Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brutus and cassius compare and contrast essay
Brutus and cassius compare and contrast essay
Brutus and cassius compare and contrast essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brutus and cassius compare and contrast essay
Exploring the Way Shakespeare Presents the Motives for Brutus Killing
Caesar
Shakespeare has presented Brutus as a brave courageous man who is very
loyal and patriotic to Rome. Brutus even claims he would rather die
and lose his honour that see Rome collapse. “If it ought to be for
general good, I’d set honour in one eye and death I’th other I will
look on both indifferently”. Shakespeare presents him as a man so
loyal to Rome he would kill a man he loves, Caesar, for it.
Cassius tries to convince Brutus that Caesar is not physically strong
enough, and is weaker than Cassius and Brutus. Brutus replies “What
you have said I will consider”. Cassius has manipulated Brutus but not
by a lot because Brutus was already thinking this for himself and
Cassius was merely pushing his thoughts further along.
Shakespeare makes sure that Brutus is not there to see Caesar be
offered the crown. This means that Casca has to tell him what
happened. We believed that Casca twists the story of Caesar refusing
crown, although we have no proof that Casca has twisted it we believe
he does because he say Caesar would “ fain have had it” but we think
Caesar truly didn’t want the crown.
In act two; scene one Brutus is presented a man with a conscience. We
believe this because he cannot sleep, ‘Since Cassius did whet me
against Caesar, I have not slept’. Because he is thinking about Caesar
to much showing he has conscience and won’t just kill Caesar because
he can. Shakespeare presents this scene in the dark alone in Brutus’s
garden to create an eerie effect making it tense too. Shakespeare
presents it in the garden so it is a bit like the Garden of Eden with
the temptation of killing Caesar.
Portia describes Brutus as being physically sick “Is Brutus sick?”.
Shakespeare presents this in this way to show how it is personally
affecting Brutus. When Brutus is talking to Ligarius, the imagery of
sickness is used as a metaphor “a piece of work that will make sick
“The only way is to kill Caesar I have no personal reason to strike at him
In the Shakespearean play, Romeo & Juliet, aggression is represented in different ways by the different characters in the play. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio, and the others all have their own way of dealing with hate and anger. Some do nothing but hate while others can’t stand to see even the smallest of quarrels take place.
In this scene, Caesar shows no eagerness to gain power or fame as the citizens have assumed therefore showing no ambition whatsoever. The imagery and logical reasoning persuade the audience into rethinking if Caesar was ambitious and believe that Caesar was
that Caesar is just putting on an act and that once he becomes king he will not be as nice
The definition of a tragic hero is perceived as on who is neither wicked nor purely innocent, one who “is brave and noble but guilty of the tragic flaw of assuming that honorable ends justify dishonorable means”. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus takes the role of the tragic hero. Brutus’s honor, nobility, and self-righteousness makes him “a tragic figure, if not the hero” (Catherine C. Dominic).
The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.
Brutus’ tragic flaws are part of what makes him a tragic hero. In Julius Caesar, Brutus is a great example of a tragic hero. His tragic flaws are honor, poor judgement, and idealism (Bedell). In Shakespeare’s plays, the tragic hero and his flaws cause the downfall of the play (Tragic Flaws).
Written one year apart from the other, one cannot fail to recognize the parallels between William Shakespeare's tragedies Julius Caesar and Hamlet. To begin, they are both stories of assassinations gone horribly wrong. Although the details of the plays are different, the two assassins (Brutus and Hamlet) provide interesting comparison. Through these two killers, Shakespeare reveals the different levels of justice; one’s personal sense of justice; others’ perception of justice; the justice of the monarchy that supports Shakespeare’s craft. Through this, the audience realizes that a just person is not always a humble one, a condition that may turn out to be a fatal flaw in the end. When a man decides to play God by taking justice into his own hands, the world can unravel much more quickly than he had ever imagined.
Motivation can cause people to work hard and win a state championship, but it can also cause people to kill. Motivation can be defined as an internal state of a person that drives them to action for the purpose of reaching a target goal. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is a tragic drama that shows a huge variety of the different motives that fuel each character. Readers see what motivates each character, and how far that motivation takes them. Whether they are motivated by malice, jealousy, revenge, or loyalty, each character has their own incentives for their actions. Whatever motives they may have, readers see how these motives drive Cassius, Brutus, and Antony to extreme measures, and how this leads to tragic deaths in the end.
Hatred, in Shakespeare’s Othello, destroyed the lives of so many innocent people, creating an atmosphere of fear and mayhem. Jealousy turned into a deep hatred, and liberated the "beast in man" (Bloom's major dramatists).This mayhem caused a substantial amount of destruction and led to the demise of many.
Secondly, he wanted to conquer the entire world and he knew nothing would’ve stopped him or his madness. If they didn’t kill him, Caesar would have ruled the world with ease and he would be ruthless. No one is equal to him, he thinks of himself like a god. (II, ii, 105-107).
William Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, was mainly based on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The character who was the mastermind behind the assassination was, ironically, Marcus Brutus, a senator and close friend to Julius Caesar. But what would cause a person to kill a close friend? After I examined Brutus' relationship towards Caesar, his involvement in the conspiracy and his importance to the plot it all became clear. Brutus had one particular reason for killing Caesar and that was for the good of the people and the republic. Brutus had no personal reason for killing Caesar. Some of his most admirable traits were his morality and leadership skills.
Shakespeare's Hamlet presents the generic elements found in Renaissance revenge tragedies ("Revenge Tragedy"). However, although Hamlet is a revenge tragedy by definition, Shakespeare complicates the basic revenge plot by creating three revenge plots out of one. By adding significant innovations, Shakespeare creates "three concentric rings of revenge" (Frye 90), depicting an indecisive protagonist who is an intellectual rather than a physical hero, an ambiguous ghost, and several problematic aspects of the play, such as the reason for Hamlet's delay, the confusion of time, and the truth behind Hamlet's apparent madness.
Girls were seen as the property of their fathers – to be given away to
Hamlet can be explored from a Traditional Revenge Tragedy approach, as the whole play revolves around Hamlet seeking revenge for his father’s death. Traditional Revenge Tragedy is whenever a crime is committed against someone, but the character cannot get revenge in a lawful way, so they have to take it upon themselves to punish the other character even if it is a involves a personal risk (Taofiki.) Whenever Hamlet’s father first dies, everyone assumes it is just a natural death, but soon a ghost comes to make Hamlet think otherwise. The ghost reveals to Hamlet that his own brother, Hamlet’s uncle who now is married to his mother, murdered his father by pouring snake venom into his ear. Hamlet is then faced with a predicament because his father