Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Issues on reconstruction
Reconstruction and civil rights
Social changes post civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The end of the Civil War in 1865 exited a period of strife and conflict and rapidly ushered in another. At the dawn of the period of Reconstruction, the relatively new nation of America was availed of an opportunity to redefine itself based on the principles of true freedom for all of its citizens. Unfortunately, the ingrained biases, preferences, and selfishness of the human condition consigned the possibility to the gloom of unrecognized potential. Due to legislative outcomes, the attitudes of the public sphere, and the condition of the freed slaves at the end of 1877, Reconstruction should be considered a failure. Legislative actions were a significant contributor to the failure of Reconstruction. The outlook of the freed slaves at the end …show more content…
of the Civil War was one filled with opportunity and optimism. In January of 1865, General Sherman of the Union forces issued Special Field Order 15, which endowed freed slaves with a land grant of forty acres and a mule. Just a few short months later, President Andrew Johnson reversed this order and instructed that possession of all lands be returned to their prior owners. The claim to “40 Acres and a Mule” became a rallying cry, a cause, for the blacks of the South, for it was in the possession of land that freedom was defined. The taste of freedom had been given, and then quickly taken away, and this was just the first of a success of such retractions. Another significant legislative failure of the era was the passage of Black Codes in the southern states.
The elite planter class resisted en masse the implementation of freedom through equality, and these groups of laws were the very embodiment of that denial. In essence, the Black Codes re-established slavery through legislated racism that prohibited a variety of rights including voting and also required blacks to engage in annual labor contracts which were, in essence, forced contractual slavery. The North responded quickly with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, but even this Act required a congressional override of a presidential veto to become enacted and it still did not protect the right to vote for blacks. The codification of racism into law, through loopholes such as poll taxes, literacy testing, and property ownership requirements, continued throughout the era and extended far into the future of America. (Foner, Eric. Give Me Liberty! An American History, p …show more content…
585) The second sign of the failure of Reconstruction can be found in the attitudes of the public sphere surrounding issues of black freedoms, rights, and equality. Most negative in their views were the planters of the South. They viewed freed slaves as lazy, unambitious, and lacking in moral character (575). The very same laborers that had, for decades, provided back-breaking labor to line the pockets of the ruling elite were now somehow to be thought of as a slothful class, while those making these same accusations were loathe themselves to dirty their hands in the fields of labor. This attitude was not limited only to the South, but also experienced a rebirth and growth in the North. The re-election of President Grant in 1872 resulted in an outcry from Liberal Republicans against the continued failures of the Reconstruction efforts in the South. Many believed that the problems with Reconstruction were not caused by the selfish “carpet baggers and scalawags” and the still-influential planter elite, but rather could be blamed on the involvement of blacks and the “Negro government” (598) that they alleged had risen to power. Racism was wide-spread and accepted without judgement. This attitude, along with a general Northern fatigue for all things Reconstruction, also contributed to the eventual failure of the policies of Reconstruction. Finally, and most significantly, the condition of the freed slaves by the end of 1877 – economic prospects, actual realized freedoms, freedom of person – clearly supports the failure of Reconstruction.
On the whole, they had certainly experienced gains over the twelve years since the surrender of the Confederacy. They were certainly allowed to marry, to travel freely, to own their own labor, to own property, and to vote. However, all of these freedoms also came with restrictions that would often nullify their actual practice. The state of free labor is one clear example of this less-than-ideal reality. Because there were strict restrictions on land ownership, most blacks were circumstantially force to return to labor on the very plantations and for the very same owners from which they had been freed just a brief time earlier. Under the guise of free labor, they entered into sharecropping agreements that presented the theoretical possibility of self-sufficiency and financial growth. The reality was often quite different as they signed away many of their rights through these agreements that essentially consigned them once more to a status of slavery controlled by the plantation owner.
(574) Another clear example of the failure of Reconstruction to change the condition of freed slaves for the better was the birth and rise to power of the Ku Klux Klan. Founded in 1866 in Tennessee, this organization existed solely to terrorize and intimidate blacks and those that supported their rights and freedoms. Their membership consisted of individuals that thought themselves “respectable citizens” (595) who engaged in acts of violence and murder against blacks. The freed slaves had escaped a system of brutality and physical abuse at the hand of their white owners and within a year found themselves under the tyranny of yet again these same individuals, only this time in hoods and robes. Federal enforcement acts passed in 1870 and 1871 outlawed this organization and federal forces were used to support their suppression. By 1872, peace was present throughout the entire South, but this was a peace of the white man, not the black man. Though disbanded, the specter of the KKK would always loom large and serve as a constant reminder to blacks of their role in society as an inferior class. In less than fifty years, the KKK would experience a resurgence that returned their reign of terror to the South that would pervade much of the twentieth century. The failure of Reconstruction is most evident in the inability of the freed slaves to be able to feel a sense of freedom in their economic or physical condition. At the end of the Civil War, a new era was dawning for the black man in America. His voice was being heard and the canvas of his future was blank and ready to be drawn. The process of creating a definition of what freedom meant and how it would apply in a practical sense was just beginning. However, by 1877, Blacks’ legal rights and freedoms were scarcely expanded, racism ran rampant throughout the nation, and a sense of true freedom remained elusive. At the sunset of era, it was clear that Reconstruction was a failure.
