Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
An “industrial relations systems” refers to the rules, regulations and institutions that govern the employment relationship and which set the terms and conditions of work and employment. From 2009, Australia had a new industrial relations framework that created a “truly national system in the private sector, the statutory framework and processes have been simplified and the governing legislation had been completely rewritten to reflect the new Constitutional basis for the system”. However prior to this, in 2006 was the introduction of legislation such as the Workplace Relations Amendment (WorkChoices) Act which was highly controversial because it was seen to shift influence and power dramatically back to the employer and created an unfair balance in the employer-employee relationships. In …show more content…
relation to the practical changes, WorkChoices also increased employment insecurity by removing unfair dismissal protection. In 2009 , the Fair Work Act was introduced as a way of removing some of the most unpopular aspects of the Workchoices and re-balancing the power in the employment relationship.Although some still argue that through the last decade, industrial relations and the labour market have been re-regulated rather than deregulated,and that this re-regulation has been in favour of businesses and employers rather than employees and unions.
Increasing job insecurity and excessive managerial prerogative to “fire at will” were regarded as the wo main problems with WorkChoices. The Fair Work Act introduced the notion of a “ fair dismissal” system that sets out the steps that an employer should go through before dismissing an employee. According to s 385 of the Fair Work Act 2009, an unfair dismissal occurs ‘ if the person has been dismissed;the dismissal is deemed to be harsh and unreasonable…’. Employees are protected from unfair dismissal as long as they satisfy a probationary period of eomployments (6-12 months) and they are covered by an award or agreement. However, this does not apply for those that are note covered by an award or agreement and earn above the high income
threshold. Stuart (2008) notes that “ the most significant parts of the Fair Work Act are those that enhance individual rights and protections for employees . Employers will need to be aware of, and adjust to, the significant changes made to the safety net under the NES and the modern award system, and the restoration or extension of unfair dismissal rights”. The objective of the Federal Governments industrial relations agenda (Fair Work Act) is to encourage a harmonious and efficient employment relationship and to provide a safety net of minimum employment standards ( the NES) that applies to all employees covered by the national system , as well as new bargaining rules for employers and employees.The 10 minimum workplace entitlements in the NES include: 1. A maximum standard working week of 38 hours for full-time employees, plus ‘reasonable’ additional hours. 2. A right to request flexible working arrangements. 3. Parental and adoption leave of 12 months (unpaid), with a right to request an additional 12 months. 4. Four weeks paid annual leave each year (pro rata). 5. Ten days paid personal/carer’s leave each year (pro rata), two days paid compassionate leave for each permissible occasion, and two days unpaid carer’s leave for each permissible occasion. 6. Community service leave for jury service or activities dealing with certain emergencies or natural disasters. This leave is unpaid except for jury service. 7. Long service leave. 8. Public holidays and the entitlement to be paid for ordinary hours on those days. 9. Notice of termination and redundancy pay. 10. The right for new employees to receive the Fair Work Information Statement. These are further complemented by a revised “Modern Awards” system. Modern awards are an enforceable document containing minimum terms and conditions of employment relating to a particular industry/occupation and may contain terms about: - minimum wages - penalty rates - Types of employment - Flexible working arrangements - Hours of work - Rest breaks - Allowances - Leave and leave loading - Superannuation - Procedures for consultation, representation, and dispute settlement. Under the new legislation, Modern Awards apply to all employees historically covered by awards. Those employees who are in senior positions not historically covered by awards and those who earn more than the annual high income threshold may agree to terms directly with their employer ,as long as the NES are mainteained. Modern awards will be reviewed every four years to ensure their ongoing community and exocnomic relevance. In addition, there are also Enterprise Agreements which are negotiatied agreements under the principle of good faith bargaining that are usually between unions and the employers or the employers representative. Good Faith bargainging expects that the parties will attend meetings as arranged , will provide information and respond ina temily manner and will also give genuine considerations to proposals formt he parties in negotiation.Agreements include matters relevant to the enterprise such as: - Rate of pay - Employmentcondiionts;eg hours of work,meal breaks, overtime - Dispute resolution procedures Once the enterprise agreement is approved by the Fair Work