Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The theme of social class in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Delicacy of Marriage
Marriage is a powerful union between two people who vow under oath to love each other for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health. This sacred bond is a complicated union; one that can culminate in absolute joy or in utter disarray. One factor that can differentiate between a journey of harmony or calamity is one’s motives. Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is a novel of manners, where Elizabeth Bennet and her aristocratic suitor Mr. Darcy’s love unfolds as her prejudice and his pride abate. Anton Chekhov’s “Anna on the Neck” explores class distinction, as an impecunious young woman marries a wealthy man. Both Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and Anton Chekhov’s “Anna on the Neck” utilize
…show more content…
Financial freedom fascinates Anna and, as soon as she realizes she has access to lucre, she gains a sense of entitlement where she no longer treats her family or husband the same. Anna feels superior and empowered as she ultimately surrenders to the psychological effects of wealth. Furthermore, Austen and Chekhov use symbols to illustrate their characters’ marital developments as Austen discloses Elizabeth’s enlightened nature, while Chekhov highlights Anna’s corrupt fantasy. Throughout Pride and Prejudice, Austen employs Pemberley, Darcy’s estate, as a symbol of Elizabeth and Darcy’s growing love. Austen describes the estate as “a large, handsome stone building, standing well on rising ground, and backed by a ridge of high woody hills; and in front, a stream of some natural importance [swells] into greater, but without any artificial appearance. Its banks [are] neither formal nor falsely adorned” (Austen 225). As Elizabeth visits Pemberley, her feelings for Darcy intensify. Darcy, like Austen’s description of his estate, is a pompous man, whose hubris overpowers his natural eminence. However, this excessive pride coincides with his genuine nature. Elizabeth increasingly grows fonder of …show more content…
Anna and Elizabeth both come from humble beginnings; however, Elizabeth marries for love, while Anna desires to marry solely for financial need. Elizabeth rues her decision to decline Darcy’s proposal once she becomes cognizant of her love for him. Elizabeth contemplates, "A man who has once been refused! How could I ever be foolish enough to expect a renewal of his love? Is there one among the sex, who would not protest against such a weakness as a second proposal to the same woman? There is no indignity so abhorrent to their feelings!" (Austen 308). Elizabeth progresses as a character as she is no longer naive to her feelings for Darcy and is wishful for another proposal. Austen emphasizes that love supersedes one’s need for social status as Elizabeth only accepts Darcy’s proposal once she genuinely knows she is in love and, as a result, lives a fulfilled life. Anna is the antithesis of Elizabeth as when she visits her family after her marriage, “Her father and the boys [look] at her in a peculiar way, as though just before she came in they had been blaming her for having married for money a tedious, wearisome man she [does] not love; her rustling skirts, her bracelets, and her general air of a married lady, [offends] them and [makes] them uncomfortable” (Chekhov 3). Anna parades her ostentatious new life, reminding her family of her fortune. Despite Anna’s apparent
Elizabeth's strength of character is emphasized by its contrast with the weak, naive acceptance of Jane's, the instability and excess of Mrs. Bennet's and the blind, weak-willed following of Kitty's. Her strength is also shown in her rejections of the proposals of Mr. Collins and Darcy. Unlike her mother, she does not base her choice of lovers on the financial security they will give her, and has the strength to reject them. This is especially evident in her rejection of Darcy's initial proposal, when she displays a passionate strength in her anger due to her belief that he has willfully prevented Jane and Bingley's marriage and wronged Wickham by refusing to grant him the property that the old Mr. Darcy bequeathed him. In both cases, the suitor is self-assured that his suit will be accepted, and as a result Elizabeth's rejections are amplified by the size of the blows that their egos receive. In Rosings, she does not let Lady Catherine tyrannize her as "the mere satellites of money and rank, she thought she could witness without trepidation." The Lucases and Collinses are submissive to Lady Catherine, with Maria being "frightened almost out of her senses", and it is probable that society as a whole behaves likewise, as Elizabeth suspects she is "the first creature who had ever dared to trifle with such dignified impertinence". She is again presented as a rebel against ideas of class when Lady Catherine pays a visit to her to ensure that ...
Poet Anne Bradstreet highlights her feelings of love and overall affection towards her husband in her 16th century poem, “To My Dear and Loving Husband” (425). Set during a time were marriage was nothing more than convenience and politics, Bradstreet’s poem gives great insight into how the concept of love was prevalent even during a time were it was never the main motive for marriage. Looking into Bradstreet’s life, she had every reason to have ill will towards her husband and the concept of marriage, as she led a very arduous life typical of a 16th century woman. She nevertheless divulges her feelings and emotions into a beautiful love poem to her husband emphasizing every detail, as to why she loves him and could never be happier by his side (Bradstreet 425). These feelings and concepts of love in a marriage although uncommon in the past, have matured and evolved into a standard perception for marriage today. Many married individuals or those in the process of getting married can greatly relate to Bradstreet’s affection towards her significant other, “I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold, Or all the riches that the East doth hold.”
