Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Equality in education
Racial inequality the impact on society
Equality in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Equality in education
A clear and persistent gap in test scores at all levels of education has existed between Anglos and minorities which have puzzled researchers for decades. While not all individuals of a minority group score less than all Anglos, a member of a racial minority group is still more likely to have lower test scores. Being that minority racial groups – African Americans and Hispanics – are growing relative to the aggregate American population demographics, it’s imperative for researchers studying the field of student achievement to identify this problem, discover the factors which lead to it, and use their research to bring about reform to help close the test score gap between these racial groups. The issue is of central importance for society since numerous societal institutions besides educational institutions rank individuals by their test scores to demonstrate competency, and there exists a limited number of openings for employment. Thus, there exists competition to secure minimum test scores to be granted access to these jobs and institutions. If certain racial groups are, on average, scoring lower, than this will mean members of these racial groups will be underrepresented in societal institutions. Only via reducing the test score gaps between Anglo and minority racial groups can there exist equitable representation.
Greater representation for racial minorities in society often means more social and economic opportunities available like poverty reduction, neighborhood improvements, and greater racial equality. Reducing or eliminating the test score gap for racial minorities while they are still students can help prevent the disenfranchisement and economic inequality seen presently in minority neighborhoods. The test gap dilemma...
... middle of paper ...
...ss Toward Equity?Educational Researcher January 2002 31: 3-12, doi:10.3102/0013189X031001003
4) Rothman, Robert. "Closing the Achievement Gap: How Schools Are Making It Happen." Journal of the Annenberg Challenge. 5.2 (2002): Print.
5) The Black-White Test Scope Gap: Why It Persists and What Can Be Done
Christopher Jencks and Meredith Phillips
The Brookings Review
Vol. 16, No. 2 (Spring, 1998), pp. 24-27
(article consists of 4 pages)
Published by: The Brookings Institution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20080778
6) Warikoo, Natasha, and Prudence Carter. "Do Catholic High Schools Improve Minority Student Achievement?." American Educational Research Journal. 79.1 (2009): 366-394. Print.
7) Zeith, Timothy. "Do Catholic High Schools Improve Minority Student Achievement?." American Educational Research Journal. 22.3 (1985): 337-349. Print.
Parenting alone is not to blame for poor school performance of African American children. The size of a school affects their student’s dropout rate. When school size increases the quality of education decreases. As stated by Velma Zahirovic-Herbert and Geoffrey
2. “Mexican Americans as a group fail to achieve well on standard tests of academic achievement, and they do not do as well as their Anglo counterparts in the more subjective evaluations of achievement.” (Carter, 17).
Morton explains that political, institutional, and structural factors lead to the segregation of poverty in minority communities because of their lack of access to educational and health service, reliable public transportation, and job (Morton 275). Morton recognizes that the achievement gap goes much deeper than the education realm and she believes
In just about every age group and in every subject, the test-score gap between white and African-American students has grown since 1986, reversing a trend in which the discrepancies decreased from the time the exams were first given in 1969, 1971, and 1973. Since the mid-1980s, gaps in several subjects and age groups have grown by statistically significant amounts.
The achievement gap is defined as the disparity between the performance groups of students, especially groups defined by gender, race/ethnicity, ability and socio-economic status. The achievement gap can be observed through a variety of measures including standardized test scores, grade point averages, drop out rates, college enrollment and completion rates. The Black-White achievement gap is a critical issue in modern society’s education system. Although data surrounding the issue clearly indicates that the racial performance gap exists in areas of standardized tests, graduation rates, dropout rates, and enrollment in continuing education, the causative reasons for the gap are ambiguous—therefore presenting a significant challenge in regard to the most effective way to close the gap. The gap appears before children enter kindergarten and it persists into adulthood (Jencks 1998). Since 1970, the gap has decreased about 40 percent, but has steadily grown since. Theories suggest the Black-White achievement gap is created by a multitude of social, cultural, and economic factors as well as educational opportunities and/or learning experiences. Factors such as biased testing, discrimination by teachers, test anxiety among black students, disparities between blacks and whites in income or family structure, and genetic and cultural differences between blacks and whites have all been evaluated as explanations for the Black-White achievement gap (Farkas 2004). The research that follows will elaborate on these factors as they affect the decline in academic performance of black males—particularly the literacy achievement of black males.
Achievement gaps in schools across America impinge on racial-ethnic and socioeconomic status groups. For generations school systems focus on improving the achievement gaps for low-income and minority students. Statistics have provided evidenced that the school systems made enormous progress between 1970 and 1988, but came to a halt thereafter. Presently in the 20th century the gap has widened and the need for improvement is challenging for the school administr...
The Achievement Gap in America has separated and divided America's youth into more or less, two different cultures of socioeconomic placement. The first being the predominantly Caucasian students at American elementary schools, high schools, and colleges that excel greatly in their education. Most of the time earning them middle to upper class jobs in the economy, the aforementioned group contrasts significantly with its opposite culture of American youth. The second culture, the population that is mostly made up of the minority races, takes it's place in the American education system as the population of students who are less interested in getting a decent education and taking advantage of the resources that are offered, for various underlying reasons. This in turn manufactures less people of this type of culture to be readily available for higher paying jobs, and often times unemployable for a job at all. The Achievement Gap in America is influenced by many cultural, environmental, and socioeconomic factors that separate lower and higher achieving students based on these factors, and leave a high amount of unemployed Americans as a result, if not incarcerated or deceased.
