodhouse and Anne Eliot, and their respective conflicts. In her final novel, Persuasion, Austen explores the emerging idea of a meritocracy through her portrayal of the male protagonist, Captain Wentworth. The evolution from a traditional aristocracy-based society in Emma to that of a contemporary meritocracy-based society in Persuasion embodies Austen’s own development and illustrates her subversion of almost all the social attitudes and institutions that were central to her initial novels.
The world - a rat trap. A rat trap, is what one would define as a simple instrument designed to trap mice with the use of bait. The world, as one may see it, can be defined as an elaborate rat trap: all the luxuries, privileges, resources - baits - offered by the world lure those foolish enough to possess materialistic life goals. In “Jon”, one of the short stories in George Saunders’ In Persuasion Nation, “the facility” (Saunders, 23) represents the world which provides “the Assessors” (Saunders, 48) with resources including food, clothing, shelter, fame; everything an individual would need to live a comfortable life. The Assessors, including Jon, hold their materialistic goals of comfort, basic amenities, and personal and social recognition
Jane Austen is very clear in her writing about class distinction and she uses the novel to look beyond the widely stratified community divided by social classes experienced in the 18th century in England. This distinction shows that class snootiness is simply but an illusion rather than a real obstruction to marriage, given that Elizabeth, though socially inferior to Darcy, she is not in any way academically inferior to him. In this sense, Darcy realizes that his class pretentiousness is mislaid toward Elizabeth, since she also finds out that her prejudice towards Darcy’s snobbish and superior manner is misplaced when he rescues Elizabeth’s family from a scandal and disgrace. In this context, the writer uses Darcy and Elizabeth to show that class distinction does not guarantee one’s happiness in life, neither does it allow him or her to own every good thing desired. For instance, Darcy is brought out as a haughty character, who initially fails to think that Elizabeth is worth him for she originates from an unrecognized family; a middle class girl not so beautiful enough to suit him. However, as the...