Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contributions of forensic psychology
Essays on forensic psychology
Contributions of forensic psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contributions of forensic psychology
The idea of multiple truths can be seen often throughout society. The concept can also be broken down into four subcategories - factual or forensic truths, personal and narrative truths, social or dialogic truths, and healing and restorative truths - as discussed in Dr. Robert Kraft’s Violent Accounts: Understanding the Psychology of Perpetrators through South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. These different types of multiple truths can be seen often between perpetrators and victims, especially throughout court trials. Although these subdivisions of multiple truths aid in the retrieval of information, it is also common if they contradict one another, as seen in parallax truth. These contradictions rely heavily on the relation of …show more content…
This particular truth deals with hard evidence and it answers the questions of who, what, when, where, and how. The second subdivision is personal and narrative truth. This truth is concerned with relaying information by telling stories, personal experiences, and perceptions. Personal truth is very important, but it also often conflicts with other people’s personal truths. The third type of multiple truth is social or dialogic truth, which deals with interactions between the court officials, the perpetrators, and advocates, and the victims. The fourth, and final, is healing and restorative truth. This encompasses the perpetrators acknowledging the suffering their victims have experienced. These four subdivisions of multiple truths are all important and are all often touched upon in testimonies during court trials, such as the Benzien …show more content…
For example, multiple truths are seen daily during police reports. If someone’s car was stolen, for instance, they would go through the process of the four types of truths. They would give factual evidence concerning the situation, they would give a narrative explaining their experience of the incident, and they would tell the officer the social aspect by stating with which who they interacted. The healing aspect would most likely be present later when trying to understand why someone had stolen their car and while trying to acknowledge their own suffering. Another example is if someone gets in a fight. Not only would the four truths be present, but parallax truth could also be present. If someone was injured during the fight, it may seem that the other person attacked the person who was injured, while the attacker may have injured the other person out of self defense. The situations do not necessarily even need to be violent - it may be as simple as telling your professor that you lost your homework, or forget to study for their exam. There are many everyday situations that contain multiple
Justice can be achieved through various processes and principles if applied correctly, similarly justice can also be denied through these same processes and principles. This is exemplified through the Andrew Mallard case (M v The Queen 2005 HCA 68), and the missing persons case of Kieffen Raggett (2007) which shows how the incorrect application of processes like police investigations and coronial inquests can lead to justice being denied. Furthermore, legal principles such as; the rights of the accused and victims, are instrumental in achieving justice as shown through the application of these principles within these cases. These processes and principles can fail due to prejudged conclusions, police corruption, human error and cultural barriers
This paper will consider eye witness testimony and its place in convicting accused criminals. Psychology online (2013) defines “eye witness testimony” as a statement from a person who has witnessed a crime, and is capable of communicating what they have seen, to a court of law under oath. Eye witness testimonies are used to convict accused criminals due to the first hand nature of the eye witnesses’ observations. There are however many faults within this system of identification. Characteristics of the crime is the first issue that will be discussed in this paper, and the flaws that have been identified. The second issue to be discussed will be the stress impact and the inability to correctly identify the accused in a violent or weapon focused crime. The third issue to be discussed is inter racial identification and the problems faced when this becomes a prominent issue. The fourth issue will be time lapse, meaning, the time between the crime and the eye witness making a statement and how the memory can be misconstrued in this time frame. To follow this will be the issue of how much trust jurors-who have no legal training-put on to the eye witness testimony, which may be faltered. This paper references the works of primarily Wells and Olsen (2003) and Rodin (1987) and Schmechel et al. (2006) it will be argued that eye witness testimony is not always accurate, due to many features; inter racial identification, characteristics of the crime, response latency, and line up procedures therefore this paper will confirm that eyewitness testimonies should not be utilised in the criminal ju...
The main purpose of this article is to look at the possible link between race and exoneration, and how race and wrongful convictions lead to the exonerations. There were three reasons that the authors chose this topic to research. The first reason was the research previously done in the field show racial biased in the criminal justice system. This paper looks at how that effects wrongful conviction and the subsequent exoneration. The second reason is because if there is an innocent person in prison that means that the real culprit is still out there, and more than likely committing more crimes. The third reason is racial composition of the dyad, victim and the perpetrator. This article is the first to mention the dyad and the authors focus on that in their discussion of wrongful conviction. This article is a very insightful look at the problem of the racial bias in the system that leads to wrongful conviction and how that leads to exoneration. It effectively explains the causes of wrongful convictions and how race affects those causes, especially how the dyad is incorporated in it.
To demonstrate the issues that come about in eyewitness testimony, this paper will take a moment to examine R. v. Steven Murray Truscott. Truscott was being charged for the rape and murder of Lynne Harper. This case was fairly confusing as there were many eyewitnesses both for and against Truscott. Truscott claimed that Harper had asked him to give her a bike ride to the intersection of Country Road and Highway 8, where he dropped her off and left. On his way back he claimed to have stopped at a nearby bridge where he could see the intersection, and watched as Harper entered a grey car with a yellow license plate. Three separate witnesses actually claimed that they did in fact see Truscott around the road and bridge at the times he claimed
Stewart, M. (2011). The space between the steps: reckoning in an area of reconciliation. Contemporary Justice Review, 14(1), 43-63. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/10282580.2011.541076
The reading “Stranger Than True” by Barry Winston is not familiar to me, yet an intriguing and fascinating story. The principal point of the writer, who specializes in criminal law tried to convey was that everything isn't so black and white. Everybody is honest until demonstrated blameworthy despite all proof points against them.
