Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The most dangerous game interpretation
Most dangerous game literary devices
Most dangerous game literary devices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The most dangerous game interpretation
Benjamin Book 11/7/14
Are you fighting him or yourself?
The best and most memorable short stories are the ones that contain conflict. The most obvious form of conflict is man versus man, where there is an external conflict between two characters, or even an internal conflict within man himself. Within “The Most Dangerous Game”, the main character Rainsford meets General Zaroff, a fellow hunter who has invented a new game to hunt. When Rainsford finds out that the new game is humans, he is disgusted by the idea. Yet, when he is later hunted by the General, he begins to feel the thrill of having a battle of wits with his opponent. This stirs within him an inner conflict of thoughts contrary to the
…show more content…
disgust he had previously felt. Similarly, in the short story “Interpreter of Maladies”, the main character, an Indian man named Mr. Kapasi meets the enrapturing Indian American woman, Mrs. Das. Mrs. Das, with her demeanor and characteristics, catches Mr. Kapasi’s eye and causes him to begin to question his beliefs and life decisions. Both Kapasi and Rainsford initially appear to be locked in a conflict with another person, however, through external encounters with another, an internal conflict ignites within them which shapes the story as a whole. An understanding of an internal conflict is not possible without first setting up the ideas within the individual that will ultimately be at odds.
In “The Most Dangerous Game”, the way in which one can understand Rainsford’s ideas was through several man versus man conflicts between himself and Whitney in the beginning of the story and General Zaroff and himself towards the end of the story. The conflict between Whitney and Rainsford was displayed through a discussion in which they expressed their points of view about hunting. While they both agreed that hunting is the best sport in the world, Whitney thought that this was only true for the hunter. To which Rainsford responded “Don’t talk rot Whitney… Who cares how a Jaguar feels?” The conversation progressed, and finally caused Rainsford to express his ideal view of the world that “The world is made up of two classes the hunters and the huntees…” As the final point on the subject, these ideas planted the seeds of conflict within Rainsford as he is later forced to choose between his ideals of hunting and his own …show more content…
morality. Morality is something that comes into question when discussing internal conflict. Certainly that is the case when dealing with a sport such as hunting. With an experienced hunter such as General Zaroff, one would certainly not describe him as a moral figure. Despite his apparent lack of morality, he appears to be quite educated and shares a similar ideal with Rainsford about the world and hunting. He described to him how “Hunting had ceased to be what you call ‘a sporting proposition’. It had become too easy. I always got my quarry. Always. There is no greater bore then perfection… Rainsford leaned across the table absorbed in what his host was saying…” When Rainsford discovered that General Zaroff ended the boredom he was experiencing by hunting men, he called it murder to which the General responded “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if need be taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure…” The General’s ideas were thus extremely similar, if not identical, to the one Rainsford had expressed earlier about the world being made up of the hunters and the hunted. While it may have appeared in the story as though Rainsford was arguing with the General, it is apparent through the similarity of their shared ideals that he was really struggling within himself regarding his intrigue with the game of “outdoor chess”. An outdoor chess game would not be appropriate way to describe “Interpreter of Maladies”; rather it is more like a fencing match, a back and forth between what Indian culture demands of its subjects and the promise of freedom by western civilization. The main character, Mr. Kapasi, at first appears to be ignorant as to his internal feelings about his life and his yearning for the liberties of the west. However, after observing Mrs. Das, he realizes his true feelings about his life and his lack of accomplishment, creating feelings of disappointment and conflict within himself. This internal war is set up when Mrs. Das notices the “romantic” nature of Mr. Kapasi’s job as the interpreter of maladies in a doctor’s office. Mr. Kapasi creates scenarios in his head about how “In time she would reveal the disappointment of her marriage, and he his” which causes him to have a revelation about the woman he had just met and how she made him feel. “As his mind raced Mr. Kapasi experienced a mild and pleasant shock… In those moments Mr. Kapasi used to believe all was right in the world, that all struggle were rewarded, that all of life’s mistakes made sense at the end.” Mrs. Das made Mr. Kapasi feel special, he did not feel as though she was ignoring him as had many others, including his own wife. Mrs. Das stirred up Mr. Kapasi’s feelings of finally being wanted and unique, therefore initiating a conflict within him about the decisions that he had made in his life so far. These feelings represent the clash in Western and Eastern culture. Mr. Kapasi dreams of developing a romantic relationship with the attractive Mrs. Das, that perhaps they will engage in a lively correspondence of letters once she returns home. However, the more he learns about Mrs. Das, the less attractive she appears, and his fantasy of bridging the gap between them dissolves just as the slip of paper containing her address drifts away. Mr. Kapasi's crush could perhaps symbolize the East's attraction to the West, which only at a distance seems desirable. Mr. Kapasi’s internal disappointment was specifically focused on his inadequate marriage, schooling, and job. He believed that he failed in all three of these areas. His marriage is loveless; he had quit school before graduating, and settled for an average job. Mrs. Das made him feel special. He thought about how “Mrs. Das was different. Unlike the other women, who had an interest only in the temple, and kept their noses buried in their guidebook, or their eyes behind the lens of a camera, Mrs. Das had taken an interest in him.” She made him feel needed in a way that his wife or his boss never did. She believed that he had the unique ability to help her out with a problem that she did not confide in anyone else. Therefore when it was time to finally bring the Das’s back to their hotel, Mr. Kapasi who “Ordinarily he sped back to Puri using a shortcut eager to return home…The thought of that silence, something in which he’d long been resigned, now oppressed him.” This oppression is what the Indian culture imposed upon Mr. Kapasi as he was part of a common practice of arranged marriage, and like so many others forced to drop his personal interests in order to provide a living for himself. While it may appear in the story as though Mrs. Das is the one who creates these conflicts within Mr. Kapasi as though she was the antagonist, in reality these were feelings he had been carrying for a while and her presence merely ignites the conflict that had stirred within him for so long. In conclusion, while both Mr.