Commission, it is enforceable and provides for changes in the terms and conditions of employment that apply at your workplace. Also, there is an emphasised focus on providing flexibility options for working paremts. Including a right to request flexible work arrangements and INividuvial Flexibility Arrenageemnts (IFAs). These provide an option for employees and employers to negotitaite to change th term of the enterprise agremement covering them, so long as they do not undercut the overall terms of the enterprise agreement. That is , they are subject to the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT).Flexibility is an areas of considerable controversy, with employers seeking more flexibility in employment conditions and employees often seeking more flexibility and enhanced security to balance work and family. Previously the industrial relations system was based on compulsory conciliation and arbitration established in 1904 by the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration and the collective representation of employees and employers. From 2009 onwards, the new system within the Fair Work Act favours negotiations between individual employers and their employees to encourage more fluid relationships between the two parties. Th term ‘industrial association’ is used to describe the organisation that may represent either of the aparties – employers or employees. Employers are free to join trade unions and the concept of freedom of association refers to the right of employees to belong or not to belong to a union. Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (s 336) employees are ‘(i) free to become, or not become , members of industrial associations; and (ii) free ot be represented, or not represented , by industrial associations’. While the Fair Work Act 2009 has not significantly increased the role of power of unions , there are some changes that provide a less hostile environment for unions . For example, union officials who have entry permits may now enter workplaces whre they have potential members, whether or not the employees are covered by an award or agreement binding on the union. Further, under the Fair Work Act 2009, if an employer is refusing to bargain with employees, a representative may apply to the commission stating that a majority of an enterprises employees want to bargain for an agreement. If satisfied that there is a desire to be represented, the COmmisison can issue a majority support determination requiring the employer to enter into bargiaging. In conclusion, the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) has had an immense influence on not only how employers and workers interact with eachother when attempting to negotiate working conditions but also the approach to regulating work pursued by employers under this regulatory regime.
The character of the Fair Work Commission is to ensure that the negotiating process and industrial activity are carried out in accordance to the Commonwealth workplace laws. Bargaining representatives of workers must contact the Fair Work Commission before they want to take industrial action to assist their claims (Australian Government,
Throughout the 20th century, Australia has maintained a system of tribunals to make decisions about wage and non wage outcomes and to help resolve industrial disputes. Institutional forces affect the operation of the free market in order to improve labour market outcomes, such as guaranteeing minimum wages and conditions. The four institutional forces that affect labour markets are Governments, Trade Unions, Employer associations and Industrial Relations tribunal.
One of the most striking examples of this is the substantial numbers of individuals who have been sacked (and also in consequence lost their medical care) because their employer’s lawyers were afraid that remarks that these individuals had made might lead to some other indignant and affronted employee suing the employer for allowing them to be subjected to a ‘hostile work environment’. A member of a legally privileged ‘minority’ might well then be awarded vast damages for some trivial remark. In consequence employers now even snoop on conversations and e-mails between two friendly consenting employees lest they contain a comment which might be unco...
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was originally enacted in 1938. The law is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor, and includes 5 major provisions that protect employees. (TEXT) The five provisions include: coverage, minimum wage, overtime pay, youth employment, and record keeping. Coverage refers to the types of workers whom are protected by the FLSA. The FLSA also handles compensation issues like minimum wage, commissions, bonuses, expenses like room and board and other various deductions. To ensure that employees receive adequate compensation for working additional hours the FLSA has developed rules governing overtime pay. The Act also created and implemented rules governing youth
Sappey, R., Burgess, J., Lyons, M., & Buultjens, J. (2009) Industrial relations in Australia: work and workplace. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
14. Fair Labor Standards Act, www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk, 6/11/04 --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Fair Labor Standards Act; www.inforplease.com, June 11, 2004.