This truth is the major breaking point for Elizabeth. She couldn't believe that Mr. Darcy would pay such expenses for a lower-class family and for a friend he very much hated. Elizabeth now knows that Mr. Darcy is a truly kind man and here prejudice against him is completely evaporated. She recognizes that she actually loved him very much and if he proposes to her, again, she would accept. Ultimately, he does propose again, and she accepts. The theme is now complete, to never judge an entire person when you only known them
To begin, Mr. and Mrs. Bennet have a love of simple infatuation. This type of love is one without intimacy or commitment, and lies with pure passion. After the passion runs out, no love is left. Mr. Bennet married his wife because she had ample beauty, however, she exposed herself as unintelligent. He often warned his children not to do the same, just as he says to Elizabeth: "My child, let me not have the grief of seeing you unable to respect your partner in life. You know not what you are about" (Austen). The lack of love between her parents was quite obvious to Elizabeth as well. She saw that "her father, captivated by youth and beauty, and that appearance of good humour which youth and beauty generally give, had married a woman whose weak understanding and illiberal mind had very early in...
Midway through Pride and Prejudice, Elizabeth Bennet arrives at a moment of self-awakening which, notably, results from the influence of someone else: Fitzwilliam Darcy. For critic Susan Fraiman, this complication amounts to no less than, as she titles her article, "The Humiliation of Elizabeth Bennet." From this moment forward, according to Fraiman, Elizabeth Bennet ceases to think for herself. She submits to Darcy as to a second father, relinquishes her trust in her own judgments, and thereby suffers a "loss of clout."1 This pivotal moment comes because, after Elizabeth has rejected his proposal, Darcy justifies himself in a lengthy letter. It is true that Darcy claims that he has not, as Elizabeth has charged, separated Elizabeth's sister Jane from Jane's suitor, Mr. Bingley, "regardless of the sentiments of either" (127); neither has he inappropriately cut off Wickham, his childhood companion and son of his late father's steward, from a promised career as a clergyman.2 Darcy's version of events challenges the talent in which Elizabeth prides herself most: her ability to judge character. Yet Fraiman maintains that "Darcy's letter saps [Elizabeth's] power to comprehend": that is, that Darcy's logic undermines Elizabeth's own and, furthermore, that Darcy designs his letter to "inflict" pain on Elizabeth. By allowing Darcy's logic to supercede her own, and receiving with "enthusiasm" the pain that he inflicts, Elizabeth accepts this "humiliation."3 Although Elizabeth comes to agree that Darcy's previous actions were indeed justified, Fraiman incorrectly assumes that this transformation "disables" Elizabeth's capacity to arr...
In Austen’s time, the inability to see past wealth when considering marriage is a cultural tie to the era and its norms. It’s a pitiable and vain cultural upbringing that is frowned upon in this century. One does not simply marry for the sake of wealth and reputation. Without love, marriage cannot last. It ends in a deadlock, or with two people living together but leading separate lives behind closed doors.
Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is well-noted for its ability to question social norms. Most importantly, Austen explores the institution of marriage, as it was in her time, a time where many married for security rather than love. Her characters Elizabeth and Charlotte are renowned even more for their outspoken nature and different views on marriage. Though both Elizabeth and Charlotte yearn for a happy marriage, Charlotte has a more pragmatic and mundane approach while Elizabeth is more romantic and daring with her actions. Through the romantic involvements of both Elizabeth and Charlotte, Austen shows that happiness in marriage is not entirely a matter of chance, but is instead contingent on an accurate evaluation of self and others Elizabeth’s view on Jane and Bingely’s relationship is more hopeful, while Charlotte possesses a more aggressive view.
Throughout Volume II it becomes evident that Elizabeth’s prejudice hinder’s her perspective of other people and their actions. Consider Mr. Collins proposal to Charlotte Lucas. When she first is informed of this she is shocked. Elizabeth is concerned that she is marrying for financial reasons, rather than for love. Elizabeth’s beliefs clash with Charlotte 's notion of marriage. Charlotte wants to marry for practical reasons and for security. She is in her late 20s and she is not the most beauteous. Charlotte reasons that she isn’t going to be getting any better offer soon. Despite so, Elizabeth is ascertain that “ they would never be happy together,” and that “the match might be broken off” (Austin 117). As the plot progresses and they marry, Elizabeth, Maria and Sir William visit Charlotte and Lady Catherine at Hunsford, and to Elizabeth’s surprise, she appears to be content with her living arrangement. Elizabeth even affirms that “her friend had an excellent reason for what she did” (Austen 152). Elizabeth decisively came to understand that Charlotte lives in comfort. Charlotte is surrounded by beautiful scenery and and she enjoys the solitude. She verified that Charlotte has a good relation when Mr. Collins. When Mr. Collins is abutting and/or saying something ridiculous, Charlotte simply ignores him, avoiding discord. Elizabeth undergoes a lot of character development after realizing her faults. Jane Austen’s purpose of this was to criticize the ways that Pride hampers a person’s disposition. In a similar fashion, Darcy’s Pride impedes his character. Mr. Darcy’s persona in Pride and Prejudice, by many might be described as arrogant and as unagreeable, that is because Darcy is very curt and often petulant around others, especially around those of a lesser social placement than his, stated in chapter