Even when the Amendment abolished slavery in 1865, and the black people embraced education, built their own churches, reunited with their broken families and worked very hard in the sharecropping system, nothing was enough for the Reconstruction to succeed. Whites never gave total freedom to African Americans. Blacks were forced to endure curfews, passes, and living on rented land, which put them in a similar situation as slaves. In
The ex-slaves after the Civil War didn’t have a place to settle or money. They had no skills other than farming to procure jobs, so they couldn’t earn money. Freedmen’s Bureau provided shelter, resources, education, and taught necessary skills to get jobs (Jordan 386). Though the issue of slavery was solved, racism continues and Southerners that stayed after the war passed Black Codes which subverted the ideas of freedom including the actions of state legislatures (Hakim 19). Black Codes were a set of laws that discriminated against blacks and limited their freedom (Jordan 388).
In conclusion, Reconstruction failed for the freedmen for a variety of reasons. I believe the main reason for this failure was the inability for the two political parties to agree on what they wanted to achieve. Did they want total freedom for the freed slaves, only partial freedom, or just the rebuilding that issue coupled with unpopularity, the freedman’s culture being rooted in the south, and the freed slaves’ inability to find work outside of the south resulted in a process that took over a century to work successfully. I feel that it is very unfortunate that President Lincoln was killed so shortly after the end of the Civil War. I believe that since Reconstruction was Lincoln’s idea he would have carried it out more successfully than his successors did.
The Civil War brought forth countless problems that begged to be solved through the complex web that was reconstruction. Unfortunately the success of this plan was questionable. Did the Nation regain it's unification and take large steps towards equality? Or did the lack of change for freedmen hinder the effectiveness of Reconstruction? Perhaps America is still on the long road of Reconstruction, despite the amount of progress we have made.
The social history regarding reconstruction has been of great controversy for the last two decades in America. Several wars that occurred in America made reconstruction efforts to lag behind. Fundamental shortcomings of the reconstruction were based on racism, politics, capitalism and social relations. The philosophy was dominant by the people of South under the leadership of Lincoln. Lincoln plans were projected towards bringing the states from the South together as one nation. However, the efforts of the Activist were faded by the intrusion of the Republicans from the North. Northerners were capitalists and disapproved the ideas that Lincoln attempted to spread in the South (Foner Par 2).
It was 1865, black men were tasting freedom, the confederation was defeated, the south was defeated but the unchained blacks had no real freedom. "A man maybe free and yet not independent," Mississippi planter Sammuel Agnew observed in his diary (Foner 481). This same year General Sherman issued the Special Field Order 15, in attempt to provide land for the ex-slaves. There was 40 acres of land and a mule waiting for the emancipated slaves, this gave hope for an economic development among blacks' communities. The Special Field Order 15 put all the land under federal control acquired by the government during the war to use for the homestead of the blacks. Even thought the offer of land some slave fled ...
The Reconstruction was undoubtedly a failure. The political and social aim of Reconstruction was to form national unity as well as create civil rights and equality for African Americans. Even though Reconstruction laid the foundation for equal rights in the United States, it did not achieve its primary goals. In the time of Reconstruction, many African Americans still felt the effects of oppression and many were still trapped in an undesirable social and economic class. The Reconstruction was an overall fail despite the fact that it was the shaky groundwork for a fight for equality in the years to come.
America has gone through many hardships and struggles since coming together as a nation involving war and changes in the political system. Many highly regarded leaders in America have come bestowing their own ideas and foundation to provide a better life for “Americans”, but no other war or political change is more infamous than the civil war and reconstruction. Reconstruction started in 1865 and ended in 1877 and still to date one of the most debated issues in American history on whether reconstruction was a failure or success as well as a contest over the memory, meaning, and ending of the war. According to, “Major Problems in American History” David W. Blight of Yale University and Steven Hahn of the University of Pennsylvania take different stances on the meaning of reconstruction, and what caused its demise. David W. Blight argues that reconstruction was a conflict between two solely significant, but incompatible objectives that “vied” for attention both reconciliation and emancipation. On the other hand Steven Hahn argues that former slaves and confederates were willing and prepared to fight for what they believed in “reflecting a long tradition of southern violence that had previously undergirded slavery” Hahn also believes that reconstruction ended when the North grew tired of the 16 year freedom conflict. Although many people are unsure, Hahn’s arguments presents a more favorable appeal from support from his argument oppose to Blight. The inevitable end of reconstruction was the North pulling federal troops from the south allowing white rule to reign again and proving time travel exist as freed Africans in the south again had their civil, political, and economical position oppressed.
