False Advertising Case Study

1846 Words4 Pages

1 False advertising is the act of drawing openly regard for an item or a private company for expanding deals. There is something else which is called false promoting. False promoting makes misdirecting data to the customers who is expending the item because of the ad that draws in them towards the item. In any case, they don't have the foggiest idea about the way that they are being swindled in purchasing the item. This is morally off-base. Now and then organizations confer this duping to acquire more benefit. Because of this tricking customer fall into a trap. To some expansive degree organizations can run numerous sorts of notices that are deluding and manipulative. The organization which for the most part does false promoting is tobacco organizations. They are the greatest …show more content…

Justify your reasons with explanation.
In my opinion , it is not ethical for a company to make profit using false advertising , that is because of a few reasons below :
Investigation
If a marketing campaign is suspected of being false advertising, the FTC may investigate further to determine if the company violates any laws. The FTC reviews the content of the ad from the standpoint of a consumer to determine if the actual or implied claims constitute falsification. The FTC also evaluates information that is left out, such as failing to report side effects of a new medication.
Cease-and-Desist Orders
In some cases, the company may receive a cease-and-desist order to stop the falsified advertisement from running. The advertisements must be brought up to FTC standards before they are allowed to run again. This may include correcting any false information and adding in the information omitted from the advertisements. In addition, the company may have to include additional disclaimers in future advertisements or let anyone who purchased the item that the company used deceptive practices.
Financial

Open Document