Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Educational equality
Background/Context of the Research Problem How does testing bias of standardized testing impact academic achievement? Standardized educational testing becomes biased when its design or the interpretation and evaluation of the results lead to various systematic disadvantages for the representatives of certain groups in comparison to the prevalent majority. This issue may occur in relation to people of color, lower-class members, ESL students, or the immigrants who are unfamiliar with particular cultural phenomena. For instance, the statistical correlation between SAT scores and income demonstrates that “students with higher family incomes tend to perform significantly better” (Biamonte, 2013. p. 2). The notion that wealthier students are able to improve their scores through test coaching and other similar services only reinforces the existing socioeconomic inequality in the academic sphere, for these services may be unaffordable for lower-class representatives. Thus, the issue of testing bias is closely connected to the concepts of fairness and equality, which, however, are merely the top of the metaphorical iceberg in this matter. While …show more content…
By determining the connection between testing bias and academic achievement, it will justify the need for a future reform that would address the existing forms of educational discrimination. While a certain extent of unfairness in standardized tests is nearly impossible to avoid due to such issues as measurement errors, it is important to eliminate systematic institutional discrimination that continues to affect entire groups of students, not only individual cases. Therefore, there is a need in a large-scale educational change that may transform testing as we know it. This study may serve as one of the arguments in support of this future
One widely held explanation for the achievement gap in test performance between Black and White students is that the tests are either culturally or racially biased. Jencks (1998) points out three types of biases...
Standardized tests are biased to certain students whether it is race, or even how much money the parent(s) earn. According to Standardized Testing and Its Victims by Alfie Kohn, the tests are a lot easier for children coming from richer communities like Dublin for example, then Cleveland where funding is scarce (Kohn, 2000). It is not just a rich and poor battle it also is a battle with students and regional or language barriers. According to Uyen Zimmerman, my former math instructor from Dublin Coffman, explained English as a second language students interpret asked questions phrased strangely to them differently than a student whose primary language is English. For example, she said there was a question on the ACT that asked a question about folding pizza and an ESL student thought that it meant putting pizza into a folder. Another example is asking students about black ice when students in states such as Hawaii and Louisiana, have never seen or heard of black ice (Zimmerman, 2014). I agree with her completely. All standardized tests are playing with what the creators of the test think is a “standard” and testing all students across America with the exact same questions.
Since the U.S. Congress passed the No Child Left Behind program, standardized testing has become the norm for American schools. Under this system, each child attending a school is required to take a standardized test at specific grade points to assess their level of comprehension. Parents, scholars and all stakeholders involved take part in constant discussions over its effectiveness in evaluating students’ comprehension, teachers’ competency and the effects of the test on the education system. Though these tests were put in place to create equality, experts note that they have created more inequality in the classroom. In efforts to explore this issue further, this essay reviews two articles on standardized testing. This essay reviews the sentiments of the authors and their insight into standardized examination. The articles provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that standardized tests are not effective at measuring a teacher’s competency because they do not take into account the school environment and its effect on the students.
Throughout the United States standardized testing is a popular way that educators measure a student’s academic ability. Although it may seem like a good idea to give a bunch of students the same test and see how each one does, it is not that simple. The results do not represent how smart a student is or a student's potential to do great things in the real world. In taking a standardized test one student may have a greater advantage over another for many reasons. Reasons that are not shown in the standardized test score.
If, after high-stakes testing, we have higher drop-out rates, particularly among minority groups, and lower or the same academic performance in our public schools, then the former does not result to equity. Instead, it is becoming an obstacle because it is making teaching and learning more difficult for teachers and students, respectively. I have nothing against standards and tests that help make teachers become more accountable for the academic performance of their students, but I think that we need to apply these, not in a punitive way, but in ways that support other means of performance-boosting
Standardized tests are very common throughout the United States. They are used to measure students’ academic performances in school. These tests vary from state to state in all grade levels. However, these tests are believed to be biased towards those students who come from higher-class neighborhoods, simply because they have more educational resources. “The absence of standards virtually guarantees stratified resources and access to knowledge, based upon income, color of skin, and the community and neighborhood in which one lives” (French, 2003). The resources in the suburban areas differ from those in the urban areas, because of the gap within the difference of incomes. Families living in suburban neighborhoods have a bigger income, which enables them to have more resources than those living in urban neighborhoods. Most educational resources come from taxes, which plays a big part in the gap between urban and suburban neighborhoods.