As a country, America has gone through many political changes throughout her lifetime. Leaders have come and gone, all of them having different objectives and plans for the future. As history takes its course, though, most all of these “revolutionary movements” come to an end. One such movement was Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a time period in America consisting of many leaders, goals and accomplishments. Though, like all things in life, it did come to an end, the resulting outcome has been labeled both a success and a failure. When Reconstruction began in 1865, a broken America had just finished fighting the Civil War. In all respects, Reconstruction was mainly just that. It was a time period of “putting back the pieces”, as people
After the ending of the Civil War in 1865, slavery was, at last, formally abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment. Due to the freedom of these African Americans and the South’s ever-growing hatred towards this group, African Americans were left to suffer harsh discrimination and horrible conditions. Africans Americans were left without homes, education, jobs, or money. Reconstruction was the Radical Republicans’ attempt to try and bring the Confederate states back to normal and unite both the South and the North into a whole country once again. Reconstruction was also set to protect and help the newly freed African Americans assimilate to the new society and the foreign economy they were placed in. Conditions of the African Americans in the South before, during, and after the reconstruction period were no doubt harsh. African Americans, before the Reconstruction Era, struggled to assimilate with the hateful society they were thrown in, if not still slaves. Although their condition improved slightly, African Americans during the reconstruction period experienced extreme terrorism, discrimination, pressure, and hatred from the south, along with the struggle of keeping alive. After the military was taken out of the South, African Americans’ condition after the Reconstruction Era relapsed back as if Reconstruction never happened.
William Mason Grosvenor believes that Reconstruction should be harsh. Grosvenor has two main arguments to support this belief, manifest destiny and the potential for the reoccurrence of a similar event to the war if Reconstruction was carried out in a lenient manner. Grosvenor argues that the country, pre-Civil War, was never truly a single unified country, but rather a group of peoples with vastly different values held together by a constitution which they had outgrown, saying, “[n]o chemical union had ever taken place; for that the white-hot crucible of civil war was found necessary.” Furthermore, Grosvenor believes that the succession of the South demonstrated this divide while simultaneously violating the doctrine of manifest destiny through
Even with this government legislation, the newly dubbed 'freedmen' were still discriminated against by most people and, ironically, they were soon to be restricted and segregated once again under government rulings in important court cases of the era. Reconstruction was intended to give African-Americans the chance for a new and better life. Many of them stayed with their old masters after being freed, while others left in search of opportunity through education as well as land ownership. However, this was not exactly an easy task. There were many things standing in their way, chiefly white supremacists and the laws and restrictions they placed upon African-Americans.
On one hand the slaves were free, and on the other hand they were not given equal rights, and they were discriminated for the color of their skin tone. In other words, Reconstruction was a mixed success, which combined both positive and negative impacts. By the end of the era, the North and South were once again reunited, and all southern state legislatures had abolished slavery in their constitutions. However, it some sense, Reconstruction was a failure because blacks were not provided equal rights and opportunities. Racism and segregation did not end at all. On the other hand, there was a huge change to the country as the US was completely in a chaos stage during the civil war. Despite some obstructions, it can be concluded that the Reconstruction was somewhat beneficial for African American. As time passes, many schools and colleges were founded for blacks, and many other doors were opened to uplift their life. Overall, all these outcomes can be considered as a huge
William Howard Russell once said, "Little did I conceive of the greatness of the defeat, the magnitude of the disaster which it had entailed upon the United States. So short-lived has been the American Union, that men who saw it rise may live to see it fall.” At one point in History, the United States was not one nation. The Civil War had created many issues for the United States and the country was desperate for a solution. This solution was thought to be reconstruction. Reconstruction was the attempt from the early 60's until the late 70's to resolve the issues of the war after slavery was dismissed and the Confederacy was defeated. Reconstruction also attempted to address how states would again become part of the Union, the status of Confederate leaders, and the status of African Americans across the United States.
With the end of the Civil war in 1865, the new nation of the United States now faced challenges on restoring peace within the Union. The North, having won the civil war, now faced the task to implement reconstruction of the South. They came in contact with the questions of: What should happen to the freed slaves, should the freed slaves have rights, what should be done to the Confederate leaders, and how should the South be reconstructed? There were many different ideas and views on how Reconstruction should be handled, but only one succeeded more successfully than the other. Although they bear some superficial similarities, the difference between presidential and congressional reconstruction are clear. The president believed that Confederate