Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Knowledge v. ignorance
Ignorance vs knowledge
Knowledge v. ignorance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Knowledge v. ignorance
KADUNA STATE LAND GRABBERS, THEIR SUPPORTERS AND OUR GENERAL INTERESTS
"False knowledge is more dangerous than ignorance" - George Bernard Shaw
My people will s...ay "matambayi baya bata"; which is literally saying those who ask will never get lost. And that is why I like people who are not too ashamed or egotistical to ask when they are lost as to why certain things happen or why they didn't, people who ask to know what happen and what didn't. Because only then will they know what actually happen.
Sometimes, especially on social media, when you humbly ask, the response you will get will be many, varying, conflicting and most times bias and sentimental, but it is only after that that you will make informed decisions and when you publicize your opinion your position and reasoning may be sound.
…show more content…
If you don't have the necessary information and you don't ask, then your judgement will not only be biased but will make you look foolish.
These days people are hardly patient. Some are so desperate to be a journalist and public analyst they are competing for who is first with the "breaking news" or who is first to analyse without all the necessary information.
A few days ago, while many were rushing to post and repost on what is going on in Kaduna State and sharing and re-sharing the views of a certain politician, my good friend, Bimbo Ariyo, who is in UK, about 5,000 kilometers away, made a post and ask a simple question, "Hassan DM, what is going on?" I know what is going on, I've written about it, he read it. But he is also reading something else. So, I set out to visit the affected public institutions and take some pictures to send to him, before I respond again.
On that politician and the governor, I had this to tell Bimbo, that in comparison, this is what is going on. We need to just look at the two personalities.
1) We have two people and two different approach. One wants to be popular and relevant. The other want to leave a
legacy. 2) One is holding an inconsequential position, by Nigerian standard, where no one will ask him how he affected the life people. The other is holding a position where at the end of 4 years we will access his performance both in quality and in quantity. Thus one want to liked, the other want to be appreciated. 3) One is not interested if he is reelected or not, because he has his eyes set on bigger things, and is only interested in providing leadership, and another man who is only interested in being a politician. That is why one is busy working and the other one is saying "at the rate he is going will ruin us". To that person, it is not about delivering good governance, in the long run. It is about reelection. 4) We have one man interested in changing his state and his people over the long term, and another one interested in the short run. That's why one is drastically aiming at wholesale change in the way states affairs are managed, and another one is interested in distributing camels to people during Sallah. In sum, one is short term gains, the other is for long term benefits. 5) Above all, one is "representing" a portion of the state in Abuja, where no one will hold him accountable for lack of roads, water, health facilities, theft of public property etc. The other one is totally and completely responsible for the whole state. That is why when one said a Governor is same as Senator, and some actually believe him, I laughed. Really? If that is true, he should stop whining and wailing and revert the executive orders.
Society is built on the fact that everyone is different: different gender, different hair color, different body types, and, most importantly, different opinions. Although conflict stems from different opinions, humans can not help but have their own thoughts and feelings about every situation. Different opinions, such as democrats vs. republicans or pro-life vs. pro-birth, are just a few examples, on the neverending list, of society spitting their views on a topic. Despite the fact that everyone is so different, people can learn from each other and grow their opinions after hearing the other “side of the story”. We may not always agree with each other, but we should just listen, understand, and respect the fact that everyone has different opinions.
“Our Civilization is flinging itself to pieces. Stand back from the centrifuge” (Bradbury, 84). The novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a comment on the habit of mankind to destroy itself, only to pop right back up from the ashes. The main character, Guy Montag, represents the parts of mankind that are becoming aware of this, through awareness, change through tragedy and obligation to spread both the former.
The movie “PRECIOUS KNOWLEDGE” is about the state of Arizona banning ethnic studies. The movie’s main focus is on Tucson High school, specifically the class known as the Mexican American/Raza Studies. They learned about the honest truths about America along with their own culture. However, many politicians saw this class as un-American and “Stalinist”. This movie showed that the students became thriving adults because they were able to learn about their own cultures. During a political meeting, many politicians felt like this was an unnecessary class that was wasting their tax dollars. One law maker goes as far to say that if Mexican Americans want to learn about their culture, they should go back to Mexico. Many people saw these Mexican American students as lazy and disinterested. This is related to the “canary in the mind pit” analogy because
Throughout the history of mankind there have been numerous cases in which people were victims of oppression or hate. Among these cases the sole reasoning behind this oppression or hate being based on the perception of others. History has shown that society is responsible for labeling groups of people, generally these labels are misleading.