“The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was created in 1938 to establish a minimum wage and a limit on the number of hours which may be worked in a standard work week. It also provides standards for equal pay, overtime pay, record keeping, and child labor.” This law was created during a time period of great financial and political turmoil.
..., (21 and over). The Employment Rights Act of 1996 has included benefits UK’s citizens with four weeks paid yearly leave, sick pay, maternity and father leave. All employees are legally entitled to 5.6 weeks paid holiday time per year. All employers are responsible of their employee’s health and safety care. Adults are limited to 48 hours per week of work. Direct/indirect discrimination or harassment is not tolerated as well as favoritism. Age, disability, sexual orientation, race, religion, etc. are all factors. The UK is in progress for a plan of terminations.
The Canadian employment law system consists of three regimes: common law, employment regulation, and collective bargaining agreement (CBA). From these regimes, the common law of employment is one that was created by Judges over centuries in order to regulate the employer-employee relationship. Judges, from lower level to upper level courts have used employment contracts and torts, two tools available to them under the common law system to aid in decision-making with respect to employment law cases. The decisions of which have been recorded and used as a precedent in future employment law cases of the same nature. When considering the common law of employment from the three listed regimes, I relate to speaker two while disagreeing with speaker one. Although, the common law of employment has historically excluded protections covered by the employment legislation and CBA, which has made it appear to favor the economic interests of employers more than employees, it has not completely put employees at a disadvantage because, it has protected them and their interests in other significant a...
In conclusion, there are many rights to the employees’ when it comes down to equal opportunity employment. In this paper you learned of a few different types of discrimination towards employees’ and how different acts protect them in the workforce. It also has shown what rights a person has as an employee in the working environment.
There are many different approaches and theories regarding industrial relations nowadays. In order to mount an opinion on which is the ‘best’ or most appropriate theory of industrial relations, each theory will have to be analyzed. The three most prevalent theories of industrial relations which exist are The Unitarist theory, The Pluralist theory and The Marxist theory. Each offers a particular perception of workplace relations and will therefore interpret such events as workplace conflict, the role of trade unions and job regulation very differently. I will examine each of these theories in turn and then formulate my own opinion regarding which is the ‘best’ or most appropriate theory.
Industrial relations is an umbrella concept that overall encompasses the relationship between the employer and the employee on the contrary Industrial conflict between or among groups, industries and government. Economically, the factor of productivity in workplace is very important
One of the main debates concerning industrial relations in Australia is the method used to organise and manage labour. Although both the current government and the opposition share differing opinions on the current industrial relations laws, most of the issues concern the use of third parties or unions, individualist and collectivist frames of reference and individual vs. collective bargaining. According to Accel-Team, appropriate industrial relations laws are there to protect both parties by protecting the weak (hence minimum wage); outlaw discrimination (race, sex, etc); determine minimum standards of safety, health, hygiene and minimum employment conditions (sick leave, annual leave, etc) to prevent the abuse of power by either party (Accel-team. 2005). If all these areas are addressed in the best interest of both the workers and managers, then this has the potential to lead to good industrial relations.
An important aspect of this framework conceives the industrial relations system as self-adjusting towards equilibrium. In so far as change in one element had repercussions for the other elements, they are held to set in motion a range of processes that invariably restores a sense of order on the system. Strategic choice theory Another widely used and more recent theory drawing on pluralist assumptions is Kochan, Katz and McKersie’s (1986) strategic choice theory. This particular theory picks up on the systems concept developed by Dunlop (1958) and advanced on it by accommodating a number of contemporary changes in the way industrial relations was being practiced. Three such changes are noted as being influential in determining the way managers deal with industrial relations issues. The first is identified in the recent decline in union membership and the rise of new industries not covered by unions. The second is noted in the way collective bargaining structures and outcomes involving trade unions
According to John Dunlop -“An industrial relation system at any one time in its development is regarded as comprised of certain actors, certain contexts, an ideology which binds the industrial relation system together and a body of rules created to govern the actors at the work place and work community.”