Kapasi and Rainsford appeared to be locked in conflict with other people, these people really only represented or instigated what they had been previously feeling. While they both eventually resolved their internal conflicts, it was only after they experienced an epiphany about the realities of their situations and saw what they had initially thought was entirely false. For Rainsford, this false thought was his “romanticized” view of hunting and how what General Zaroff was doing was wrong but eventually begins to understand the thrill that the General experienced and therefore becomes the new hunter of men. Mr. Kapasi also saw Mrs. Das in an almost too perfect light causing a war within himself about his own life. However, when he realized how damaged she and the Das family were, he finally understood that his life was not as bad in comparison to theirs and that he should appreciate his own life. Both Kapasi and Rainsford appear to be locked in a conflict with another person, however, through this encounter with another person, an internal conflict ignites within them eventually leading them to have a revelation about themselves and who they are. In both “Interpreter of Maladies” and “The Most Dangerous Game”, the main characters are locked in conflict, but not with others, rather it’s a conflict that they have within themselves that is represented by others such as Mrs. Das and General
Zaroff.
Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.
After reading “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell. I have decided that the character that holds the most power was “General Zaroff”. I came to this conclusion based on the fact that he knew what was going to happen from the start. “General Zaroff” also held intimate knowledge of the island, a home base to receive medical treatment, backup from a bodyguard, a canine unit, and superior firepower.
The main conflict of the story is one that affects everyone. Samuel Westing puts 16 heirs up to the task to find out who murdered him, but no one can solve this horrendous crime, this is the main conflict of the story. This type of conflict is person versus person, where it is each heir against the other. All of the heirs have the problem and the problem is not
“You’re a big-game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels?”. The story “The Most dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell introduces an adventurous type of thriller with two main characters named Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Both of which are hunters who in the story play a “game” invented by General Zaroff out of pure fear of becoming bored of the hunt. General Zaroff is a big fan of the hunt and everything he says about the hunt is to be taken serious. Rainsford and General Zaroff are described to be excellent hunters through the traps Rainsford makes, all the big game Zaroff has hunted, but Zaroff is better at hunting through the fact that the hunt has began to bore and he needs more of a challenge hunting humans.
If one were to put another character in Rainsford’s position such as Whitney, it is likely that the story would not have ended the way it did. A main reason as to why Rainsford is the dynamic character he is, and can survive such a harsh game, is because he is very self-assured. While passing Ship-Trap Island, all the sailors, aside from Rainsford, are a little anxious because of rumors heard about the island. Rainsford believes that, “one superstitious sailor can taint the whole ships company with his fear,” (page 56). During a firm discussion with Whitney about hunting, Rainsford boldly argues how jaguars are just here to be hunted. Ironically, by the end of the story he thinks just the opposite. The first time he encounters General Zaroff, Rainsford earns the General’s trust instantly because he shows his independence and confidence to him. As he hears about the game, Rainsford does not express obvious fear toward General Zaroff. Being self-assured helps Rainsford to be the strong hunter he is.