The memory of the occasion may not be crisp and might be adjusted each time it is recovered from memory and not just that, new data can make the old data to be lost. Its reliability is addressed as far as how much the witness can precisely review all snippets of data, particularly having encountered high measures of weapon focus and the reliability of the elderly. Also, likewise, the race factor and the mediating line-up which additionally assumes a part in misleading the witness. Eyewitness testimony will dependably remain a fundamental wellspring of substantiation, however, the utilization of it ought to be deliberately quantified to keep away from any erroneous data or commixed up feelings as it can eradicate someone else's
Eyewitness testimony plays an important role in any crime nowadays. It is also one of the most important types of evidence in court cases. However, many researchers have suggested that judges and investigators should know more about how reliable is eyewitness testimony. According to Read (2002) “It is important that we recognize the possibility of several stages or types of processing of event information because the greater the number of stages and cognitive activates involved, the greater the opportunities for error or low reliability”
In ‘Whose Statement Is It? An Examination of Victim Impact Statements Delivered in Court’, the researchers looked at several different concepts and questions pertaining to victim impact statements. To help victims alleviate their suffering, victim impact statements are a way that the criminal justice system implemented to allow victims to participate in the case and have a voice. One of the issues with this is that the narratives are regulated which can lead to frustration and anger from the victims. Victims might not be able to express their true emotions and feeling to the offender or to the court. These constraints on the victim impact statements may hinder their healing and neglect their therapeutic purpose. The study’s objective is to
The nine segments of the interrogation process is extensive but will be briefly summarized below. The first stage includes confrontational statements indicating plausible guilt to convey to the suspect that his guilt is known to be true by the interrogator. The following stage develops through posing questions to unfold a theme as to how and why the crime transpired. It is here the interrogator makes note of whether the suspect is emotional or non-emotional and acts accordingly by tailoring an approach to the suspects personality using a moral approach, for example. The third step handles the denials by acutely dismissing them, as “suspects who deny their involvement in criminal activity are less likely to offer a confession later in the interrogation”. Fourthly, the interrogator aims to overcome the objections of the suspect by reinstating the theme and prompting a confession. The fifth stage refers to the retention of the suspect’s attention, this step is crucial as guilty suspects tend to withdraw psychologically at this point, therefore the interrogator must capture and retain their attention through visual aids or increasing proximity. Stage six pertains to appealing to the passive suspects who are now willing to listen and could be outwardly emotional, here is where interrogators empathetically urge the suspect to tell the truth.
Forensic reports inform and influence the outcome of legal proceedings. The forensic psychologist utilize the following factor when preparing a written report: (a) who requested the report; (b) who will be reading the report, and (c) what information is needed to be reported. With this being said, forensic reports need to include clarity, straightforwardness, as well as being brief (Conroy, 2006). According to Jackson (2008) forensic psychologist report must reflect accuracy. Therefore, one must acknowledge and disclose discrepancy of the assessment tool, as well as the validity and reliability of the report. When putting statements in a report, the forensic psychologist must identify the statement is fact, inference, or professional opinion. This goes back to the role of the forensic psychologist who is to remain objective. Last the report should not include jargon or utilize clinical terminology (Jackson, 2008). The purpose of this paper is to identify ethical dilemma in report writing.
Tata, C, (2010). A sense of justice : The role of pre-sentence reports in the production (and disruption) of guilt and guilty pleas. Punishment & Society, 12, 239-261.
First of all, eyewitness memory is very unreliable, yet, very important in order to decide whether or not to convict an individual. A incorrect or inaccurate judgement could lead to a false conviction. Therefore, it is imperative to be able to be able to extract accurate, detailed and correct information from them. Detecting deception methods discussed above such is not as effective as cognitive interviewing if the goal is to reduce wrongful convictions because it directly and indirectly reduces the possible error rate of eyewitness
Pozzulo et al. (2015) states, one of the main issues with memories is that they can be very easily changed. Every time they are retrieved, people tend to forget parts and fill in the blanks to make the memories make sense. When a police officer questions an eyewitness they must take into consideration the phenomenon of memory conformity. Memory conformity is what occurs when, “what one witness reports influences what another witness reports” (Pozzulo et al., 2015, p. 128). This is one of the ways that memories can be affected. Another way Pozzulo et al. (2015) states that memories can be influenced is when incorrect or added information is introduced after an event and becomes part of the memory. This is called the misinformation effect. The misinformation effect can happen to a witness when they are exposed to lots of media coverage on the event that happened. There is also third way Pozzulo et al. (2015) describes how memories get corrupted and it is through the wording of a question. For example, the way a police officer words a question to the witness will affect how they recall that memory. The memory conformity phenomenon, the misinformation effect and how a question is worded can all corrupt an individual’s memory and this makes eyewitness testimonies less
Human memory and perception play an integral role within the debate surrounding the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. According to Loftus (1975) the memory’s ability to encode, store and recover information is based on the three fundamental processes of Acquisition, Retention and Retrieval. It is these three functions of the brain that are effected when a person is witness to a crime. By referring to both Wise et al. (2009) and Loftus (1975) a concept known as the Reconstructive Theory of Memory occurs when an individual witnesses a crime. It asserts that, contrary to popular belief, the human brain does not record memories precisely as they have occurred but rather, according to Bartol and Bartol (as cited in Wise et al, 2009) “involves the integration of perceptual information with pre-existing experiences, as well as with other subjective relevant information that may be introduced later” (p. 455). It is therefore clear that in regards to this theory, the accuracy of eye-witness testimony is impeded by the processes surrounding human memory and perception.