Standardized testing has been proven to be biased towards those of ethnic and socioeconomic disadvantaged groups. Wealthy students become more prepared for standardized tests through better life experiences, such as top-quality schools and test prep tutors. Steven Syverson implies that students with high SAT scores are presumed to be “bright” and encouraged to consider the most selective colleges, with no regard to their academic performance in high school (57). Those students that were considered elite, but did not perform well their parents suggested to admission counselors that they were “not challenged” in high school (Syverson 57). According to Marchant and Paulson, race, parent education, and family income were found to account as much as 94% of the variance in scores among states (85:62). Students that belong to multiple disadvantage categories suffered greatly in the scoring criteria. The majority of students with socioeconomic disadvantages are discouraged from attending college. However, those that choose to further their education are more than likely the first ones in their family to attend college. Due to the large debate involving the admissions process using the SAT score, more colleges have adopted the SAT Optional policy because it is “consistent with their institutional mission and
Poverty and its effects on educational performance of minorities is a societal issue with many facets. First understanding the implications of poverty, and then offering creditable interventions to combat the problem is necessary. First, one must understand that belonging to an underrepresented minority group does not necessarily imply that a student is disadvantaged, but those belonging to those ethnic groups in addition to having low income offer a risk of low academic achievement (Olszewski-Kuilius & Clarenbach, 2012). Statistically, students from minority groups score lower on standardize testing than their white counterparts (Tomlinson & Jarvis, 2014). The reasons for this are numerous. Having
Although we still see issues in education with race/ethnicity, opportunity and inclusiveness has certainly improved from the 1950’s after minorities were desegregated around 1954. In 2012, around 51% of black males graduate high school nationally. However, in some places such as Newark New Jersey, white and black male graduation rates in high school have become similar, with black students even surpassing white male students. However, the gap between black and white males has slightly increased from 2009 to 2013. White males are still generally placed in gifted and talented programs three times as much as black male students. In the 1960s black students accounted for one percent of students in predominantly white schools in the south. By 1986, black students accounted for around 40 % of students. However, this number dropped to about 30% by 2000. These trends show that even with major improvement in racial equality in education, there are still major issues impacting minority’s success in education and opportunities when compared to Caucasians. Nationally there is around a 20% difference in graduation rates between African-American students and white students. Under represented minorities made up around 30% of the population in 2006, but only accounted for less than 20% of engineering and science
In society, education can be seen as a foundation for success. Education prepares people for their careers and allows them to contribute to society efficiently. However, there is an achievement gap in education, especially between Hispanics and Blacks. In other words, there is education inequality between these minorities and white students. This achievement gap is a social problem in the education system since this is affecting many schools in the United States. As a response to this social problem, the No Child Left Behind Act was passed to assist in closing this achievement gap by holding schools more accountable for the students’ progress. Unsuccessful, the No Child Left Behind Act was ineffective as a social response since schools were pushed to produce high test scores in order to show a student’s academic progress which in turn, pressured teachers and students even more to do well on these tests.
How does testing bias of standardized testing impact academic achievement? Standardized educational testing becomes biased when its design or the interpretation and evaluation of the results lead to various systematic disadvantages for the representatives of certain groups in comparison to the prevalent majority. This issue may occur in relation to people of color, lower-class members, ESL students, or the immigrants who are unfamiliar with particular cultural phenomena. For instance, the statistical correlation between SAT scores and income demonstrates that “students with higher family incomes tend to perform significantly better” (Biamonte, 2013. p. 2). The notion that wealthier students are able to improve their scores through test coaching and other similar services only reinforces the existing socioeconomic inequality in the academic sphere, for these services may be unaffordable for lower-class representatives. Thus, the issue of testing bias is closely connected to the concepts of fairness and equality, which, however, are merely the top of the metaphorical iceberg in this matter.
Scholars suggest that standardized testing, tracking, teacher expectations, and the differential distribution on knowledge contribute substantially to the (re)production of social inequalities. Social inequalities consists of advantages/disadvantages associated with groups based on factors such as race and social economic status (SES; class). In the case for education, the advantages/disadvantages can greatly impact the resources that an individual has available to them. These educational advantages can include: access to better schools, preparation for standardized testing, and quality of teachers. This paper will used the books The Truly Disadvantaged by William Julius Wilson and Blacks in the White Elite: Will the Progress Continue? By Richard
Palardy, G., and R. Rumberger. Does Desegregation Matter?: The of Social Composition on Academic Achievement in Southern High Schools. N.p.: University of North Carolina, 2005. Print.
Yet, some of the difference makers who are aware of these issues have achieved some great results in experimenting with alternative schooling strategies. As stated before, even though schools are no longer segregated that does not mean that minorities no longer feel separation between themselves and whites. One school took drastic and controversial measures to attack this issue. Amazingly, this school received equal results. In recognizing that minorities still felt like outsiders, the Bronx 's Eagle Academy High School put those minorities into a majority (Petit P.7). By becoming the Eagle Academy High School for Young Men they desegregated their students by gender and ensured that every student shared similar, community values. Eagle Academy gave each of their students in 2009 an assessment test that found their strength areas, and then they focused on those positive highlights (P. 14). They were then given attendance and lunch incentives followed by after school programs designed to completely maximize young mens success, ability to work effectively and learn the necessary items that provide obtainable routes to a college education (P.15). Mentor programs are set forth by not for profit organizations, and the school gives every parent an open door policy and a list of expectation on them, the student and their highly qualified teachers (P. 18). None of these changes would