tests were primarily employed as measures of student achievement that could be reported to parents, and as a means of noting state and district trends (Moon 2) . Teachers paid little attention to these tests, which in turn had little impact on curriculum. However, in the continuing quest for better schools and high achieving students, testing has become a central focus of policy and practice. Standardized tests are tests that attempt to present unbiased material under the same, predetermined conditions and with consistent scoring and interpretation so that students have equal opportunities to give correct answers and receive an accurate assessment. The idea is that these similarities allow the highest degree of certainty in comparing result...
Just because a student is black does not mean they are low skilled or uneducated because as mentioned in the court case black people also lived in white neighborhoods. White people can also come from a low-income family. I think standardized testing is biased because of the achievement gap, which whites have more access to resources while many other races do not have that opportunity. This includes schools with money do better because of the education they are providing to their students. This can also lead to the fact that many students are horrible in test taking, but are really passionate and involved in extracurriculars in
Standardized testing scores proficiencies in most generally accepted curricular areas. The margin of error is too great to call this method effective. “High test scores are generally related to things other than the actual quality of education students are receiving” (Kohn 7). “Only recently have test scores been published in the news-paper and used as the primary criteria for judging children, teachers, and schools.”(2) Standardized testing is a great travesty imposed upon the American Public School system.
Argument Against Standardized Testing President Bush is promoting annual standardized testing for all students in grades three through eight. This bill is currently being considered in Congress, and has garnered much support. As of right now, 15 states test students in those grades, and more than 20 have high school exit exams, which look only at the test score of a student, not at his or her academic achievements. Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities to fairly score the increasing number of tests.
In the United States of America, Standardized testing has become a way of life for students and children, especially in public schools. Many argue that standardized testing does not measure the students as a whole, takes up valuable classroom time, and creates drastic mental health problems in students and teachers. In recent years, a controversy surrounding the idea of standardized testing has been brought forth as something that needs to be changed or adapted to the growing needs of today’s students and this can be examined when exploring the negative effects, the testing has had on society’s future.
Some say that standardized tests are inclusive and non-discriminatory because they ensure content is equivalent for all students (ProCon.org).In addition, standardized tests are unfair because the same exam is given to immigrants who barely know English and students with special needs. This leads to an incorrect picture of the quantity of students that are considered to be failing in the United States due to the results of these special need and LEP students being added to the overall national academic results. There are no significant findings in research or studies sufficiently connecting class size and student academic success together (Chingos and Whitehurst, 2011). Nevertheless, in the article Why Class Size Matters Today, years of research prove that class size reduction is a major factor in a student?s academic success (National Council of Teachers of English). In a PISA data collected by Tom Loveless, research shows that in many countries, students that lack motivation scored higher on standardized tests (Zinshteyn,
The 1999 Standards defines ‘customary responsibilities’ for professional test developers, publishers, sponsors, and users in the evaluation of tests, testing practices and effects of test use (AERA, APA & NCME, 1999, p. 73). It contains a section on fairness in testing and test use. While recognizing the existence of many other alternatives but equally legitimate perspectives on fairness, it approves three prevalent characterizations of test fairness in the field of educational and psychological testing: fairness as lack of bias, fairness as equitable treatment of all examinees in the testing process, and fairness as equity in opportunity to learn the materials covered in an achievement test.
Some ways that test bias could be decreased is by having the tests measured on cultural bias by another professional or trained expert. The assessment could be given multiple ways to insure the student’s academic achievement and progress are accurately measured.
For many years, school systems and parents all over America have been asking- does high school testing measure a student’s knowledge fairly, accurately, and do they benefit the student. The tests do not accurately measure a student’s true academic ability. Furthermore, testing does not always fairly measure a student’s knowledge. High-stakes testing only adds stress to a student’s life. Studies have proven that testing is not beneficial to a student’s educational growth. Testing in high school is affected by different factors; therefore results can be unreliable and not beneficial to the growth of students.