The story of Pride and Prejudice starts with a ball, this is the first time that Elizabeth and Jane met Mr. Darcy and Mr. Bingley . While Jane and Mr. Bingley immediately began to take a liking to each other, Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy certainly did not enjoy each others company, as upon their first meeting, Mr. Darcy had gravely insulted her with comments about her looks and also by not asking her to dance. Over the course of the next few meetings, Elizabeth,s hatred of Mr. Darcy grew until she could not see past her hatred of Darcy to any of his good qualities or his personality. A few weeks after these happening Jane Caught a sickness from riding to Mr. Bingley 's estate in the rain. There She stayed for weeks with poor health. Elizabeth came to stay with her during this time to bring her comfort.while staying with Jane at Mr. Bingley 's, Elizabeth spent more time with Mr. Darcy and the rest of the inhabitants at the house. During the time Elizabeth was there, Mr. Darcy was slowly growing fond of Elizabeth 's good humor and charm, even though her opinion was not changed and she still thought of him in disgust. Upon returning home, Jane and Elizabeth discover that their cousin,Mr. Collins, who is the potential heir
The socioeconomic status of a man determines his eligibility in eighteenth century English society rather than his character. In Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, the protagonist, Elizabeth Bennet, searches for love in a society concerned solely on the financial and social aspects of marriage. Conflicts arise when Elizabeth encounters the proud, Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy as she develops strong complex emotions towards him. When Lydia, Elizabeth’s youngest sister, weds the captivating Mr. Wickham, Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth 's relationship further complicates. Through comparing the second eldest and the youngest Bennet daughters, Lydia’s childish qualities foil Elizabeth 's mature sensibility.
The reader is first acquainted with Mr. Darcy's arrogance at the Meryton Ball. Speaking of Elizabeth Bennet, he so snobbishly says that she was, " tolerable, but not handsome enough to tempt me" (Austen 9). His feelings of superiority to the people of the town lend Mr. Darcy to be judged as a man with a repulsive and cruel personality. The women, who had found him dashingly attractive at first glance, deemed him a man unworthy of marriage because he offered no positive qualities other than wealth. Not only did Darcy refuse to dance with Elizabeth, but he makes it clear that no woman in the room was worthy or met his standards of a suitable partner stating that, " there is not another woman in this room, whom it would not be a punishment to me to stand up with" (Austen 8). In the beginning of the novel, Mr. Darcy is only concerned with the wealth and social standing of the people in the town. Because of their lesser social rank, he feels they are un-deserving of his presence and refuses to communicate with them. As the novel progressed, however, Darcy became more and more accepting of the Bennet family. Growing most fond of Elizabeth Bennet, the straightforward, clever daughter, he finally breaks and confesses his true feelings of love for her. "In vain...
Elizabeth is a romantic, and wants to find a man worthy of her love. On the other hand, Charlotte believes “happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of chance.” Elizabeth laughs at her friend, and replies, “You know it is not sound, and that you would never act in this way yourself” (24). However, Charlotte soon enters into a marriage that offers her a good home and security, but a repulsive husband. With these two characters, Austen illustrates the two kinds of marriages most common in the novel: Charlotte’s is an example of a secure, if not pleasant, marriage arrangement. Elizabeth eventually marries Darcy out of genuine love for him, not for want of money or prospects. Unfortunately, others still see the marriage between Darcy and Elizabeth as
In Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen shows examples of how most marriages were not always for love but more as a formal agreement arranged by the two families. Marriage was seen a holy matrimony for two people but living happil...
Austen's view of true love is clearly evident in the relationship between Darcy and Elizabeth. Elizabeth Bennet is an unfailingly attractive character, but what everybody notices about her is her spirited wit and good sense. She has a keen, critical mind when expressing her opinions and is unwilling to believe only the best of everyone. It is this intelligence that brings Mr. Darcy's admiration of her and her sense that she can rely on both mind and heart. Darcy carries the persona of a snobbish, arrogant, and self-assured man who assumes that he can get everything he wants. He explains his attitude by stating, " I was spoiled by my parents, who though good themselves … allowed, encouraged, almost taught me to be selfish and overbearing." However, his arrogance is challenged when he is faced to deal with the fact that ...
Charlotte Lucas came from a less than affluent background, but she got by. Mr. Collins was only marrying because that was the norm for men. He didn’t care at all about her feelings or wants. Charlotte, however, thought this was a great opportunity for increasing her wealth. After learning of this, Elizabeth Bennet, the main character of Pride and Prejudice, comes to visit her best friend. She sees her friend married contently, but feels something off about it. When asked about her marital situation, Charlotte responds with, “I am not romantic, you know; I never was. I ask only a comfortable home; and considering Mr. Collins’ character, connection, and situation in life, I am convinced that my chance of happiness with him is as fair as most people can boast on entering the marriage state” (Austen 123). When considering marriage back then, most just thought about the monetary gain. Charlotte Lucas is one of those people, by itself wasn’t abnormal. The majority of Regency citizens would wholeheartedly marry for the commercial investment. Ms. Lucas knows that this is the norm of society and if this is how good it can get for this “arrangement,” she would gladly oblige.