In the beginning of the story, Rainsford has a conversation with his friend, Whitney, about hunting animals. Rainford does not care about the animals that he hunts. He believes hunting is only a sport to kill innocent creatures. “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels?’” (1) Showing the reader exactly what he thinks of hunting. Rainsford does not understand that the animals he hunts are like the people that Zaroff hunts. They are innocent, and he is murdering them when he hunts them. Rainsford thinks that Zaroff is insane for murdering people, but Rainsford is also a murderer. When Zaroff hunts Rainsford, the protagonist realizes the terror and pain the jaguars must have felt when he hunted them. Now the roles are reversed, and Rainsford is the one being hunted. “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. The general was saving him for another day’s sport! Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” (17) Rainsford has changed his feelings about hunting animals now, and he has become a better person. He now takes into account how his prey feels. His interactions with people will also be different, because instead of being extremely overconfident, he realizes that he is not perfectly adept at hunting, and everyone has feelings that matter. In conclusion, Rainsford is now more humble and less overconfident than he was when he began his
What are the best types of conflicts? Night by Elie Wiesel contains a lot of uses of conflict. This is a story told from the viewpoint of Elie. In the story he talks about his experiences as a Jew during the Holocaust. If not already obvious this is a true story. The conflict of character vs self develops throughout the story and effects Elie.
In Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford’s motivations changed from wanting to be a great hunter to trying to stay alive. As Whitney and Rainsford are headed to Rio to hunt they are talking about the great sport itself, hunting. Rainsford agrees with Whitney and says that hunting is, “The best sport in the world” (Connell 1). This shows he enjoys hunting by saying that it’s is the best and most enjoyable sport in the world. If you are passionate about something it can motivate you to try new things and in his case, hunting new animals. After Rainsford falls off the yacht and wanders to the island he then finds a home and knocks on the door. Ivan answers and General Zaroff soon approached Rainsford and saluted him. After allowing
“Ender’s Game is an eye opening book with unique conflicts. The two major conflicts are internal, being that of how Ender was mentally broken down, and external,being that of the “Bugger” Human war. Both of the conflicts make Ender question himself morally. There are many key figures that contributed in the conflict whether it sets the conflict or helps end it .
First, Rainsford had too much pride for his own good. “‘The best sport in the world,’ agreed Rainsford. ‘For the hunter,’ amended Whitney. ‘Not the jaguar.’ ‘Don't talk rot, Whitney,’ said Rainsford. ‘You’re a big game hunter, not a philosopher. Who cares how the jaguar feels?’(60).” Rainsford never tried to put himself in someone else's shoes, even when someone like Whitney tried to tell him and make him see empathy. Later on in the story, the General gives Rainsford and chance to hide, then sets out to hunt him. Only after being hunted does Rainsford understand what Whitney was talking about when he said, “‘Not the jaguar’(60).”
The war between individual is regarded as a rivalry. Knowles has highlighted various kinds of the competition. Different characters in the novel have demonstrated many competing egos. Gene and his friend Finny show a very clear example of such competing ego. The kind of rivalry that existed between him and Finny led to a tragic accident. The occurrence of the fatal accident, unfortunately, leads to Finny’s death. The novel hence brings us closer to the understanding of the impacts of the rivalry. The rivalry is very dangerous, especially when it turns sour for individuals. "To keep silent about this amazing happening deepened the shock for me. It made Finny seem too unusual for not friendship, but too unusual for rivalry. And there were a few relationships among us at Devon not based on the rivalry" (Knowles 15). The kind of rivalry that existed between Gene and Finny led to the tragic death. The loss of life is so tragic, and no one can ever wish to die like that. Knowles, therefore, tries as much to warn people through his novel about the effects of the rivalry.
Some people you meet can have a major impact on your life and change it for better or for worse. Rainsfords (a man who likes to hunt dangerous animals) life was greatly changed in both a good way and a bad way by a man who lives on a tiny island in a big house named General Zaroff. Rainsford ended up on this island after he fell of a yacht he was on to go hunt an animal somewhere else but ended up swimming his way up to the shore of an island. But after about a day of being on the island Rainsford was being hunted down. While Rainsford was trying his hardest to survive on the island he was on he found a way to escape to the mainland where General Zaroff was to try and get a way off the island back to civilization. The points in this story will be somehow related to my thesis statement in ¨The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Zaroff teaches Rainsford how it feels to be like the hunted and not the hunter.
In John Knowles’s novel, A separate peace, all the types of conflict were shown through the main character Gene. Gene had countless battles between other characters and the society of his time, which in turn created conflicts within himself. These unfortunate events eventually changed Gene, and he could no longer return to his old self. Conflict is a dangerous subject because it can change not only your own self, but also the things around
A book or story with no conflict is like gum with no flavor, boring. The best stories have a conflict that can grab the reader and keep the story interesting by changing or giving the character a problem to find a solution to. In the story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was given a conflict that he had to find a solution to. Rainsford fell out of a yacht and swam in the direction of the gunshots that he heard from the distance. Eventually he met with with General Zaroff who hunted humans because he finds that animals don't give him a challenge.“I had to invent a new animal to hunt” he said. “A new animal? Your joking (34)”. However, General Zaroff wants Rainsford to start hunting with him but, Rainsford