Intellectualism? Have you ever thought what it really means? Does it come naturally or with time and effort? Hidden intellectualism by Gerald Graff explores the concept of street smart incorporated with intelligence, while What College is for? By Gary Gutting explores the theme of books and teachers that will help us achieve intellectualism. These two essays may be different, but contain similar ideas such as intellectualism. They both state that is is important, but they interpret it differently. Gutting describes intellect as something a person can achieve through reading and studying, which make you book smart, while Graff mentions that you don 't have to be book smart in order to be intelligent. Second topic they agree on is openness. Gutting mentions that a student should be open to his teacher 's style of teaching, whereas, Graff argues that students should embrace their own learning style and teachers should accommodate with
People tend to forget the negative parts of the past, holding onto the positive and idealizing it to create nostalgia. It is easy to romanticize and live in the past in order to avoid difficulties in the present. The past becomes a false illusion and an enchanted safe haven from the corruption in reality. However, trying to apply false illusions into reality leads to isolation and corruption. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s book, The Great Gatsby, investigates the detrimental effects of craving the false sense of security in the past. Gatsby’s obsession of a false hope and idealization of the past contrasts the Lost Generation’s attempt to find self-fulfillment after war and the American Dream disillusioned them.
Being unique and forever expanding your knowledge is the only way to stay relevant and to spark change.
The ontology and epistemology of the researcher influences the design of tools for health education. However, it is imperative that the researcher is aware of, one’s own culture, values, assumptions and beliefs (7), and recognizes how these inherent biases/prejudices may influence the design of health education tools. The researcher must be mindful of the target population’s ontology and way of learning so as to ensure that the tool provides learning and information in the manner familiar and comfortable to the recipients as this will increase learning and produce sustainable change. Most importantly, the underlining theory that guides the design of the tool must be commensurate with Indigenous epistemology.
The methods that available in the production of knowledge are limited by the ethical judgments, but the definition of whether the method is ethical or not depends on a couple different things. The first one is the personal judgments. Each person would have different judgments for the same method. However, one personal based judgment cannot be universal. The second one is the social judgment. It is related to the personal judgment. When a personal opinion for a method is agreed by most of people in the society, this opinion would become a social judgment.
In today’s society, a lot of what we are exposed to in the media contains bias, resulting in not entirely accurate information. We can choose what we want to believe ignoring certain facts, which could affect the way we live regarding health and happiness. Ignorance is not “bliss”, but can have a negative impact on our health if we choose to ignore what is happening in the world around us. No matter how much you try to silence your surroundings, your culture, what you identify with, and your habits, will all speak for themself. Silence is the loudest of them all.
The idea of multiple truths can be seen often throughout society. The concept can also be broken down into four subcategories - factual or forensic truths, personal and narrative truths, social or dialogic truths, and healing and restorative truths - as discussed in Dr. Robert Kraft’s Violent Accounts: Understanding the Psychology of Perpetrators through South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. These different types of multiple truths can be seen often between perpetrators and victims, especially throughout court trials. Although these subdivisions of multiple truths aid in the retrieval of information, it is also common if they contradict one another, as seen in parallax truth. These contradictions rely heavily on the relation of
In this paper I will explain what objective knowledge is and why we can have objective knowledge. I will clearly define several key terms that are crucial to this discussion. With these definitions in mind, I will explain the necessity of objective knowledge for reason and reality. Then, I will outline and expound on a reduction absurdum argument, explaining the contradictory postulate and exposing a contradiction. Finally, I will describe the view of Global Skepticism, and show how the Global Skeptic lives in opposition to his or her outlook. Through these arguments, it will be apparent that logic and reality demand the existence of objective knowledge.
Certain people have a manner of handling situations in a way where they do not take the time
I agree with the statement "honesty is the best policy". People will be able to trust people who are honest, liars will have rumors spread around about them, and it's just plain easier to tell the truth. Nobody likes people who lie all the time and won't know whether to trust them or not. People get annoyed by people who lie a lot.
Can you remember the last time someone lied to you? Or how about the last time you lied to someone else? Did you ever stop and ask yourself why? There are so many different reasons that a person might lie. Maybe a lie about something to keep oneself out of trouble, or even a lie to impress other people. But either way there are always going to be serious consequences or effects of lying.